Inner Ear Hair Cell Regeneration — Maybe We Can Know More

I don't understand what's wring with frequency therapeutics coming out and telling us if the test subjects had tinnitus and reported any reduction. If it actually works then us knowing that isnt going to alter the fabric of space time and somehow cause it to not work. Also, they can test for tinnitus in rodents so why havent they gone a step further with hearing regeneration experiments and tested if the rodents lost their tinnitus? Why arent we allowed to know anything? Everything is a damn secret.
 
Seriously, why havent there been rodent experiments involving hearing restoration and tinnitus?
I don't know why T is not mentioned in theses studies at all. I should be. Everyones different but I would easily take 100% loss at every frequency my T's at and not hear it. Maybe there is a special surprise for us
 
Anyone have access to this press-release?
https://www.cell.com/trends/neurosciences/fulltext/S0166-2236(96)01004-1?_returnURL=https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0166223696010041?showall=true

It seems that in many cases, hearing loss is result of lost of synapses not hair cells.
I repeat my question from other thread:

Would hair cells give OAE responses with broken connections with nerves?
Would hair cells give OAE responses with cut off ear nerve?

Thanks.
Look what I found :) It's the full text of the article.
 

Attachments

  • schimmang1997.pdf
    301.3 KB · Views: 73
@
Anyone have access to this press-release?
https://www.cell.com/trends/neurosciences/fulltext/S0166-2236(96)01004-1?_returnURL=https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0166223696010041?showall=true

It seems that in many cases, hearing loss is result of lost of synapses not hair cells.
I repeat my question from other thread:

Would hair cells give OAE responses with broken connections with nerves?
Would hair cells give OAE responses with cut off ear nerve?

Thanks.
isnt this what frequency and decibel are both focusing on?
 
The attached presentation by Dan Winkowski of the University of Maryland, College Park provides some explanation on how they know if their mice have tinnitus.

Too bad, I can't just easily apply this method to my dogs. I still wonder if I gave them tinnitus as well... because of hearing damage.

As I (probably) have high frequency hearing loss, I might get a high frequency dog whistle to see if they still react.

For the rest they hear everything and seem pretty relax and happy. They still hear mice in our garden squeek too.
 
Has anyone seen any news about Fx-322 in mass media? I only found news on small websites. If it's something promising, it should take relevance.
That's because mainstream media doesn't care about bio-sciences or medical breakthroughs. they just care about mind garbage day time television , fixated left wing politics to argue about and and scantly clothed women.

By Stage 3 of Frequency I expect it to get some media attention, maybe science networks may mention it once it a while but the general public doesn't care about science improving lives of millions.
 
How can you tell if a rodent has tinnitus?
(And no, this isn't the opening of a bad joke!)
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11896177
upload_2018-10-13_11-6-26.png
 
Has anyone seen any news about Fx-322 in mass media? I only found news on small websites. If it's something promising, it should take relevance.
People are too obsessed with dumb politics and Instagram models. They spent two weeks completely focused that ridiculous supreme court circus. Maybe if they would have protested the Iraq war that hard maybe the middle east would be a lot more stable.
 
That's because mainstream media doesn't care about bio-sciences or medical breakthroughs. they just care about mind garbage day time television , fixated left wing politics to argue about and and scantly clothed women.

By Stage 3 of Frequency I expect it to get some media attention, maybe science networks may mention it once it a while but the general public doesn't care about science improving lives of millions.

or...perhaps a part of the scientific community considers that it will not work. But we need to keep hopes high
 
or...perhaps a part of the scientific community considers that it will not work. But we need to keep hopes high
I disagree, it's that a status quo exist with audiologist only caring about selling hearing aids and normies not caring about science because it's "lame"
 
Anyone have access to this press-release?
https://www.cell.com/trends/neurosciences/fulltext/S0166-2236(96)01004-1?_returnURL=https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0166223696010041?showall=true

It seems that in many cases, hearing loss is result of lost of synapses not hair cells.
I repeat my question from other thread:

Would hair cells give OAE responses with broken connections with nerves?
Would hair cells give OAE responses with cut off ear nerve?

Thanks.
I asked this question before if compensating for existing hair cells with damaged synapses with new hair cells will make up and the answer is "we don't know" also other aspects of the audiotory nerve are damaged too.

I fret hair cell regeneration will fail trials once they realize synapse and audiotory nerve fiber damage also need to be repaired. then again I am not anyone qualified I am only making a loose hypothesis.
 

Log in or register to get the full forum benefits!

Register

Register on Tinnitus Talk for free!

Register Now