Inner Ear Hair Cell Regeneration — Maybe We Can Know More

Major gift (> $2o million) to Mass Eye and Ear for hearing loss research http://www.masseyeandear.org/news/p...to-mass-eye-and-ear-among-largest-for-hearing
"The gift will allow Mass. Eye and Ear to provide long-term sustained research support in the areas of hearing and balance, seed new Chairs for faculty and enable recruitment of additional world-leading hearing researchers. Scientists at the Eaton-Peabody Laboratories are focused on understanding hearing from the outer ear to the brain, with the goal of pursuing new treatment strategies for hearing loss and other hearing impairments such as tinnitus (ringing in the ears) and hyperacusis (painful hearing sensitivity), as well as balance disorder"

Sounds good.
 
I believe they are needing 200 million dollar by 2020 to fully fund all the research that they want to do. They are at 150 million now. To get everything moving at a quicker pace, more fundraising would help. I think I read in the article that everyone can help. I think every little bit helps, and I will be doing my part to help. :)
 
My point of view on tinitus is that our supporting hear cell and nerves are healthy, only the cilia are damaged. It is like that the cilia instead to be straight are floded as when they vibrates due to sounds. In other words our cilia are broken! Is this probably what happen to us? Please advice
 
My point of view on tinitus is that our supporting hear cell and nerves are healthy, only the cilia are damaged.
Let me just clear up some of the confusion. There are three main types of cells. These are:
  • Hair cells
  • Supporting cells
  • Nerve cells
Cilia are not cells, they are part of the hair cells.

Now, it is said that there are different reasons for tinnitus. I myself am not convinced. I think all forms of tinnitus have a common cause, they just haven't figured out the exact mechanisms of it all yet.

As for noise induced tinnitus, the prevailing theory is that it is the synapses that are damaged first, before the hair cells or supporting cells.

It is like that the cilia instead to be straight are floded as when they vibrates due to sounds.

Yes! Hair cells can be damaged, as well as synapses and nerves.



In other words our cilia are broken!
Yes, if the damage is severe enough they can break off instantly, giving you not only tinnitus but also deafness for life.
 
There are a lot of researchers working on inner ear hair cell regeneration. I believe it offers the most hope of a treatment for deafness and hopefully tinnitus too. Some researches are confident that there will be a treatment of this kind available within the next 5 years.
This area of research gives me some degree of hope.
 
For those interested
XTd20AO.jpg

Paper:
http://docdro.id/Itr6NQg
 
Not sure if this means for ear stuff but either way very good news!
although not mention directly in the article, the process for hair cell regeneration falls into the regeneritive or RMAT (regenerative medicine advanced therapy) designation. Hopefully this will speed up the process for freq tx and other companies.
 
although not mention directly in the article, the process for hair cell regeneration falls into the regeneritive or RMAT (regenerative medicine advanced therapy) designation. Hopefully this will speed up the process for freq tx and other companies.
There is SH1T loads of cash just waiting to be used in California, CIRM have insane money, its really supposed to generate business in that state etc BUT there are mechanisms by which you could have a holding office in the state to fund large projects somwhere else, its funny cuz they have to use it up otherwise it gets cut, so they BEGGING labs to apply for grants! Just thought I would point out that gap.
 
There is SH1T loads of cash just waiting to be used in California, CIRM have insane money, its really supposed to generate business in that state etc BUT there are mechanisms by which you could have a holding office in the state to fund large projects somwhere else, its funny cuz they have to use it up otherwise it gets cut, so they BEGGING labs to apply for grants! Just thought I would point out that gap.
Could you elaborate on that? Are you saying that companies like Frequency could apply for CIRM grants if they chose to move their business to California?
 
BUT there are mechanisms by which you could have a holding office in the state to fund large projects somwhere else
So this is the loophole? Frequency and the like could open an office in California, get the funding, and do their business in Massachusetts?

its funny cuz they have to use it up otherwise it gets cut
They get to keep the funds even after being discovered that they are doing their business elsewhere and not in California?

Interesting concept! :D

The California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (CIRM) was created in 2004 after 59% of California voters approved California Proposition 71 (2004: The California Stem Cell Research and Cures Initiative). The passing of Proposition 71 established a 29-member Independent Citizens Oversight Committee (ICOC) that governs the allocation of the $3 billion authorized to fund stem cell research in California. The agency was authorized to distribute the money in grants, funded by bonds, over a ten-year period to institutions and scientists throughout California that focused on advancing stem cell research and regenerative medicine.

It is expected that the $3 billion initially funded to CIRM through Proposition 71 will end by 2017. Therefore, discussion continues to increase regarding how and if CIRM will continue funding current and future stem cell research projects. In February 2014, Robert Klein, [...] presented a proposal [...] to extend CIRM funding. If the public supports the proposal, Klein and other backers have said they would work to get an initiative on the 2016 ballot that would provide an additional $5 billion in funding to CIRM and stem cell research. The other option discussed is for CIRM to become a private, non-profit organization that would rely solely on outside funding.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Institute_for_Regenerative_Medicine

Indeed, that is a shitload of money! :eek:

What happened to CIRM since that, did they extend the funding?
 
So this is the loophole? Frequency and the like could open an office in California, get the funding, and do their business in Massachusetts?


They get to keep the funds even after being discovered that they are doing their business elsewhere and not in California?

Interesting concept! :D



Indeed, that is a shitload of money! :eek:

What happened to CIRM since that, did they extend the funding?
I spoke to someone there and they explained there are legal ways of doing this. Its not necessarily illegal per se. But with frequency, I get the impression they want to keep their business tight and everything in house...including prospective profit.
 
I spoke to someone there and they explained there are legal ways of doing this. Its not necessarily illegal per se. But with frequency, I get the impression they want to keep their business tight and everything in house...including prospective profit.
Let's just call it grey area! :)

As far as I'm concerned, anything that can push the therapies forward is very much welcome, be it that we must cross a green, grey or a red tape.
 
Has anything changed recently? Is there a cure soon? Been watching this thread and know about frequency and I think decibel. Are there any others? Is there a projected timeframe for a cure for hearing loss for those who has lost it? Just really need some hope.
 
Is there a cure soon? Been watching this thread and know about frequency and I think decibel. Are there any others? Is there a projected timeframe for a cure for hearing loss for those who has lost it? Just really need some hope.
The earliest in my humble opinion from everything that is going on currently maybe in five years and if only everything runs perfectly (meeting or exceeding expected results in each phase).
 
Good thing is that there are companies not regulated by FDA outside of US and EU, i just think that maybe things are speeding up more under these circumstances
 
Came across this last night elsewhere,
just thought I would share.

----------------------------------------
December 30, 2016
As we are approaching the end of this year, I wanted to point out an event which probably has "flown under the radar" for a lot of people, but, where we can expect more highlights in the coming year. Several years ago, the Florida Hospital for Children initiated a clinical trial concerning congenital and acquired hearing loss in children. The point of the investigation was to examine the potential efficacy of stem cells in children. The 10-patient trial reached its completion this year (incl. the subsequent patient evaluations). Publication of results is expected early next year. However, from a person affiliated with the hospital, I managed to learn ahead of the release of the official results that positive effects from the study had been observed. Being a trial (as opposed to a single-patient case study), there is obviously much more scientific rigour involved. In addition, this is the first trial specifically conducted with the aim of proving / disproving efficacy of cord blood-derived stem cells for the treatment of hearing loss in children. The attachment presentation takes a look at the science behind stem cells and the rationale for attempting the therapy for hearing loss, specifically. The stem cells used were delivered intravenously. The presentation references at least two peer reviewed papers:

1) www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23165382
2) www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18819255

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Came across this last night elsewhere,
just thought I would share.

----------------------------------------
December 30, 2016
As we are approaching the end of this year, I wanted to point out an event which probably has "flown under the radar" for a lot of people, but, where we can expect more highlights in the coming year. Several years ago, the Florida Hospital for Children initiated a clinical trial concerning congenital and acquired hearing loss in children. The point of the investigation was to examine the potential efficacy of stem cells in children. The 10-patient trial reached its completion this year (incl. the subsequent patient evaluations). Publication of results is expected early next year. However, from a person affiliated with the hospital, I managed to learn ahead of the release of the official results that positive effects from the study had been observed. Being a trial (as opposed to a single-patient case study), there is obviously much more scientific rigour involved. In addition, this is the first trial specifically conducted with the aim of proving / disproving efficacy of cord blood-derived stem cells for the treatment of hearing loss in children. The attachment presentation takes a look at the science behind stem cells and the rationale for attempting the therapy for hearing loss, specifically. The stem cells used were delivered intravenously. The presentation references at least two peer reviewed papers:

1) www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23165382
2) www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18819255

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I wish we had cord blood too. :(
 
The study that they are talking about, are they using the same method as ATTHEEDGEOFSCIENCE had when he went for his stem cell treatment in Thailand? Or am I seeing this wrong?
 
An update on companies involved in HL research (not just regenerating hair cells): https://www.biocentury.com/biocentu...6-02/how-hearing-loss-became-investable-space I don't have a subscription so I haven't read the entire article. Of note is the graphic. What follows is a quote from Figure 1

"The majority of hearing loss programs have anti-inflammatory and/or anti-apoptotic properties that aim to prevent hearing loss or stop it from progressing. Some of these, such as brimapitide from Auris Medical Holding AG (NASDAQ:EARS) and Otividex dexamethasone otic gel from Otonomy Inc. (NASDAQ:OTIC), are exploiting advanced delivery technologies that should reduce treatment burden and improve efficacy over off-label steroids.

At least two in this category, SENS-401 from Sensorion S.A. (Euronext:ALSEN) and AF243 from Affichem S.A., may also promote repair of axons and synapses. Compounds in the otoprotective category below protect sensory neurons by other types of mechanisms.

At least nine companies aim to reverse hearing loss that has already occurred by regenerating lost hair cells or synapses. The only regenerative program in the clinic is CGF166, a gene therapy from Novartis AG (NYSE:NVS; SIX:NOVN) and GenVec Inc. (NASDAQ:GNVC) that uses a recombinant adenovirus 5 (Ad5) vector to deliver the atonal homolog 1 (ATOH1; HATH1) transcription factor. Acousia Therapeutics GmbH, Audion Therapeutics B.V., Decibel Therapeutics Inc., Inception 3 Inc., Otologic Pharmaceutics Inc. and Otonomy each have undisclosed regenerative therapies in preclinical development not shown below.

Autifony Therapeutics Ltd. is the only company targeting the CNS component of hearing. AUT00063 modulates potassium channels in the brain to enhance central auditory processing.

The chart includes lead indication for each program. Those not specifically noted with "prevent" are intended to treat their respective indications. (A) Spiral Therapeutics Inc. has an option to BN201 and BN119 for inner ear disorders and anticipates making a decision by 3Q17; (B) GenVec Inc. is being acquired by Intrexon Corp. (NYSE:XON); (C) Phase I/II ongoing; JNK = c-jun N-terminal kinase; LXR = liver X receptor; PGF2 alpha = prostaglandin F2 alpha receptor; NFE2L2 = nuclear factor (erythroid-derived 2)-like 2 (NRF2); PPAR = peroxisome proliferation activated receptor; KCNC1 = potassium channel Kv3.1; APAF1 = apoptotic peptidase activating factor 1 (APAF1); SGK2 = serum/glucocorticoid regulated kinase 2; CDKN1B = cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor 1B; Source: BCIQ: BioCentury Online Intelligence, company press releases, company interviews

BC-Hearing_GFX_Piplelinepos_web_i.jpg

"
 
An update on companies involved in HL research (not just regenerating hair cells): https://www.biocentury.com/biocentu...6-02/how-hearing-loss-became-investable-space I don't have a subscription so I haven't read the entire article. Of note is the graphic. What follows is a quote from Figure 1

"The majority of hearing loss programs have anti-inflammatory and/or anti-apoptotic properties that aim to prevent hearing loss or stop it from progressing. Some of these, such as brimapitide from Auris Medical Holding AG (NASDAQ:EARS) and Otividex dexamethasone otic gel from Otonomy Inc. (NASDAQ:OTIC), are exploiting advanced delivery technologies that should reduce treatment burden and improve efficacy over off-label steroids.

At least two in this category, SENS-401 from Sensorion S.A. (Euronext:ALSEN) and AF243 from Affichem S.A., may also promote repair of axons and synapses. Compounds in the otoprotective category below protect sensory neurons by other types of mechanisms.

At least nine companies aim to reverse hearing loss that has already occurred by regenerating lost hair cells or synapses. The only regenerative program in the clinic is CGF166, a gene therapy from Novartis AG (NYSE:NVS; SIX:NOVN) and GenVec Inc. (NASDAQ:GNVC) that uses a recombinant adenovirus 5 (Ad5) vector to deliver the atonal homolog 1 (ATOH1; HATH1) transcription factor. Acousia Therapeutics GmbH, Audion Therapeutics B.V., Decibel Therapeutics Inc., Inception 3 Inc., Otologic Pharmaceutics Inc. and Otonomy each have undisclosed regenerative therapies in preclinical development not shown below.

Autifony Therapeutics Ltd. is the only company targeting the CNS component of hearing. AUT00063 modulates potassium channels in the brain to enhance central auditory processing.

The chart includes lead indication for each program. Those not specifically noted with "prevent" are intended to treat their respective indications. (A) Spiral Therapeutics Inc. has an option to BN201 and BN119 for inner ear disorders and anticipates making a decision by 3Q17; (B) GenVec Inc. is being acquired by Intrexon Corp. (NYSE:XON); (C) Phase I/II ongoing; JNK = c-jun N-terminal kinase; LXR = liver X receptor; PGF2 alpha = prostaglandin F2 alpha receptor; NFE2L2 = nuclear factor (erythroid-derived 2)-like 2 (NRF2); PPAR = peroxisome proliferation activated receptor; KCNC1 = potassium channel Kv3.1; APAF1 = apoptotic peptidase activating factor 1 (APAF1); SGK2 = serum/glucocorticoid regulated kinase 2; CDKN1B = cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor 1B; Source: BCIQ: BioCentury Online Intelligence, company press releases, company interviews

BC-Hearing_GFX_Piplelinepos_web_i.jpg

"
Thanks for this
 

Log in or register to get the full forum benefits!

Register

Register on Tinnitus Talk for free!

Register Now