Really!Oh really? So why there are two hair cell rows missing on the left? yeah the damage should depend on the pressure, some of them look broken, some of them look just tangled.
The missing rows have probably been missing for a long time when the picture was taken. I'm talking about the ones that are still there but are bent and entangled. I don't think they just snap off at the rootlet in an instant. The damage is likely progressive. The missing rows are most likely beyond repair. The underlying hair cells will die off eventually. All we can hope in is being able to artificially manipulate the remaining progenitor cells into generating new cells.
Right! And I think there are different levels of "damaged". Dead? Yes! Dead cells should not talk, just like dead people don't talk. But damaged cell, like 50% damaged? Hmm...And as for increased neural activity theory it is the most convincing to me, because damage hair cells should not transmit sound.
Right! You are not alone! I don't think scientists understand that either. I just listened to Dr. Will Sedley yesterday saying; "Where is tinnitus? Is it in the ears? Is it in the brain?" A man who has spent nearly 10 years now doing researching into tinnitus. They are as lost as we are!I just still don't understand which part of the brain is mostly responsible for generating the sound. Whether it is parts like CN/DCN or just neural pathway.
I think it was Dr. Susan Shore who first started investigating CN/DCN in tinnitus patients. I know she has done some very important work in tinnitus research, and I am also drawn towards believing in some of these ideas. You are naturally drawn to one idea or the other. But just because you like one idea more than the other doesn't prove anything. They still haven't cracked it yet!
More work obviously needs to be done. I think it's important that multiple scientists work on different leads. Perhaps, there is more to tinnitus than what meets the ear! To be able to do just that, more money is needed, and tinnitus needs to be brought higher up on the agenda.
The only risk of killing them all off is not being able to bring them all back again.I know this is a little ekstrem but what if you kill all you hair cell and then regenarate them all back with stem cells would that work ? then all the half broken ones would be gone but again that is maybe a little to riski
Welcome to year 2127! The age of Robocop!
It's like with a house that has been put through a fire. Do you try to repair what can be repaired, or is there no point doing that where it's much easier to wipe everything clean and start all over again using the blueprints?
I would also prefer to do a reboot and rebuild. But unlike with a house, the biological structures such as those found in the human cochlea are much more difficult to rebuild. Mainly because we still know very little about our own biology, and the biology of the ear, and our tools are still inadequate for what we are trying to do. But we are making progress though! We do that every day, and we have been doing it for several decades, and even centuries and millennia. Just think about where we come from.