The trial data they have is something, yes, but it's unreliable until it's been peer reviewed, everything we have heard in terms of outcomes statistically have all been from Neuromod. That's my question, we're coming up on October, why hasn't the peer review been released yet?So what about the trials? Or did they just imagine their tinnitus was on average 7.5dB lower in the TLM (Tinnitus Loudness Matching) tests in the safety study for example?
And, are you saying that you are happy to rely on the one or two testimonials we have for the Michigan and Minnesota devices though happy to completely disregard trials with over 500 patients?
How do you know that there is a link between temporary worsening of tinnitus and the effectiveness of the treatment?
Your statement regarding the testimonials is also false. Whilst I would agree there are a couple of strange ones in there most of the testimonials were actually very positive including the mention of volume reduction.
Unfortunately your post is the very definition of knee-jerk. No one has even finished the 12 week treatment yet...
I mean it all depends on what you were expecting though Glenn. If you were expecting a forum full of users with dramatic or complete tinnitus reduction then I'd say, respectfully, you were being a bit naive.It's still, as I said earlier, underwhelming.
For what it's worth I believe we should only really be comparing the other devices once we have peer reviewed trial results for all three.The trial data they have is something, yes, but it's unreliable until it's been peer reviewed, everything we have heard in terms of outcomes statistically have all been from Neuromod. That's my question, we're coming up on October, why hasn't the peer review been released yet?
As far as the Michigan / Minnesota trials go, you're correct in that we haven't had as many people try them, but what we have heard is that no one has had a direct increase. Not. One. Single. Worsening. Yes Dr. Susan Shore's sample size is VERY small, but the fact is everyone had gradual reduction and there were no worsenings. Which leads me to 3 conclusions:
First, Lenire does work, it is legit, it's just the earliest weakest form of bimodal stimulation. Perhaps Michigan and Minnesota have a superior input method in terms of stimulation. Perhaps Neuromod will improve Lenire in the near future to be more effective. I think this is the likely scenario. Let's remember that Neuromod basically rented out Hubert Lim's skills and knowledge here. So I doubt they didn't hire him for nothing, they probably knew the Minnesota device was really good or had great potential and wanted to make a commercial version that just is not "as up to par" as Lim's actual team's methodology.
Second, Lenire IS just as effective as Michigan's and Minnesota's method, it's just that the result appear "after the 10-12 week treatment". Again, perhaps slightly different input with different nerves causing different side effects. But I'm going to be honest, I can forgive not seeing much improvement at the six week mark, but we're coming up on 10 weeks now for the first users on October 2nd, and to be completely honest with you the results don't look too good. Again, I'm only saying this because we're almost at 10 weeks.
Third, it's another Desyncra, and we're getting juked again. Perhaps they know this and that's why they're withholding the peer review. They might be thinking "Oh crap, we should probably make some return for the investors before we release the review from other institutions".
The testimonials don't really have anything to do with the effectiveness of the device, I've said this myself far earlier in this thread. But Ruse, you have to admit, some of them REALLY do tiptoe around the question. It makes me somewhat curious if Neuromod told them to make their statements this way so people wouldn't get their hopes up beyond anything but "infinitesimal" improvement. Perhaps Ross O'Neill knows it's not that potent (yet). Again the device might work, it's just that it's the first to market and it's the weakest of the three. If that's true, I don't see a point in slugging out several grand for 2 months of hell, just to get a teeny tiny reduction. Just doesn't seem worth it to me. @Allan1967's incident was horrible, I don't want that to happen to any of us. But we have to remember it's in early stages, perhaps Neuromod will iron these kinks out in the near future.
Not me.I wonder when Neuromod will start contacting us about the 2020 appointments... Has anyone been contacted yet?
Less spiking which is nice, my hyperacusis also seems to be behaving - even around sounds that would usually trigger it. As for the overall volume, honestly, It's loud. My right ear has always been the prominent side with tinnitus but my left ear is now audibly louder. The increase in volume is unnerving but it's nothing that wasn't declared before starting treatment and should return back to baseline.
This is a great argument. If Neuromod just wanted to fleece customers, they would be going full blast and running a pill mill handing out nonrefundable devices to anyone who walks through a door, before enough people notice that it's a scam and the jig is up.I just can't help but wonder, how much money can realistically be made from a device that doesn't work before this becomes obvious to the general patient population?
Question for the mods, how many of those reporting in have hyperacusis? I've gotta imagine a few. So I'm not yet sold even on the above.Neuromod has absolutely no clue who will benefit and who will not, except for those with hyperacusis (super responders).
Neuromod said the majority of people should expect a statistically significant improvement above and beyond placebo. They aren't promising complete tinnitus elimination and there were months of discussions here where we all mentally prepped for that kind of result. Please try to avoid exaggerating where I've set the bar.I mean it all depends on what you were expecting though Glenn. If you were expecting a forum full of users with dramatic or complete tinnitus reduction then I'd say, respectfully, you were being a bit naive...
...Most people seem to get some sort of moderate reduction. And we aren't even at the end yet.
This is another thing, we know of course that not everyone is going to be a responder, I concede that, but the hyperacusis patients were said to have the best outcomes in the paper, so much so that they labeled them "super responders". It's generally accepted by Neuromod that this subgroup of tinnitus patients benefit the most from Lenire.Question for the mods, how many of those reporting in have hyperacusis? I've gotta imagine a few. So I'm not yet sold even on the above.
@Allan1967 certainly wasn't and isn't alone in this issue, and it's pretty terrifying how common it is, which is why waiting until they have it ironed out seems like a good idea at the moment.What I am worried about now is that @Cojackb is also reporting some tinnitus increase or am I wrong? Sorry I am German, and sometimes can not 100% follow your meanings.
Perhaps the tinnitus increase is because of Lenire or due to his change in lifestyle combined with anxiety etc.
But if anxiety plays a role, why is only one ear affected... not both?!
Again it comes down to the numbers. In TENT-A1 they defined statistically significant as 7 or 10 THI points of improvement, I can't remember which. When they say significant what they meant was these numbers. Significant in a statistical sense. Not significant as in a dramatic/life altering improvement. But simple a line in the sand, with placebo/no intervention sitting on one side and minimally effective treatment sitting on the other.Neuromod said the majority of people should expect a statistically significant improvement above and beyond placebo. They aren't promising complete tinnitus elimination and there were months of discussions here where we all mentally prepped for that kind of result.
These were your words exactly.They aren't promising complete tinnitus elimination and there were months of discussions here where we all mentally prepped for that kind of result.
Please try to avoid exaggerating where I've set the bar.
I'm genuinely not trying to catch you out Glenn. I was just pointing out that these "outliers" or dramatic improvers were rare in a testbed of 500 odd subjects. So not seeing one yet in a group of 10 isn't unusual or worrying.I am not trying to FUD Neuromod to death here but I have to admit being disappointed that we're this far downstream and not seeing more dramatic stories.
Again it comes down to expectations I think. I personally, am excited because 20 THI points from my 30-40 would be dramatic. That's assuming of course that I land in the majority of responders and inside the average improvement bracket. Someone with a baseline of 100 THI may have to have a long hard think about whether 20% is worth 2 grand? For some it will be. For others it may be best to wait a year and see how this thing pans out.Use some common sense. If after 12 weeks, NONE of the first batch of Tinnitus Talk users reporting in can report statistically significant improvement above and beyond placebo, we've got a problem. The sample size is large enough that at least a few should have success stories. I'm not really thrilled with
Maybe you should? I'm not trying to be mean but if you're this worried about it then maybe you should hold on to your cash and see how the dust settles.If I didn't have an appointment for early November already then I wouldn't feel hard-pressed to assess Neuromod now rather than a few months from now. But from my vantage point, and also considering the likelihood of a 2020 rollout in the US (should my concerns prove false) I will most likely cancel.
Haha, we have had that since the previous thread. By now I can just look at the username and immediately predict the tone of the reply with 90% certainty.Expect if that happens to the forum to take a predictable turn into daily snipes from team optimist vs. team skeptic.
There's more data to evaluate now vs. months ago. At some point that has to shift people's opinions.Haha, we have had that since the previous thread. By now I can just look at the username and immediately predict the tone of the reply with 90% certainty.
Neuromod did warn us; more than once. It's also in the manual.It is pretty underwhelming for several thousand along with 2 months of worsening, which isn't uncommon in the slightest, I'm also curious as to why Neuromod never warned patients about this when commercialization began, they MUST have had this happen to SOME people in the TENT-A1 and A2 trials, I don't recall them mentioning this, which also concerns me. If anyone can correct me here, I don't recall the data they showed mentioning the increase in volume during the initial phase of treatment.
Mostly tonal, but would get noisy when I'm stressed or tired. In head and ears, it varied.@Redknight sorry if this was mentioned already but what was your tinnitus like? Tonal or broadband/cricket and was it more in your ears or head?
THI doesn't measure the loudness of tinnitus. You can have mild tinnitus and be very bothered.Neuromod did warn us; more than once. It's also in the manual.
Only @Allan1967 has had a significant worsening since treatment started and he has had awful, unrelated issues, that are certainly factor into that worsening.
Some of the rest of us had mild worsening at the start and then benefits and some have had little benefit... You know, like the trial data showed.
It's important to remember what the leaked trial data showed; a general benefit of a few THI for most, with a few outliers who had fantastic results. A reduction of 10-12 THI for someone at 70 THI doesn't represent 40-50% noise reduction. It represents small changes, like the trial participants saw. Like, I notice my tinnitus less at work, or I get less irritated with my family.
It's hard to read the current wave of pessimism in this thread as I type now after my 3rd straight day of silence, preceded by weeks of drastically reduced volume. There will be those who write my reduction in volume off as "healing" or habituation, I can assure you this isn't habituation. Even if Lenire works best for new sufferers, is that not amazing news for future sufferers, even though it doesn't serve your own need?
Just my thoughts.
They told me last week they only have device fitting appointments for Tuesdays and Fridays. I don't know if it applies as well to the first assessment visit but I suspect yes unfortunately. All my follow up visits are on Fridays.Thank you @Redknight for clearing the waters. This thread can get so damn depressing and negative sometimes, and it's affecting me.
Is it really true Neuromod only sees people on two days each week? That little piece of information made me really worried that I will be on a waiting list for an extremely long time.
I'm really glad that Lenire is working out well for you @Redknight. However, I note from your profile that your tinnitus dates from March 2019. It is not at all unusual during the first months after tinnitus for it to decrease significantly and it is quite likely that this is what is happening here - Lenire simply assisting the habituation process. I'm going to have to see quite a lot more positive reviews and feedback from those who have had tinnitus for a longer period to be convinced that there is more to it than that. So far I haven't. It is as I said before "early days" but the reviews on the User Experience Thread suggest that your experience currently is more of an outlier.Neuromod did warn us; more than once. It's also in the manual.
Only @Allan1967 has had a significant worsening since treatment started and he has had awful, unrelated issues, that are certainly factor into that worsening.
Some of the rest of us had mild worsening at the start and then benefits and some have had little benefit... You know, like the trial data showed.
It's important to remember what the leaked trial data showed; a general benefit of a few THI for most, with a few outliers who had fantastic results. A reduction of 10-12 THI for someone at 70 THI doesn't represent 40-50% noise reduction. It represents small changes, like the trial participants saw. Like, I notice my tinnitus less at work, or I get less irritated with my family.
It's hard to read the current wave of pessimism in this thread as I type now after my 3rd straight day of silence, preceded by weeks of drastically reduced volume. There will be those who write my reduction in volume off as "healing" or habituation, I can assure you this isn't habituation. Even if Lenire works best for new sufferers, is that not amazing news for future sufferers, even though it doesn't serve your own need?
Just my thoughts.
The way I see it, either it proves successful and they will expand their services and start up new treatment centres which should shorten the waiting list or it doesn't work and you will be glad not to be on the waiting list at all.Is it really true Neuromod only sees people on two days each week? That little piece of information made me really worried that I will be on a waiting list for an extremely long time.
Thanks for explaining what THI is to me.THI doesn't measure the loudness of tinnitus. You can have mild tinnitus and be very bothered.
I can hear my tinnitus over street noise, in cars , but I am still able to sleep and concentrate.
My opinion is, if your tinnitus goes from loud to moderate, or from moderate to mild, that will be a huge improvement.