RunningMan
Member
- May 8, 2023
- 600
- Tinnitus Since
- HiFrq ~2000, Increased 2022, LoFrq ~2020
- Cause of Tinnitus
- Loud noise - clubs, stereos, cycles, headphones, engines,etc
Only the ITT includes ALL 99 study participants.Ah, you're right. I was looking at the "intent to treat" population graph when I should have been looking at the "per protocol" one. It's 70% of the group that actually got the treatment who had a "clinically meaningful" TFI score reduction. It was 60% of the initial population but a bunch of people dropped out for various reasons. I don't know why they include both in the report...
From the study for the Shore device:
For the full study group, active treatment resulted in 53% with clinically meaningful improvement while the control (placebo) group resulted in 20% with clinically meaningful improvement. For the fully study group, the active treatment was 33% points higher than the placebo. For the PP subset, active treatment was 40% points higher than the placebo. Also keep in mind that there was criteria for being included in the study that made it more likely it would work for those participants than a random sample of tinnitus sufferers. If you included more people with greater hearing loss, for example, the numbers would likely look less favorable.Further analysis revealed that the proportion of participants who demonstrated a clinically meaningful reduction in TFI score (13 points) was significantly greater at week 6 of phase 1 of active treatment (PP population: 65%vs ITT population: 53%; PP population P = .003) compared with control treatment (PP population: 25%vs ITT population: 20%; ITT population P = .004) (Figure 2C
and D).
Based on all the feedback from Lenire users, it was less effective than these numbers coming out of the Shore study.
Lenire User Experiences and Reviews