Congrats!!! Reduced tinnitus and a baby! Your whole life changed!I meant before the trial. but a new born baby girl doesn't help
Clare B also talked about how the older patients didn't get as much relief!I just pulled this from some research online. Again, not to be an ageist it is just an observation that it seems the older you are the less neuroplasticity works. I think you are probably fine in your 50s and below but, only a guess, it may not work as well after 60 or so. The testimonials kind of show that. I will keep researching, but I guess we don't know until we see some results or studies.
What surprises me more is why they chose to upload these testimonies on YouTube and not the ones like for example @Clare B's who is totally free of tinnitus after using the device? I don't really understand this way of advertising from Neuromod, is it to not get our hopes up too much? If I was the CEO of a company like this I would definitely show the patients with the best outcomes...But the two people talking about improvements didn't mention volume/loudness at all, one said his tinnitus didn't change at all and the other had tinnitus only for 4-5 months, so it could very well be natural improvement.
And being able to cope better mentally, though the tinnitus wasn't changed at all, is not a success story for me. You don't need to spend thousands of dollars on a device for that. If the tinnitus didn't change at all, that's not a success, that should be part of the 20% failure rate.
I'm still going to buy a device and test it out but these five videos didn't encourage me.
- Two people said their tinnitus didn't change but they can cope better mentally (not a success for me)
- Two people said they can hear it less but didn't mention loudness/volume (placebo?)
- One person had "major improvements" but he only had tinnitus for 4-5 months and didn't mention what he meant by it (natural improvement?)
But then if it didn't work for some, they would say it is false advertising and could face a potential lawsuit.What surprises me more is why they chose to upload these testimonies on YouTube and not the ones like for example @Clare B's who is totally free of tinnitus after using the device? I don't really understand this way of advertising from Neuromod, is it to not get our hopes up too much? If I was the CEO of a company like this I would definitely show the patients with the best outcomes...
Nope. Speculation and discussion. Status quo for weeks now.Do we have any new facts here?
96 pages in the meantime. I cannot read them all.
Seems a lot of discussion, speculation, but nothing new. Right?
I agree. I have no idea how these videos came about like they are, because it's just weird. But the footage and audio looks very good, so I'm sure they must have hired a production company, which makes this even weirder. If a bunch of lab nerds tried to do a video production of testimonials I would understand if it would be cringe and out of touch, but with a high technical production value like this, I have no idea what's going on.What surprises me more is why they chose to upload these testimonies on YouTube and not the ones like for example @Clare B's who is totally free of tinnitus after using the device? I don't really understand this way of advertising from Neuromod, is it to not get our hopes up too much? If I was the CEO of a company like this I would definitely show the patients with the best outcomes...
It is somewhat mystifying but whatever the reason this does leave Tinnitus Talk members rather better informed about the Neuromod device than before. This looks to be primarily a habituation device with maybe a few lucky participants in the trial achieving more.What surprises me more is why they chose to upload these testimonies on YouTube and not the ones like for example @Clare B's who is totally free of tinnitus after using the device? I don't really understand this way of advertising from Neuromod, is it to not get our hopes up too much? If I was the CEO of a company like this I would definitely show the patients with the best outcomes...
This is definitely not a habituation deviceIt is somewhat mystifying but whatever the reason this does leave Tinnitus Talk members rather better informed about the Neuromod device than before. This looks to be primarily a habituation device with maybe a few lucky participants in the trial achieving more.
And yet the woman in her 60s on the website testimonial apparently got cured... It seems all we can do is wait, throw a load of money at it and hope like hell. It's looking like a 20% chance it will help a bit taking into account the 10 or so testimonials we've seen. But this is a long way from a cure so unfortunately suicide is still the only alternative we have to living in permanent noise... Which kind of sucks.If there really is a link between neuroplasticity and age, then it would explain why Clare said the older patients didn't get much relief and explain why the older patients from the testimonials didn't get as good results.
This might have better odds of helping the younger you are.
Well it may not be marketed as such but the language those clinical trial participants on YouTube were talking was the language of habituation - coping with it better etc - not the language of cure.This is definitely not a habituation device
Check out this as ever very succinct summary from @Autumnly.
- Two people said their tinnitus didn't change but they can cope better mentally (not a success for me)
- Two people said they can hear it less but didn't mention loudness/volume (placebo?)
- One person had "major improvements" but he only had tinnitus for 4-5 months and didn't mention what he meant by it (natural improvement?)
Hubert is enjoying none of this. He's fully aware that he's either going to be deluged in @Paulmanlike knickers or whacked by a disgruntled nutbar... who goes by the name of Bam.Anyway, enjoying the speculation and debates. I am somewhat suspicious Neuromod are too.
So Neuromod is saying it helped 80% of the trial participants and you are saying it will help 20% based on what you've seen in this thread. Pretty big difference there.And yet the woman in her 60s on the website testimonial apparently got cured... It seems all we can do is wait, throw a load of money at it and hope like hell. It's looking like a 20% chance it will help a bit taking into account the 10 or so testimonials we've seen. But this is a long way from a cure so unfortunately suicide is still the only alternative we have to living in permanent noise... Which kind of sucks.
Just going off the testimonials. As @Autumnly concisely broke down only about 20% of them seemed to have some form of actual improvement in terms of volume. The rest of it was woeful wishy washy nonsense that as @david c pointed out reeked of habituation crap.So Neuromod is saying it helped 80% of the trial participants and you are saying it will help 20% based on what you've seen in this thread. Pretty big difference there.
Maybe that's why they took in Dr. Lim, to help make it work better.I'm starting to lean towards my initial gut reaction which is that the tech works but it will come in a better form from the Minnesota and Michigan devices.
Anyone care to give the dumbed down one-liner summary?http://stm.sciencemag.org/content/10/422/eaal3175.full
Susan Shore's results on Bimodal Stimulation. I imagine Neuromod would be similar.
Rofl.This is bimodal stimulation at its finest, they are simultaneously stimulating both our positive and negative expectations.