There's a very good chance it's already been submitted and is under FDA review as we speak. It just makes too much sense when considering the timeline of events.
You've got that right! I got my late b-day wish last year with the Phase II trial results being published, and all I wish for this Christmas is some major news from Auricle. I'm just keeping my fingers crossed and my chin up.
They were initially going to use 400 patients for the study. It was phased over a few years, so they wouldn't need 400 devices. However, I bet at least a couple of dozen are lying around.
Once it hits the market, do you want a team of scientists and engineers who designed the device to remain in control and continuously revise and improve it? Or would you like a 'distributor' that bought the rights to it that has no interest in how well it works, has no idea how it works, and wants to sell it for the maximum price?
I take it you won't be interested in the device if it were to hit the market? One less in the queue. That's fine for others, I'm sure.
Our support or lack thereof doesn't matter. We can't control their process and can only wait. And even after it's approved by the FDA and announced, Jon Pearson, CEO of Auricle, said commercialization of a product could be at a much later date. So he's setting expectations.
Yes, it just means you will need to wait longer, hopefully not several years in most places.
I'm sure people will quickly jump in the queue when they hear how well it works for others.
I think the reason some members think Auricle is going to go tits up is the very loose parallels they are drawing with Lenire. Look at things on individual merit.I had to Google "damp squib." It's always good to learn some British slang
This made my day. Did you actually get a tattoo?
They are probably in a similar frequency spectrum with different sounds, just like mine, which changes between a high-pitched ring and a high-frequency hiss. It doesn't have to match a specific single-tone frequency.
From my understanding, it works similarly to residual inhibition. For residual inhibition to work, you don't have to match your tinnitus sound exactly. You can go to a bar and listen to music, and your tinnitus can disappear for a while.
Agreed. Dr. Shore's device won't be the last 'device' or 'contraption' to claim to reduce tinnitus. I believe it may even be detrimental.
However, over 100 guinea pigs have already been used, and Dr. Shore has confirmed that not one worsened due to the treatment itself. The single worsening was caused by attending a rock concert while enrolled in the clinical trial.
Of course there does need to be a balance.
People are hyped because it's the only promising treatment that will be available in the (hopefully) near future.
Everyone else? LOL, you're on Jupiter for sure. Who else will there be but the highly motivated bunch that is us to test this thing? Get in line, try it out, and speak the truth if it works or not. I'm not sure what you're even cautioning for. I still have hyperacusis in one ear, which is potentially inner ear nerve damage that this device will not resolve. I will still give it a whirl as long as the sound stimulus is below my tolerance level.
The bottom line here is that without the device being launched, we only have second-hand data.
I agree with this, but not cynically. I will be watching Tinnitus Talk to see people's experience with the actual Auricle device; just as instructive as there aren't 100's of people flooding online forums saying Lenire helped them, I will gauge the responses here on whether the expense of this device is worth it for me.
Member
