I've contacted a close friend of mine who reside just outside of Seoul and is fully bilingual in English and Korean to check out the clinic in person and let me know if it appears legitimate or not
Just a small update. He told me it "appears legitimate" (ad verbatim quote) but he's going to look up patient feedback and see if he can contact anyone who has attended as well.
Just a small update. He told me it "appears legitimate" (ad verbatim quote) but he's going to look up patient feedback and see if he can contact anyone who has attended as well.
@Artemis2K
I checked my e-mail and sure enough he e-mailed me something. My buddy travels internationally for work so he had limited information as he has very limited time, so this is the last message he had sent me, and I probably won't hear from him for at least a few months unfortunately. Not too much info but intriguing. **** denotes name I've decided to keep out:
"Hey Ron, so as far as we can tell, this clinic is a legitimate clinic. **** even phoned to get the website information in Korean text, to verify it's legitimacy via Korean web searches. I am posting some of those links/URLs for your viewing's sake. If there is anything else we can do, let us know.
http://goldnose.co.kr/board/index.html?id=notice&no=44
http://goldnose.co.kr/main/page.html?pid=8
http://goldnose.co.kr/gallery/index.html?no=7"
Nice to hear back from youI dont think legitimacy is much of a question anymore.
Efficiency and professionalism are a huge question however.
You've done enough. Thank you.@Artemis2K
Yeah, I sent a message asking, if he does have the time (he is a husband/father as well... I'm an old college friend from Canada...), to see whatever else he could dig up... about the best we will get so far
That's true. Though, as far as efficiency is concerned, I think we've seen plenty to get the general idea. It's also the only thing publicly available, and there is nothing current to compare it to.I dont think legitimacy is much of a question anymore.
Efficiency and professionalism are a huge question however.
Well, yes and no , there is no data above 8 k .as far as efficiency is concerned, I think we've seen plenty to get the general idea.
Given that we have seen pictures of the clinic, the idea that someone was going to look at the outside or even look inside and provide new information is just funny at this point.Hey Ron, so as far as we can tell, this clinic is a legitimate clinic.
It's true there isn't another treatment to compare it to, but it is false to say there is nothing to compare it to more generally.and there is nothing current to compare it to.
If he were able to contact a large number of randomly sampled patients, that would be interesting. Otherwise, not so much.If he would've been able to contact some of the people who received treatment
Even having data above 8k is not helpful as long as he picks and chooses what to provide.Well, yes and no , there is no data above 8 k .
That is not acceptable when making a decision to use his services ,
That is correct.It's pretty clear that he is not going to provide the actual information that would be necessary to make a truly informed decision.
He's using mesenchymal SC from your own body he made it clear.Shim doesn't really divulge on his treatment protocol which makes this a big nono for me. I think he uses embryonic stem cells from fetuses. I read an article a few weeks ago where a guy who sought stem cell treatment was injected with these cells in his spine at a foreign clinic and some time later, when he was back in his own country doctors found a foreign, non-cancerous growth on his spine. That personally doesn't fill me with a great deal of confidence.
Don't forget that his primary means is growth factor, seemingly the one @vaka had been mentioning.Source is a mail he sent me : Its composed of some stem cells extracted in your own blood and bone marrow.
As far as I can tell, that is what people here are assuming without actual evidence.Don't forget that his primary means is growth factor,
And I wrote a post earlier in this thread explaining why MSCs are unlikely to do anything particularly useful in the ear. I'm open to published evidence that injecting adult MSCs has an effect on the inner ear.He's using mesenchymal SC from your own body he made it clear.
As far as I can tell, that is what people here are assuming without actual evidence.
And I wrote a post earlier in this thread explaining why MSCs are unlikely to do anything particularly useful in the ear. I'm open to published evidence that injecting adult MSCs has an effect on the inner ear.
That's why he says himself when you mailing him that the stem cells are not the primary active thing of his treatment and that the growth factors are. The reply is probably lost somewhere in this thread.
@Twitch, my opinion: I don't think whether the blinding was caused by the stem cells or the injections is the issue. It definitely was caused by a visit to this clinic, as it happened in three different people, all who had their treatments done very close together, immediately after their visits. This clinic was doing this procedure in an unsafe way, a way that US opthalmologists repeatedly have said should not be done with any experimental procedure. You never inject BOTH eyes unless you are pretty certain something is gonna work. Legitimate medical providers do not do this.@LadyDi I don't think that would have made a blot of difference. Injecting the cells directly into the eye probably had more to do with the blinding.