I'm not sure if it's really true that CBT (for tinnitus) gets that much funding, or that it somehow steals it away from other funding streams. From everything I've heard from researchers it does not appear cutting off funding for CBT automatically means increased funding for other research. It's more complicated than that.
If you look at the below listing of tinnitus studies being funded in the US:
http://grantome.com/search?q=tinnitus
You can see there's tons of non-psychological studies.
One thing that did in the past occur to me was that TRT had received $7.4M in funding. I talked about it here:
https://www.tinnitustalk.com/thread...training-therapy-where-are-the-results.13016/
But in retrospect it was good TRT was finally properly studied so that the decades-long debate of its efficacy could be put to rest. I'm not totally sure though if the price tag was reasonable or if it could have been done more cost effectively, but I'm not an expert at that.
With regards CBT, I in major parts agree with what
@Autumnly has posted. She is an awesome individual, always balanced and thoughtful, yet critical where it's due.
One thing to say though, I really dislike some people here being so vehemently against CBT that they are ready to go and harass and threaten CBT practitioners. Not naming names, but some of the CBT hate and how certain folk express it is so immature that I'm kind of embarrassed to even remotely be associated (by managing this community) with those kinds of actions. I strongly disapprove of any kind of harassment campaigns. It won't get anyone anywhere, but only hurt our common cause as people who matter start thinking we're nothing but some hooligans.
I actually think that we as a community need to behave better. It's an undisputed fact that CBT helps some people find ways to cope with the distress. And if someone comes here and tells their story, I don't want them to be treated like some sort of second-grade citizens for wanting to get better at any cost and then sharing that story in hopes of helping others. I'm so fed up seeing fellow tinnitus sufferers treating each other like garbage. It boggles the mind how some can't act civilly and respect another person's experiences without making a mockery of them.
I absolutely refuse our community to be a vehicle for CBT hate and deranged actions from those who can only see things in black and white. Above everything, people have to be able to feel safe here. To this end, the survey after our next one (which is a follow-up on our physical links survey, due to launch later this month) will be about tinnitus awareness, fundraising, and community atmosphere. We're going to find the issues in the community, what people feel happy about, and what are their concerns and suggestions for improvements. It's going to be candid. And we're going to listen to the people.
I think Tinnitus Hub, the organization behind Tinnitus Talk, needs to create a new refined mission statement. We don't support more funding going into research on CBT or psychological interventions. This needs to be made clear in our mission statement. We need to try to do better in terms of galvanizing the community; getting people do tasks that can help the cause. We can't expect most people to commit to volunteering several hours every week, so we need to come out with other options. Activism that doesn't require a lot of time, anyone can do, and something that motivates people. Easier said than done but we'll keep trying.
We must improve our moderation, and we look forward to adding some new moderators in 2020. If you are neutral, fair, have some history in the community, and aren't afraid of being strict where strictness is required, please PM me. Posts that make fun of people, or belittle their experiences must be acted on. Are we then less for free speech? I don't think so. It's just a matter of civility and decency. You can disagree, you can argue, you can think strongly, but it must be able to expressed in a way that doesn't drag the community spirit down. However, even if in some people's eyes we were less for free speech after this change, it is the cost that we must pay in order for the community to remain healthy, friendly, energetic and forward-looking. I will not allow this community to ever become something that doesn't represent our values. I have to say that over the past year or two I have been more involved in our other projects, and have rarely intervened in discussions, no matter how heated or inappropriate. And unfortunately, when I have had to intervene, it has sometimes come at a cost, I have been threatened, I have been disrespected. I feel sadness that some (albeit very few, thankfully) people are able to think that I would have anything else but the best intentions of our community and tinnitus sufferers in mind. I hope that those who have interacted with me over the years in various calls and meetings, were it patients, researchers, medical professionals, have been able to see that my heart really is set in this, and I will not rest until we have better treatments that factually reduce the loudness of tinnitus. I don't claim we've been perfect; but we have always tried the best we can. And we keep doing so.
But to be able to give our positive energy to these efforts, we need all of your help. The least everyone can do is try to think before submitting a post. "Would I talk like this to the person I'm writing to if they were in front of me?". That's a good first step.
Finally, we have come far. We have a few great volunteers. Considering our extremely limited resources, we've done and are engaged in quite a lot of projects. All of those who have been part of this can feel proud of themselves. Thank you.
I hope you will continue to support us.
Best wishes,
Markku