@Ed209 Agree with most of your post. One small remark though:
In short term, this is definitely true. Funds for CBT go into CBT - the issue concerning representation lies with those practitioners. But on the long term, these things are linked. As I mentioned my concern in an earlier post, once the world incorrectly "experiences" CBT as a cure, research in general could stop focusing on retrieving new insights in tinnitus, which would be a bad development. Therefore, the message of CBT not being a cure should remain clean.
I was delighted by a small part in
@Markku earlier post though:
I interpret this like:
"Tinnitus Hub wants to make it clear that CBT is not to be considered as a cure: and since a cure is what we're aiming for, we focus on supporting cure-related fundings."
Of course this is my way of interpretation, please correct me if I'm wrong.
Again, this does not mean that CBT is useless, far from it. As long as the outside world has a clean impression of what it stands for, CBT remains a good support bar for some of us and should be valued as such.