Relatively few compared to today. They just thought they were on the cusp of finding a cure back then. And in 2030 we might very well say that very few treatments were being researched way back in 2015 compared with today. In 2030 we might be talking about how naive they were back in 2015 to think they were on the cusp of finding a cure!Yeah, but what treatments were being researched back then [in the late 1990s]?
It's all relative.
Sure you did. If you didn't, you might have said Dr. Vernon was incorrect in his assessment. But calling him an "attention-seeker" takes it to a whole new level. You were wrong, which can happen to the best of us. But please don't say you didn't mean it!I didn't mean to call him an attention seeker
As I see it, even taking into account the trials to which you refer, tinnitus research is still relatively in its infancy - and a cure is a long long way off. Now let's hope I am as wrong about that as you were when you referred to Dr. Vernon as an attention-seeker.but you must admit it was foolish saying it back then if there was no active treatments being trialled...I mean Autifony, AM-101 and others are being trialled, so that 5-10 mark is more believable vs back then.