I wouldn't bet the farm on the election of either of them. Trump is very, very good at getting what he wants.
I mean, that's your right. And I agree, I wouldn't bet much in this election.
What are your problems with Trump that you would consider voting for another candidate?
Yes, SOMETIMES, but most definitely not all or even MOST times. I would say that politics, in general, falls into the most times category.
I daily look for new conferences etc from Biden to listen to him, but they are coming thin and slow. It seems they are pacing him or scared of what he will say next. The Dems may well be falling into the same trap as they did with Clinton.
I've only every watched Rogan's podcasts a few times, and I've never really pinpointed where his beliefs place him. But, I could give you two sets of 10 of my beliefs; from one set you would think I'm a leftie, from the other a righty. Maybe this is why I have never voted. Some people are more fluid. I doubt he changes position for fame, he's got enough of that, but who knows. I find him a bit overbearing and only watch if he has a guest I'm interested in listening to.
Trump election ad uses stock military image 'featuring Russian fighter jets'
By nominating Biden in the first place, they set themselves up for failure. Their next major mistake, was nominating Harris for VP. If they lose, they have nobody to blame but themselves.
I live in New York, which the Democrats are much friendlier towards. Trump is heavily opposed by the governor, and the mayor of NYC. If Biden wins, New York will probably be better off, but his overall platform, mental health, and his choice of VP, are some of the reasons that I will not consider voting for the Democratic party in this election. I dislike Biden's Trump-hating supporters, more than Biden himself. I think Trump has done an excellent job, the Democrats are in very bad shape, so I will likely be voting Republican in this election. Maybe Biden will do fine in the debates, I'm open to listening.
That's interesting that the TV debates have any ability to persuade you. You are in the minority per this study:
Trump's base are anti-intellectuals. They are hardly Scientific American's demographic. Regardless of how unprecedented this move may be, they're still preaching to the converted.
The head of Scientific American is Trump- hater Laura Helmuth, who graduated from the most left-wing college in the United States, the University of California at Berkeley, in 1997.
Do you love Lincoln as much as Helmuth does? Do you agree with her that Lincoln was, "...the best president ever"? Is this birdbrain Laura Helmuth capable of understanding that if war-monger Lincoln had simply let the South secede, or negotiated with them, the Civil War would have likely been averted, 750,000 men would not have been killed, millions of children would not have have been left fatherless, hundreds of thousands of women would not have been widowed, and Trump would never have been elected to the office of President of the United States in 2016? Having a high IQ and a P.h.D. from Berkeley, is not a guarantee that somebody has common sense, or compassion for the victims of leaders like Lincoln.
I don't idolize Lincoln or any other president but I think he was in a tough spot and I don't think prolonging slavery was the answer. I don't subscribe to the idea that "slavery wasn't that bad" to warrant war or that lack of suicide is proof of that.
You're right about the limited impact of Scientific American on people who almost have a religious belief in the Ubermensch called Donald J. Trump. I thought it might also appeal to a broader base of independents and moderate Republicans who are not shy of looking at strong scientific facts like man made global warming, but maybe this won't be enough to be a game changer as the Lincoln project.
Do you think that 750,000 men had to die? Did birdbrain, latte drinking, far left Laura Helmuth ever pick up a gun and kill or be killed? No, of course not. She feels that men are simply cannon fodder because, well, that's the politically correct way for a brilliant, man-hating, modern feminist like her to think. She would not even think twice, if you asked her which was worse - the deaths of many hundreds of thousands of men in the Civil War, or 123 women in the NYC Triangle shirt factory fire of 1911. The Civil War soldiers who died, HAD to die, according to people like her. There simply wasn't another way, in their brainwashed pea brains.
The Lincoln Project is also effective because they fight like Republicans (they have said as much themselves) and are willing to go low and say blunt things like "Trump is a vile human being and a sociopath and doesn't give a shit if you die" without *any* sugar coating. This tactic works in US politics where to a certain percentage of people this tone reflects "telling it like it is."
Ya know, a lot of people across the political spectrum praise Lincoln. Donald Trump himself gave a speech recently praising him. That doesn't make him good of course but I don't think Helmuth likes him because she hates men or think their lives are worthless. Unless President Trump also thinks that, which maybe he does since he broke his campaign promise to resist war.
Trump has both mocked and praised Lincoln just like he does with everything else so he can quote one or the other whenever it benefits him.
What signs are you referring to?Laura Helmuth, of Scientific American, shows every sign of being a Latte drinking male-hating feminist. If the feminists are so "uppity", then why has no woman ever been drafted, in the entire history of our country, even to perform easy, safe, non-combat service? There are women who have volunteered for the military, I'll give them that, but it's a very small minority. Men are expected to do everything, devote their lives to women and children, yet have fewer and fewer rights, as time passes. The average man with children is totally screwed. Those who don't know any better, and that is the majority, are chumps. Hopefully, there will be a re- awaking of what it is to be a man, little by little, rather than a slave to the feminist-orientated culture we've created. Rant continues below, lol.
If a man is a Latte drinking, pro-feminist, Lincoln-loving, self hating house male, he is a traitor to his own sex. He will be affected by TDS, 100%, 24/7. Such men will dutifully vote for Biden and Harris.
Many of the women who supposedly hate Trump would drop everything to marry him, even if it was only for long enough to obtain a huge settlement after the divorce. I cannot prove this, but I've been around the block enough times, that I can say this without hesitation.
The irony for men who view women as unprincipled gold diggers is that if that is your view of women, the only women who will stick around (and can stand to be around that bs) are the ones who want something in exchange for their company. In other words, you are selecting specifically for that kind of woman and then using that bias you have set up to generalize.Laura Helmuth, of Scientific American, shows every sign of being a Latte drinking male-hating feminist. If the feminists are so "uppity", then why has no woman ever been drafted, in the entire history of our country, even to perform easy, safe, non-combat service? There are women who have volunteered for the military, I'll give them that, but it's a very small minority. Men are expected to do everything, devote their lives to women and children, yet have fewer and fewer rights, as time passes. The average man with children is totally screwed. Those who don't know any better, and that is the majority, are chumps. Hopefully, there will be a re- awaking of what it is to be a man, little by little, rather than a slave to the feminist-orientated culture we've created. Rant continues below, lol.
If a man is a Latte drinking, pro-feminist, Lincoln-loving, self hating house male, he is a traitor to his own sex. He will be affected by TDS, 100%, 24/7. Such men will dutifully vote for Biden and Harris. The latter, earlier today, made a remark, "A Harris administration, together with Joe Biden as the president of the United States..." A Freudian slip, perhaps? How about Biden saying, "Harris-Biden administration", a few hours later? You can't make this kind of thing up, it's all over the news.
Many of the women who supposedly hate Trump would drop everything to marry him, even if it was only for long enough to obtain a huge settlement after the divorce. I cannot prove this, but I've been around the block enough times, that I can say this without hesitation.
Member
