Agnostics “R” Us...

Interesting question.

Perhaps all religious constructs are the stuff of mythology - and human 'Love' is all there is.
Were the Beatles right after all?
So - no Heavenly Father to look after us and no 'big brother' to spy on us, and no day of judgement.
Is the concept of a heavenly afterlife nothing more than comforting wishful thinking?
Are prayers even relevant?
Of course - nobody knows.
People may 'think' they know.
You can probably guess what I think, but what do you think?
(Answers on a postcard.)
I totally agree all religious constructs are the stuff of mythology. I have always liked the assertion that life is empty and meaningless and it does not mean anything that life is empty and meaningless. Love and I would add compassion which is a cousin of love to the mix of giving meaning into life.
 
I totally agree all religious constructs are the stuff of mythology. I have always liked the assertion that life is empty and meaningless and it does not mean anything that life is empty and meaningless. Love and I would add compassion which is a cousin of love to the mix of giving meaning into life.
Spot on Henry.
 
5518F1F5-47F0-4EFE-8576-A1DD446EA36C.jpeg
 
Love this one.

We have Matthew's gospel to thank for his description of hell, when unbelievers will be cast into lakes of fire. Some loving Heavenly Father?

63410D2B-378A-4D4E-8B1D-C7EEA6AD1F38.jpeg
 
An Atheist is "without theism", which simply means that they do not believe there there are books or other teachings which are divinely inspired, and that no human being has ever communicated with a god or gods. This generally means that the Atheist has seen no evidence for the existence of the supernatural, divinity, etc., therefore does not subscribe to a belief system based on religion. An online definition from Merriam-Webster: a person who does not believe in the existence of a god or any gods : one who subscribes to or advocates atheism

An Agnostic does not profess to know whether the supernatural exists, or not. An online definition: a person who believes that nothing is known or can be known of the existence or nature of God or of anything beyond material phenomena; a person who claims neither faith nor disbelief in God.
 
An Atheist is "without theism", which simply means that they do not believe there there are books or other teachings which are divinely inspired, and that no human being has ever communicated with a god or gods. This generally means that the Atheist has seen no evidence for the existence of the supernatural, divinity, etc., therefore does not subscribe to a belief system based on religion. An online definition from Merriam-Webster: a person who does not believe in the existence of a god or any gods : one who subscribes to or advocates atheism

An Agnostic does not profess to know whether the supernatural exists, or not. An online definition: a person who believes that nothing is known or can be known of the existence or nature of God or of anything beyond material phenomena; a person who claims neither faith nor disbelief in God.
@Luman, I consider myself agnostic, because I accept that I cannot know why I am, or what becomes of me when I am not.

In the case of this meme however, I'm quite certain it is addressing the de facto definition of an atheist, who in most cases would assert that "there is/are no God(s)" (whether believed to exist by an organised/conventional religion, or not), and while I don't rule it out, I feel that those who state it with absolute certainty are even less credible than those who are stubbornly convinced of the opposite.
'Nonsense.'
"The science" (that those who refute the existence of (a) God(s) draw the entirety of their beliefs from) has already been done on this, and the chances of life occurring randomly were estimated to be around 1 in 10^40000. To give some perspective: that would be like one person (in their lifetime) winning the lottery jackpot 10^3990 times (and that's an underestimate). Put simply, I have more chance of waking up tomorrow, tinnitus free, with the ability to fire destructive laser beams from my fingertips.

So if we are to believe the above given scenario to be "impossible", then we would have to conclude that our existence upon this earth being a mere fluke, is also "impossible"; thus an atheist must acknowledge themselves and their being, according to the laws of probability, to be an anomaly, or put another way, "irrational".
 
@Luman, I consider myself agnostic, because I accept that I cannot know why I am, or what becomes of me when I am not.

In the case of this meme however, I'm quite certain it is addressing the de facto definition of an atheist, who in most cases would assert that "there is/are no God(s)" (whether believed to exist by an organised/conventional religion, or not), and while I don't rule it out, I feel that those who state it with absolute certainty are even less credible than those who are stubbornly convinced of the opposite.

"The science" (that those who refute the existence of (a) God(s) draw the entirety of their beliefs from) has already been done on this, and the chances of life occurring randomly were estimated to be around 1 in 10^40000. To give some perspective: that would be like one person (in their lifetime) winning the lottery jackpot 10^3990 times (and that's an underestimate). Put simply, I have more chance of waking up tomorrow, tinnitus free, with the ability to fire destructive laser beams from my fingertips.

So if we are to believe the above given scenario to be "impossible", then we would have to conclude that our existence upon this earth being a mere fluke, is also "impossible"; thus an atheist must acknowledge themselves and their being, according to the laws of probability, to be an anomaly, or put another way, "irrational".
Indeed that was helpful and an exercise in thinking things through deeply. I found a really great website with a lot of links to flesh things out titled: "Arguments Against the Existence of God (Overview)". It is part of an online course on the Philosophy of Religion. Thought folks might find that interesting.
 
Few days back the wife and I were walking and we stopped at our usual place, a bridge over running river. Wife said you know when people die, someone will open all the doors and windows to let the dead person's soul out, do you know if we actually have a soul and where is it located in our bodies?

I had to think about that. So I said, I personally don't think we have what we call a soul in a solid form in our bodies that needs to be let out and which becomes invisible when exiting. My thoughts on that is that religion has invented this soul and it's used to put more money in the basket at funerals. There was no argument on that.

Although the wife was one of those who had Catholic religion shoved down her throat from the day of birth.
 
We cannot know whether there is a God or not as that would be too easy.

Some say they know but what they really have is faith.

The philosophical arguments for God are easy to dismiss.

For me I keep an open mind.

This universe is full of mysteries. We know very little and perhaps we only ever can know very little given our sensory limitations.

If there is a loving God I will be very pleased to meet Him/Her.

If there is a malevolent God who puts you in hell because you don't praise him/her and love them all the time well I'm not so sure we'd get on.

I like the Dalai Lama's approach to religion. They are different ways to reach the same place. Compassion.
 
We cannot know whether there is a God or not as that would be too easy.

Some say they know but what they really have is faith.

The philosophical arguments for God are easy to dismiss.

For me I keep an open mind.

This universe is full of mysteries. We know very little and perhaps we only ever can know very little given our sensory limitations.

If there is a loving God I will be very pleased to meet Him/Her.

If there is a malevolent God who puts you in hell because you don't praise him/her and love them all the time well I'm not so sure we'd get on.

I like the Dalai Lama's approach to religion. They are different ways to reach the same place. Compassion.
A nice way to be thinking I would say.

As for the philosophical arguments for God are easy to dismiss, well, I thought you and others might enjoy seeing this:

Arguments Against the Existence of God (Overview)

Indeed, keeping an open mind is a great space to inhabit has been my experience although challenging at times as well since human nature seems to be wired to have us take positions that make others wrong and/or delude ourselves.

As for meeting God after death I have thought for some time that is one of the benefits of dying (of which there are few) is the possibility of meeting God assuming God is not much like the Abrahamic types of God anyway.
 
Few days back the wife and I were walking and we stopped at our usual place, a bridge over running river. Wife said you know when people die, someone will open all the doors and windows to let the dead person's soul out, do you know if we actually have a soul and where is it located in our bodies?

I had to think about that. So I said, I personally don't think we have what we call a soul in a solid form in our bodies that needs to be let out and which becomes invisible when exiting. My thoughts on that is that religion has invented this soul and it's used to put more money in the basket at funerals. There was no argument on that.

Although the wife was one of those who had Catholic religion shoved down her throat from the day of birth.
@Jazzer, I was hoping someone could add some light to the subject of the soul and who said it's a real object.
 
A nice way to be thinking I would say.

As for the philosophical arguments for God are easy to dismiss, well, I thought you and others might enjoy seeing this:

Arguments Against the Existence of God (Overview)

Indeed, keeping an open mind is a great space to inhabit has been my experience although challenging at times as well since human nature seems to be wired to have us take positions that make others wrong and/or delude ourselves.

As for meeting God after death I have thought for some time that is one of the benefits of dying (of which there are few) is the possibility of meeting God assuming God is not much like the Abrahamic types of God anyway.
Some interesting stuff to follow up there Henry.
 
I was hoping someone could add some light to the subject of the soul and who said it's a real object.
Hey @Elmer B Fuddled -- So often I've thought about chiming in on this thread--and I have have. But I'm always a bit hesitant to share some of the things I've come to believe, because of not wanting to in anyway contradict what anybody else might believe about spirituality.

But you seem to be keenly interested in "the nature of Soul", and so thought I'd leave some information from the website of my own chosen spiritual path (Eckankar). I think it touches on the nature of Soul about as well as anything else I've run across. If it intrigues you, you can search on other topics at the website, such as Soul Travel, Spiritual Freedom, etc. I myself think Eckankar has an almost endlessly fascinating array to topics which can be studied and explored.

The Hero's Journey
 
Hey @Elmer B Fuddled -- So often I've thought about chiming in on this thread--and I have have. But I'm always a bit hesitant to share some of the things I've come to believe, because of not wanting to in anyway contradict what anybody else might believe about spirituality.
Good of you to take the leap and share. I ran across Eckankar about 40 years ago. Interesting approach. Some very smart people I knew participated in that approach. Not for me of course although around that time I was heavy into the Seth Material and Edgar Cayce.
 
I like the Dalai Lama's approach to religion. They are different ways to reach the same place. Compassion.
The Dali Lama is a supporter of religion, which is the worst thing that man ever invented. His predecessors were some of the most brutal, violent oppressors in history - compassion for their own priest class was the only type they knew. It was good that this lying priest was deposed from his position, even by the Chinese communists. His bizarre beliefs about his birthright, himself being "enlightened" and better than the rest of us, have no basis in science or rationality. No Athiest, Humanist, Agnostic, etc., should have any admiration for him, on any level. His profession has been absolute poison to humanity. The faster his type disappears from the face of the earth, the better.

2015-07-10-NYC-G18-3comitt.jpg
 
The Dali Lama is a supporter of religion, which is the worst thing that man ever invented. His predecessors were some of the most brutal, violent oppressors in history - compassion for their own priest class was the only type they knew. It was good that this lying priest was deposed from his position, even by the Chinese communists. His bizarre beliefs about his birthright, himself being "enlightened" and better than the rest of us, have no basis in science or rationality. No Athiest, Humanist, Agnostic, etc., should have any admiration for him, on any level. His profession has been absolute poison to humanity. The faster his type disappears from the face of the earth, the better.

View attachment 48519
Well, you are a person of definite opinions seems to me. I am much less certain that my opinions are the right ones. I can think of worse things than religion. I am certain the some religions and religious people have done and do good things in the world. I am sure that at least some and maybe even most of his predecessors were brutal, violent and oppressors but probably not beyond what happened in other times/areas of the world. I do admire this quote from the Dali Lama for example:

"If scientific analysis were conclusively to demonstrate certain claims in Buddhism to be false, then we must accept the findings of science and abandon those claims."

I also like this one:

"Whether you believe in God or not does not matter so much, whether you believe in Buddha or not does not matter so much; as a Buddhist, whether you believe in reincarnation or not does not matter so much. You must lead a good life. And a good life does not mean just good food, good clothes, good shelter. These are not sufficient. A good motivation is what is needed: compassion, without dogmatism, without complicated philosophy; just understanding that others are human brothers and sisters and respecting their rights and human dignity."

I don't think you would hear most religious leaders say things of this nature.
 
Well, you are a person of definite opinions seems to me. I am much less certain that my opinions are the right ones. I can think of worse things than religion. I am certain the some religions and religious people have done and do good things in the world. I am sure that at least some and maybe even most of his predecessors were brutal, violent and oppressors but probably not beyond what happened in other times/areas of the world. I do admire this quote from the Dali Lama for example:

"If scientific analysis were conclusively to demonstrate certain claims in Buddhism to be false, then we must accept the findings of science and abandon those claims."

I also like this one:

"Whether you believe in God or not does not matter so much, whether you believe in Buddha or not does not matter so much; as a Buddhist, whether you believe in reincarnation or not does not matter so much. You must lead a good life. And a good life does not mean just good food, good clothes, good shelter. These are not sufficient. A good motivation is what is needed: compassion, without dogmatism, without complicated philosophy; just understanding that others are human brothers and sisters and respecting their rights and human dignity."

I don't think you would hear most religious leaders say things of this nature.
The only reason that he says things like that, is because he is not running Tibet and has to appeal to Western people. If it were his choice, he'd return the country to serfdom, illiteracy, and oppression. Do you believe that he was born divine, the way he does? If he had any self-respect, even a tiny amount, and a degree of intelligence and honesty, he would renounce his religion and its bloody history. Modern adults do not need idiots like him to tell them that we should be nice to each other. This is an insult to the intelligence of those who listen to people like him. There was 95% illiteracy in Tibet during the time that Dali Lamas ran Tibet with no medical care, mutilations and executions for minor offenses, etc. They were barbaric savages, with riches and power. He was made a proud member of their ranks who would likely be the exact same way if he was in charge and permitted to do what all of his predecessors did. You can sugarcoat him all you like, but he nothing more than a lying, clever, deceptive priest, at heart.

The Net Worth of the Dali Lama is estimated to be one hundred fifty million dollars.
 
"His Holiness" Dalai Lama believes that he is a God, an incarnation of a deity called Avalokiteshvara. In the highly unlikely event that I was to meet him, I would explain to him that he is no different than anybody else, just a human being who was chosen by barbarian religious tyrants to be regarded by the people of Tibet as the latest incarnation of this fictitious entity. I would further explain that if he believes in all of this Avalokiteshvara nonsense, he is either stupid or insane.
 
The only reason that he says things like that, is because he is not running Tibet and has to appeal to Western people. If it were his choice, he'd return the country to serfdom, illiteracy, and oppression. Do you believe that he was born divine, the way he does? If he had any self-respect, even a tiny amount, and a degree of intelligence and honesty, he would renounce his religion and its bloody history. Modern adults do not need idiots like him to tell them that we should be nice to each other. This is an insult to the intelligence of those who listen to people like him. There was 95% illiteracy in Tibet during the time that Dali Lamas ran Tibet with no medical care, mutilations and executions for minor offenses, etc. They were barbaric savages, with riches and power. He was made a proud member of their ranks who would likely be the exact same way if he was in charge and permitted to do what all of his predecessors did. You can sugarcoat him all you like, but he nothing more than a lying, clever, deceptive priest, at heart.

The Net Worth of the Dali Lama is estimated to be one hundred fifty million dollars.
Well let's see. Where to start. Who are you going to believe:

This page reports his net worth is $1.

This page reports his net worth is $150M as do many others .

Then if he is worth $150M, then what is he doing or going to do with all that money? The guy is like 86 and not in great health. He lives much like the Pope who lives in quarters with other priests in Vatican City. Pope Francis won't live in the Papal quarters. What would you say Pope Francis is worth? These guys are basically good human beings who are not living large seems to me. Then you may be right they are both just grifters. I just don't have the same view as you do. You think he is lying and I think he is s good guy.

He does not think he is divine it seems from what he says. He has been asked many times does he think he is a god and he says he is just a Lama (which means a priest or monk in English). Sometimes he says he is just a human being.

Plenty of political and religious leaders have never owned up to "bloody history". No USA President apologized to the Native Americans for the genocide of their people (among many other things the USA needs to apologize for in my mind). I don't think the Queen of England or a Prime Minister has apologized for the excesses of the British colonial era (not totally sure of that one). Has the Pope apologized for the Inquisition? The Mullahs apologized for the excesses of Mohammed? I think not but I could be wrong about that. I would agree it would be great if he did and maybe he has for all I know. He has apologized for a sexist remark he made a year or two ago... after all he is just human.

Yes, you may be right had the world not intruded on Tibet in the 1940s and 1950s he might have been as bad as the others. Then maybe not. We can't know the answer to that one.

So I guess we will have to agree to disagree. I would be interested to know if you think any institutions or any particular people are doing good things in the world.
 
For me, the 'god' conundrum is perfectly straightforward.

I'll be brief.

My infancy/childhood was one of isolation, neglect and abuse.

I prayed my heart out for help.

If this god is all knowing - he would have known;
all loving, and he would have loved me better.

Instead of which I suffered years of mental illness, schizoid phenomena, depression, psychiatric drugs, psychotherapy, etc... until I eventually discharged myself to escape the threat of ECT.

I can see no evidence for god, and I lack the imagination to 'think one up.'

Dave x
Jazzer
 
I can see no evidence for god, and I lack the imagination to 'think one up.'
I am an atheist. If people ask why, I usually say something like this: I'm not convinced.

Nothing I've been shown or told that has convinced me. No "evidence" (scriptures, figures, documents) that has convinced me. I don't think people realize that belief/disbelief, conviction/skepticism, is not a choice. I remember when I was young I prayed, even though I doubted and didn't really understand the whole concept of God, religion, etc. I only did it because I was told it would help me. As I got older and realized I didn't have faith, I didn't feel the way others felt, I started to panic. It was a stark difference between me and everyone I knew. It was like a tea that everyone said was the most amazing tea they've tasted and when I tried to access that spiritual part of myself it was not awakened, it was not even dead. It just simply did not exist at all.

If I ever came close to the feelings of spirituality, it was through science and nature... the knowledge that we are connected through being living beings and our experience of life. But I take a more humanistic approach. I still don't understand faith and why people have it. I don't understand what they feel or why, when to me it's completely unconvincing. I didn't chose to be unconvinced or an atheist. I just am. Maybe there is something in the psychology of people that gives us different requirements for belief. I've always been interested in the topic of belief and why we seem to have different standards for belief to happen.
 
For me, the 'god' conundrum is perfectly straightforward.

I'll be brief.

My infancy/childhood was one of isolation, neglect and abuse.

I prayed my heart out for help.

If this god is all knowing - he would have known;
all loving, and he would have loved me better.

Instead of which I suffered years of mental illness, schizoid phenomena, depression, psychiatric drugs, psychotherapy, etc... until I eventually discharged myself to escape the threat of ECT.

I can see no evidence for god, and I lack the imagination to 'think one up.'

Dave x
Jazzer
Sorry to read of the tough cards you were dealt in life. Sounds like you have come through in a positive way though from your tough times. I know in many ways I benefited from some good cards in life to start with. Nothing fair about that to be sure. Hard for me to imagine a "good" god would create a world the way this one works. Maybe indeed humans are just not capable of understanding the ways of a god... who knows.

I have at times looked back on the pre Vatican II conservative Catholic Church of that time with me going to a Catholic School with little ability to think critically as a child it was a nice bubble to be in. Lots of certainty (no ambiguity or gray areas), knowing what the rules are, feeling safe, feeling like one was where one belonged with people who all belonged, imaginary friends that felt real, etc. It was living in ignorance inside of a fantasy but I sure did not know that at the time. At times in my adult life I have been angry about the BS and indoctrination I was filled with. At times in my adult life I wished I had not lost or escaped that fantasy but still lived in it like some of the very religious do. Living with the unknown is not always comfortable. Particularly as one is in the mid to late autumn of life as I am close to the end of the line. It would be nice if I was pleasantly surprised to find a "good god" saying hello on the other side, it will be a big WTF if the wrathful god of the old testament shows up, but I figure the odds are when the lights go out that it is as Bugs Bunny says baada, baada, baada, that's all folks.

Henry
 

Log in or register to get the full forum benefits!

Register

Register on Tinnitus Talk for free!

Register Now