I've followed up on this now.@Markku Is it now safe to say that Autifony won't be answering our Q&(A)???
They are a very small team and extremely busy so we'll see.
Thanks for the reminder
I've followed up on this now.@Markku Is it now safe to say that Autifony won't be answering our Q&(A)???
We won't get it in 2016. Probably not even 2017. I think 2018-2020 is a realistic goal for Autifony's pill to hit the market if all testing goes well.
Yeah it's impossible to say. There likely won't be anyone that will have tried both until it comes to market, and even if Aut doesn't work for someone that took trobalt doesn't mean theres any correlation.How will anyone know? Some will say that it is working on the same principle of Autifony plus taking it earlier may help rather than waiting for autifony. Others can say that it alters the brain and may make autifony not efficient or so efficient. Just something to ponder but I fear there is no answer to this question but one worth asking anyway......
Trobalt is a dangerous drug but one that may save a life or lives cos this ailment is a killer mentally....and has effects physically too...
@Markku Is it now safe to say that Autifony won't be answering our Q&(A)???
Autifony came back to me.I've followed up on this now.
They are a very small team and extremely busy so we'll see.
Thanks for the reminder
This is a very good question indeedBy using AUT00063 to correct the activity of these neurons, the clinical researchers hope to reverse this early stage of tinnitus development and prevent longer term tinnitus-related changes in the brain.
I thought Aut was being developed for people that have had chronic T. This drug seems like it's only aimed at people in the early stages of T (I know 6-18 months is what they are testing). How much hope do we really have for everyone else? Feeling a little sad reading this
I did not see the dr, my opinion is he means it is designed to be a short term fix not a long term treatment."Is going to be" the same as if he would say that he has seen the drug working in the trial?
that would be a dream come true but I think too optimistic since phase 2b and phase 3 have to be done yet, then permission granted, then production.Hope they will reach some fast track release in UK (if all goes well), as it is more common approval than in USA by FDA.
So optimism that it will be on the market at Q4 2017, or Q1, Q2 of 2018 is not unrealistic...
We will see...
Good point!Was trobalt only developed for the early stage of epilepsy ? I think the answer is No.
My other question is, why aren't they testing acute tinnitus in the phase two trial? What if Autifony works for Acute T but not Chronic T? They might get stopped at phase two for something that cures acute T but isn't great for chronic T!
How long did Lady D have it before she tried autifony? as she described an improvement with it plus another chap reported that he also benefitted with autifony - how long did he have it before the trial? Interesting to find out....So, hope for all of us that results for the people that had it 6 months are same as for those who had t for 18 months.
Because if u test on less than 6/months u wont know if it was the drug or spontaneous recovery!!!!!!My other question is, why aren't they testing acute tinnitus in the phase two trial? What if Autifony works for Acute T but not Chronic T? They might get stopped at phase two for something that cures acute T but isn't great for chronic T!
How long did Lady D have it before she tried autifony? as she described an improvement with it plus another chap reported that he also benefitted with autifony - how long did he have it before the trial? Interesting to find out....
Lady D posted on the TT board and so did the other personAUT research team is obviously doing great job discourage participants to share information on TT or anywhere else...
Lady D posted on the TT board and so did the other person
Just wanted to add, at no point during the screening process do they ask what caused your tinnitus. So I'm not convinced it is just for noise induced T. If that was the case surely that would be part of the inclusion criteria ?