Will give you an analogy looking to the future. Driverless cars are the future. In thirty years, people won't be behind the wheel. You will call up your car ride to your door on your computer...likely by voice command. A news flash. All technology is fallible. Guess what? These cars will kill people, just like airbags do. That's right, driverless cars will kill people. But....currently conventional automotive transporation kills 30,000 per year in America like clockwork....many even with airbag technology. Driverless cars will kill MUCH fewer. But, this technology will fail from time to time, accidents will occur and people will be killed by this new technology as well.
Yes, I know this. Being a software engineer myself I know how many things can go wrong within a system. Often these are a result of human error or unforeseen exceptions taking place in unforeseen scenarios. My point however was, that the only problem I had with airbags is that such scenarios CAN and WILL take place (in the beginnings usually more often than when the technology has been around for some time and its flaws ironed out), compared to the scenario where you would have gotten away unscathed if such technology was not present. That is regrettable and hence I said we should keep improving the technology rather than deactivate it.
I can however understand the people who got involved in minor low-collision accidents (perhaps they were early-adopters of this technology), had their airbags deployed giving them hearing loss, and consequently wishing they deactivated their airbags. It is not a rational thing to do, but we all know most Tinnitus sufferers go through the "what if" phase when acquiring this condition.