My gut feeling is that tinnitus is due to a neurological circuit which is compensating for an imbalance in hearing. I view the brain like a radio with components. Whereas a radio has amplifiers, tuners and rectifiers, the auditory system has the DNC, and other "olive" size structures that are wired together, eventually delivering information to the higher brain. All of this stuff is very primitive, which is why our higher conscious thoughts have little control over some of these aspects of tinnitus.
I've never accepted Jastreboff's theory about the cause of tinnitus being due to "spontaneous neurological emissions". This study of the DNC seems promising. I hope that someday we can see an electrical schematic that will explain what is going wrong with the auditory circuit that causes tinnitus.
@Karl I like your radio analogy! Tinnitus is a two-part problem, initiated by the auditory periphery but maintained by the interactions among the auditory periphery and the auditory and non-auditory cortical structures and limbic system. I've read a few articles--which I need to locate--that suggest curing tinnitus will require treatment to the peripheral auditory system as well as the brain. This, of course, is after the tinnitus precept becomes chronic. While still acute, treating the ear alone should suffice.
You're right, the DCN and its related structures are why we struggle to consciously control our tinnitus. It's also obvious the "bottom up" approach alone holds the power to cure tinnitus. The "top down" approach of TRT and CBT may--at best--succeed in surpressing the tinnitus sound from our consciousness. What does Jastreboff say about the "habitation of perception?" I know he says it follows the "habituation of reaction," but does he argue that the former means you no longer hear the tinnitus at all? And why doesn't everyone achieve a "habitation of perception?" I, for example, very rarely react to my tinnitus--but I've not achieved a "habituation of perception." Several habituated people I know, moreoever, are all able to call up their tinnitus at will. But, in general, they are not aware of their noise.
About tinnitus' auditory circuitry, I believe it will be mapped within a few years, given all the imaging studies recently conducted and currently planned. How resting states between normal and tinnitus brains differ is usually the focus of most studies. Of course, other areas of interest include the interconnectedness of tinnitus circuits (or hubs), which is a favorite of De Ridder; and some scientists are exploring changes in gray matter between normal and tinnitus subjects.
Regarding Jastreboff's "spontaneous neurological emissions" concept, it does sound nebulous. Viewing these "emissions" as an effect--rather than a cause--is more logical. Of course, Jastreboff's contributions to tinnitus theory are immeasurable. Among them, he developed the first animal model of tinnitus, noted in his profile at Emory. From this model, I'm presuming, he developed his neurophysiological model tinnitus. That model's postulate of the limbic system's role in tinnitus is still relevant today, even if the exact details remain debatable.
I need to ask a quick question on hearing aid amplifiers. Where did you locate this information? I couldn't find any online manuals with technical specifications. I don't have Widex's hearing aids; I have Starkey's and, though designed for tinnitus, I wonder if it has too few amplifiers. (I also wonder about about the different compression algorithms.) Specifically, I wonder if more amplifiers might prevent or alleviate my recruitment. Unfortunately, I can't ask my audiologist as she's no longer available, and her former office will not tell me what happened to her. I've checked online and with licensure officials but she's apparently gone. (I suspect she'll turn up somewhere eventually.)
Of course, my hearing aids could just need an adjustment. But I'm not comfortable with another audiologist from her (former) office adjusting them, given the circumstances.