Auris Medical.Phase 3 is everything. Am I wrong? Remember Auris Medical´s AM-101
Auris Medical.Phase 3 is everything. Am I wrong? Remember Auris Medical´s AM-101
The truth!What made investors dislike Otonomy?
It's sad knowing OTO-413 is the only confirmed up and coming treatment for cochlear synaptopathy.
Once again Decibel hasn't announced anything but they are working on it.
That's because there wasn't any evidence for "acute peripheral tinnitus"
Tell that to the investors that lost millions. They misrepresented data and their stock got burned. They are a laughing stock.That's because there wasn't any evidence for "acute peripheral tinnitus"
It's sad knowing OTO-413 is the only confirmed up and coming treatment for cochlear synaptopathy.
Once again Decibel hasn't announced anything but they are working on it.
You understand easily what so many struggle with.Yes. And this beautiful healthy input will lead the brainstem and cerbellum out from the states of hyperactivity and cross-activity that are causing tinnitus and hyperacusis.
Ok stop worrying about ribbon synapses. FX-322 or whatever does everything.
Will McLean of Frequency Therapeutics talks about this. Skip to 16:50:
We just have to wait.......
The stock dropped because the trial was a farce, which was why the stock dropped by 92 percent. I am sorry you were taken in by it, smart guy.The stock dropped because the clinical trials failed, smart guy.
Are you a market analyst or a researcher? Pharmaceutical companies are extremely volatile, especially the smaller ones who only have a few compounds in development. If endpoints aren't met during trials the stocks will plummet. These companies usually operate at a loss while going through trials.The stock dropped because the trial was a farce, which was why the stock dropped by 92 percent. I am sorry you were taken in by it, smart guy.
Discovery science clearly does not involve selling to market, save for milestone payments, of course they will burn through cash, don't pretend that their stock crashed because they weren't making money, it crashed because their trials were a disaster.Are you a market analyst or a researcher? Pharmaceutical companies are extremely volatile, especially the smaller ones who only have a few compounds in development. If endpoints aren't met during trials the stocks will plummet. These companies usually operate at a loss while going through trials.
What evidence do you have that the trial was a farce?
A new video to pore over:
You're welcome. I came across it and posted the link within about an hour of it being posted on YouTube so it's not surprising you didn't see it. Not the slickest public speaker in the world though.Thanks for this, I did not see it.
That's going to be true for virtually every company that has a single promising drug that fails during phase 3 of clinical trials when they have no other product lines to fall back on. Investing in pharmaceuticals is extremely speculative. If you look at the biggest gainers and losers on any given day, I can almost guarantee you are going to see some pharmaceutical / biomedical companies on the list. Hindsight is 20/20, they failed therefore the trial was a disaster and a scam. Auris could have handled the press release better, but that doesn't mean the trial was a scam, their stock would have tanked either way.Discovery science clearly does not involve selling to market, save for milestone payments, of course they will burn through cash, don't pretend that their stock crashed because they weren't making money, it crashed because their trials were a disaster.
The problems arise when investors believe the company is not being honest about the data in a timely manner, many investors that dumped this company did so because of a sequence of failures not just one single event, when companies start changing protocols and putting out press releases to try and keep shareholders on ice it leads to suspicion & fear.
We are talking about a company that was trading at highs of over 70 dollars in January 2016, and now they can barely break a dollar.
Forgive me for saying this but you clearly have some sort of affection for this company & I don't understand why.
I have stated many times, that I don't really have a "personal" dog in this race, I don't care who it is that brings success, but if we are being realistic here, I don't think it's going to be Auris Medical.
It's because these people aren't aware of each other. I just got a huge insight into this entire world.It is strange that both bimodal stimulation for tinnitus and regenerative drugs are both going to come out around the same time. Two different treatments for the same problem for the first time in history.
But it seems that bimodal stimulation is closer. Maybe.It is strange that both bimodal stimulation for tinnitus and regenerative drugs are both going to come out around the same time. Two different treatments for the same problem for the first time in history.
Forget bimodal stimulation. We absolutely want regenerative medicine. Besides FX-322 may even beat bimodal to market. Unless the NPCs foil us.But it seems that bimodal stimulation is closer. Maybe.
I think this is a good place to investigate once we confirm that treatment is working on human subjects.Will regenerated hair cells work just as good as the natural ones, yes or no, or we don't know?
Maybe. When sharks grow back their teeth it works. When lizards grow their tails back, it works. So... there's a chance.Will regenerated hair cells work just as good as the natural ones, yes or no, or we don't know?
Do birds with regenerated hair cells have natural hearing or does it come back lower quality?
Wouldn't it help if they applied the molecules to copy progenitor/supporting cells after the treatment of FX?I think this is a good place to investigate once we confirm that treatment is working on human subjects.
1. Does the treatment bring back hearing?
2. If so, what is the quality or frequency average that is recovered.
We should still investigate potential regeneration of damaged/dead cells in case this doesn't work or only works in certain circumstances.
Also, previously mentioned on a Frequency Therapeutics video was that there was a maximum capacity of hair cells that can occupy the space on the cochlea (paraphrasing). This means that additional damage after treatment of FX-322 may actually limit efficiency of future treatments.
For example, if a soldier loses hearing, gets treatment and recovers but then gets hearing damage again may have to get a different drug or treatment if no more hair cells can be created w/ FX-322.
It may give us a second chance, but we still need to find a solution for regenerating existing hair cells/nerves.
I think this is a good place to investigate once we confirm that treatment is working on human subjects.
1. Does the treatment bring back hearing?
2. If so, what is the quality or frequency average that is recovered.
We should still investigate potential regeneration of damaged/dead cells in case this doesn't work or only works in certain circumstances.
Also, previously mentioned on a Frequency Therapeutics video was that there was a maximum capacity of hair cells that can occupy the space on the cochlea (paraphrasing). This means that additional damage after treatment of FX-322 may actually limit efficiency of future treatments.
For example, if a soldier loses hearing, gets treatment and recovers but then gets hearing damage again may have to get a different drug or treatment if no more hair cells can be created w/ FX-322.
It may give us a second chance, but we still need to find a solution for regenerating existing hair cells/nerves.
They already thought of that. Go check out the Will McLean presentation. They do multiply the supporting cells.Wouldn't it help if they applied the molecules to copy progenitor/supporting cells after the treatment of FX?
If they divide the cells then change them to hair cells, they are still going to need supporting cells.
I wouldn't worry too hard about that other stuff. We should ask more questions about the dormant spiral ganglia neuritis that actually connect to the main nerve we are trying to send messages through. Someone has to send Karp a specific email about the ganglia. Synapses and hair cells wouldn't really matter without them.
The point is that there is a limit of space in the middle ear. Once it is taken up, no new cells can be generated. If all of the cells are dead and no new cells can be generated, they will have to be repaired to work.Wouldn't it help if they applied the molecules to copy progenitor/supporting cells after the treatment of FX?
If they divide the cells then change them to hair cells, they are still going to need supporting cells.
That's just one step of the process though, it's just not wise to put all eggs in one basket.I wouldn't worry too hard about that other stuff. We should ask more questions about the dormant spiral ganglia neuritis that actually connect to the main nerve we are trying to send messages through.
But don't supporting cells aid damaged cells? Even if it's damaged, wouldn't that trigger the supporting cells natural response to replace or treat the damage?The point is that there is a limit of space in the middle ear. Once it is taken up, no new cells can be generated. If all of the cells are dead and no new cells can be generated, they will have to be repaired to work.
That's just one step of the process though, it's just not wise to put all eggs in one basket.
It is how FX-322 works. It's dividing progenitor cells and differentiating them to HC.Wouldn't it help if they applied the molecules to copy progenitor/supporting cells after the treatment of FX?
If they divide the cells then change them to hair cells, they are still going to need supporting cells.
1) Hair cells are placed in the inner earThe point is that there is a limit of space in the middle ear. Once it is taken up, no new cells can be generated. If all of the cells are dead and no new cells can be generated, they will have to be repaired to work.
They do for other species, researchers have been trying to figure out how to make them do just that. But they don't kick on in mammals to regenerate hair cells. They are still looking for the magic concoction that will work, but we won't know for a long while."Following trauma or toxicity, supporting cells can eject injured hair cells from the epithelium, phagocytose hair cell debris, and in some cases, generate new hair cells"
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4005836/
1. Yeah I wrote that quickly, it is the inner ear.1) Hair cells are placed in the inner ear
2) If a hair cell doesn't work, probably it doesn't exist