Can you cite where you read this?
Pg 39 on the Frequency Therapeutics presentation.
If you look at the grap, there seems to be a steep slope from baseline to Day 15 so maybe monthly doses of FX-322 may work.
Can you cite where you read this?
I'm not following your logic here...That's why I said monthly dosing might not be spaced out enough. If they experience improvements up to Day 90, then maybe FX-322 needs to be injected every 3 months.
Oh you were referring to Phase 1. Gotcha.View attachment 44360
Pg 39 on the Frequency Therapeutics presentation.
If you look at the grap, there seems to be a steep slope from baseline to Day 15 so maybe monthly doses of FX-322 may work.
Yeah, I suspect that:Good find, blows my latest theory to shit, nice to know this kind of testing is being done though. I think I must have massive IHC damage and some OHC damage but I still can't understand how good my audiogram is up to around 12.5 kHz. It must have something to do with the EHF loss (or any dips in the standard audiogram at non-measured frequencies).
I would still love to see a non-apparent hearing loss related cohort in FX-322 trials.
I'm not following your logic here...
After @Keith Handy reminded me about how often the testing was done in Phase 1b, it made me realise that dosing FX-322 each month may be spaced out enough.Oh you were referring to Phase 1. Gotcha.
Good find. I do find it kind of funny though that they say "clear improvement trend," but then give a p-value of p=0.2111. So in other words, if the two groups were the same, there's a 21% chance of observing that level of difference or more. That's pretty high, and it's even worse because the treated group started off with less ceiling effect.View attachment 44360
Pg 39 on the Frequency Therapeutics presentation.
If you look at the grap, there seems to be a steep slope from baseline to Day 15 so maybe monthly doses of FX-322 may work.
I believe this is how my audiologist explained it to me.So, it's when there is so much distributed death of IHC, that there are next to no overlap between them that may influence tinnitus
Didn't a previous poster say that these mean nothing?INVESTIGATION ALERT: The Schall Law Firm Announces it is Investigating Claims Against Frequency Therapeutics, Inc. and Encourages Investors with Losses of $100,000 to Contact the Firm
The company is under investigation for violation of securities law. I felt crushed after hearing the recent trial results but still had some hope. Then this news. I personally won't buy any shares for the near future. Doesn't give me any confidence...
The first method takes a long time, but according to the authors, cochlear pumping is much faster. From the linked publication:Looks to me like it takes about 5 hours to reach the deep parts. You'd have to lay there for 5 hours with this thing in your ear. I would do it. Maybe they can knock you out first or they can refine the process to speed it up.
Details are in:So, they blow air into your ear to make the drug go further down the cochlea?
Ambulance Chasers. Notice that the firm is "encouraging" people to contact them (they're fishing for clients).INVESTIGATION ALERT: The Schall Law Firm Announces it is Investigating Claims Against Frequency Therapeutics, Inc. and Encourages Investors with Losses of $100,000 to Contact the Firm
The company is under investigation for violation of securities law. I felt crushed after hearing the recent trial results but still had some hope. Then this news. I personally won't buy any shares for the near future. Doesn't give me any confidence...
"This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and rules of ethics."INVESTIGATION ALERT: The Schall Law Firm Announces it is Investigating Claims Against Frequency Therapeutics, Inc. and Encourages Investors with Losses of $100,000 to Contact the Firm
The company is under investigation for violation of securities law. I felt crushed after hearing the recent trial results but still had some hope. Then this news. I personally won't buy any shares for the near future. Doesn't give me any confidence...
I'm hoping that this is just the sue everyone culture in USA. There are now two "law" firms which are putting in claims against them. I did a bit of reading and they seem to sue all biotech companies. I guess it's if you believe there was insider trading and they knew about the results and misled the public to increase the stock price before cashing out, or if you believe that the stock price crashed because of the announcements of the bad results from the trial and they didn't do anything wrong.Didn't a previous poster say that these mean nothing?
I agree. It's still too early to know how everything works with these new regeneration drugs but I think Frequency Therapeutics are honest people though. I don't think they will lie about a drug that can help with hearing loss and tinnitus. Some of the anecdotes got tinnitus improvements from FX-322.I'm hoping that this is just the sue everyone culture in USA. There are now two "law" firms which are putting in claims against them. I did a bit of reading and they seem to sue all biotech companies. I guess it's if you believe there was insider trading and they knew about the results and misled the public to increase the stock price before cashing out, or if you believe that the stock price crashed because of the announcements of the bad results from the trial and they didn't do anything wrong.
I really hope it's the latter and hope that the calibre of people at FREQ wouldn't do that.
I also hope that these are just standard things that come and go, at the end of the day FREQ have some very big and well established investors so I am sure they would be cracking down on them if they suspected wrongdoing, apparently anyone with just 1 share can make these kinds of claims of wrong doing so...
Hopefully it means nothing, hopefully the other Phase 1B trails will be a success and hopefully FX-322 will be released out in the market.
At the end of the day, I don't care how something is working or not working, but those couple of anecdotes have said that it has improved their tinnitus - if they are telling the truth. I don't know about anyone else but if I could go to the GP or ENT and they said "hey we got something that's perfectly safe for you to try, it might help or might not", I would bite their hand off to give it a go.
Come on FREQ and all these other biotechs, be honest people trying to help people and improve the world, don't turn out to be a bunch of crooks that have been manipulating data for profit.
I'm not so sure there has been zero insider trading/passing of information to friends. I'd tend to exclude it based on FREQ high-profile people but we don't know everyone in the company.Didn't a previous poster say that these mean nothing?
I don't think Frequency Therapeutics lied about FX-322. They just made an error and thought dosing every week would have been more effective. I still believe that FX-322 works and they should continue with single dosing and make sure it comes out ASAP.
And they only want $100,000+ clients so they get fatter commissions, they don't care about the little guys.Ambulance Chasers. Notice that the firm is "encouraging" people to contact them (they're fishing for clients).
Alhough I don't really care about stock talk for investment, I think things like the legal litigations being brought against Frequency Therapeutics is relevant, I mean this has an impact on the company's health and actually if there is any hint that what they have been promoting with regards to the science has been accurate.Guys, it's really important to separate stock and legal talk from actual scientific data.
I still have my eye on this drug even though it likely won't be saving me any time soon.
I don't think insider trading will be an issue. The guys at the top have been selling the stock consistently over the past years. If you look at the trades... they generally make over $500k per month in additional income. I doubt they would do a "bigger" stock sale than normal before the results were issued. Their stock sales are reported so if there was a bigger than usual sale it will be shown... but really if you are making that much additional income why risk it.Alhough I don't really care about stock talk for investment, I think things like the legal litigations being brought against Frequency Therapeutics is relevant, I mean this has an impact on the company's health and actually if there is any hint that what they have been promoting with regards to the science has been accurate.
I do hope that these claims are false, but if insider trading has been happening and if the company ethos has been just about making a quick cash grab then this changes the perception of the drug and the scientific data IMO.
Personally I think and hope that it is nothing more than a few people who got burned on the stock price coming down and who lost financially, but I really hope that these things don't risk the company and the science e.g., the company gets sued has to do a massive payout and is no longer financially viable, meaning that even if the science was good, nothing would ever come from it.
Yeah. Those fake video testimonials are sickening!If anyone should be sued, it should be Neuromod.
Pomerantz seems to be one of those fucked up law firms. If you look at this link, you can see they are "investigating" pretty much every single biotech out there...
https://www.prnewswire.com/news/pomerantz-llp/
I almost sent them an email telling them I'd rather lose my money with FREQ than sell my soul to a bunch of evil lawyers. I stopped myself, but maybe I'll do it today.Ambulance Chasers. Notice that the firm is "encouraging" people to contact them (they're fishing for clients).
Where is their proof?There are others out there fighting for the cure too. Hough Ear Institute told me things are going really well with their proof of concept and are making progress on that front.