A new player in town:
Today Decibel Therapeutics from Boston got 52 million to develops it's candiates for
Protect/Repair/Restore
The good thing, founders are top notch researchers in the field.
http://decibeltx.com/
http://decibeltx.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Decibel-Launch-PR-FINAL-for-101515.pdf
The money comes from:
http://www.thirdrockventures.com/
quote from Hough Ear Institute.
Regenerating these delicate inner ear sensory cells in the cochlea has been thought impossible by some, but in our lab, which is one of only a handful of labs working on this problem, we believe we have found a way to do it.
End quote.
I always fantasised about a quote like "we believe we have found a way to do it" or something similar.
But who knows perhaps....
Another one to check out every now an than. Which is good!
I keep reading in other articles that most likely the majority of hearing loss, T and H are because of loss of these hair cells. Especially NIHL and some medicine will kill the hair-cells.
Does this not imply that: if there are no hair-cells this NT3 is not efficacious.
I do not know what you have been reading but I suggest look at articles about ''hidden hearing loss''. It is now thought that tinnitus and hyperacusis may not come from damage to the hair cells but rather to the nerve connections in between those and the brain.
I read it at Harvard, Stanford websites, Hearing Health foundation, Action on Hearing loss etc..
Most of all it was considered sensational news that birds, chickens and fish where able to regrow lost hair-cells and for this reason where able to restore NIHL.
I see a lot of images where hair cells are destroyed because of NIHL. Also there is still a lot of talk about restoring hearing (and T and H) by regenerating hair cells in the cochlea.
Could these ribbon synapses mentioned in the article be "easier" to repair though. Easier than regenerating hair-cells? I kinda hope that the hair cells in my cochleas are still intact. But this is based on a feeling because there is no why to know which will be the worse option in future "regeneration".
But I will read the articles you mentioned too. I am keen to learn/understand about this subject
Also if AM-101 is targeting this damage does this imply that AM-101 could improve NIHL?
I think both restoring hair cells and transplanting neurons into inner ears will both cure hearing loss. Hair cells for hearing frequency loss and neurons for tinnitus and hyperacusis to restore the connection lost from damage.
Thanks.
I too did read that both hair cells and neurons could be damaged/dead. Than I understand why hair cell regeneration is still important in the principle of repairing after NIHL.
What type of treatment do you think should be made to try and fix the damaged auditory nerve?This is true. In fact, it's possible damage the connection between the hair cell and the auditory nerve while the hair cell remains in tact. You can damage the hair cell or the connection or both.
What type of treatment do you think should be made to try and fix the damaged auditory nerve?
I don't know. Promote neurite outgrowth maybe. This is far from my expertise, I've just been doing reading and self research since my T started.
beside the term " decades away" it sounds very promising