On the funding question, I've donated to Tinnitus Talk over the years and been happy to do so because I always felt
@Markku &
@Hazel were out there fighting our corner. Since learning a bit more about the history of direct electrical stimulation of the cochlear, however,
a treatment that was shown over 40 years ago to mitigate tinnitus, I have to be honest and say I'm finding myself a bit on the fence at the moment with this funding of research question.
I mean, why do researchers need more money today to prove something that was shown to work over 40 years ago? Science is supposed to translate into something useful, not just go around in circles for decades. More to the point, though, Dr. Hamid Djalilian, who will shortly take questions on behalf of Tinnitus Quest, is engaged in exactly this kind of "exploratory" research,
that again was shown to work over 40 years ago.
This has started to make me feel extremely uneasy. What is going on? Are the people researching this solution today simply unaware of the original research? (I find that hard to believe, by the way, because academics are forever citing each other.) Or is something about the original research didn't translate into a usable treatment? (I've seen nothing to support this, but I am open to correction.)
I can't participate in live Q&As, but I think it important Dr. Djalilian is questioned about these points because they are absolutely relevant to his work and, of course, ongoing funding streams.