I would expect that. I would also expect that as the product has ramped up that odds are you will genuinely have some lucky responders. This anecdotal evidence would not be enough to build confidence in anybody's individual odds, though.
Yeah, count me as
one hundred percent skeptical on this until I see actual peer reviewed data that passes bluster to clear the FDA hurdles, and even then I will be poring over their data, reading all the conflict of interest disclosures, and also looking at their CIs, actual objective decibel changes in tinnitus, etc.
UMich did all that, using normal research dollars, and they have published all of it, in tabular form and as raw data. Lenire, to the best of my knowledge, did all their own research using venture capitalist money, have only published
their own aggregations of their data sets in graphical form. Also, they have very notably
hired a US COO, CFO and Director Of Sales,
despite not having FDA approval yet.
Who knows what the outcome of either device is, should both hit mass market, but the path Lenire is following is just some tech bro bullshit, and that is coming from a tech bro who has worked in the VC-backed world for much longer than I intended to.
I don't think we'll have "lucky" responders, though. Either the device (either of them) is at least somewhat effective such that objective tinnitus measurement along with self-rated noise and distress is meaningfully reduced for some users in a way which is easily differentiable from placebo, and the device works -- or, the rate at which people report "improvement" is identical to the placebo groups, in which case, the device is an expensive potato.
In the case of UMich they have published fairly equivocal data showing that real treatment is substantially effective on a significant number of people with somatically modulatable tinnitus, and also that some people did not respond at all. Again, as far as I know, Lenire has really only published very very pretty colored graphs and charts which they say reflect the research they did. That doesn't inspire a lot of confidence from me, nor do the trip reports from people on here who have used Lenire.
It's a much smaller group of us (I think only 3?) who have used the US research-based bimodal devices, but I believe we all responded pretty strongly? In my case there's really no question I responded, the hard data showing an objective volume decrease in my tinnitus during treatment as measured by a double blind RCT, has been published. I have it as a PDF on my hard drive! (I also know what my patient code was, so I can unblind myself now
Here we go again. Tinnitus Talk's conclusions were, IMHO, misleadingly positive. I know Tinnitus Talk vehemently denies this but your comment is why it very much is.
I 100% agree with you. The results shown
at best were not nearly as good as what UMich's peer reviewed data shows, even if they were completely accurate and reflected an RCT, which they don't. (UMich had an average reduction of around 50% in objectively matched tinnitus volume, 6-10 dB).