MuteButton

Status
Not open for further replies.
That's not true. Tinnitus frequency has nothing to do with MuteButton. It is calibrated to your hearing profile, not tinnitus profile.
Didn't @Clare B say that they tried to match her tinnitus volume? That's not part of the calibration? I think I remember her mentioning this in a post somewhere on this thread that she found it hard to get it right? Am I wrong? I'm reffering to tinnitus frequency.
 
Didn't @Clare B say that they tried to match her tinnitus volume? That's not part of the calibration? I think I remember her mentioning this in a post somewhere on this thread that she found it hard to get it right? Am I wrong? I'm reffering to tinnitus frequency.
Watch the video of the interview with Neuromod. They stated that tinnitus matching is not part of the device setup. This may have been done during the trial, but the finished product does not require it. The device is calibrated to the results of an audiogram. I would assume the only stipulation is that your hearing is good enough to hear the therapy tones.
 
The effect of the device is very self limiting and wears off after a few days of not using it.
That may be true if you discover very early on that the tinnitus is getting worse and immediately stop, however those who were helped during the course of Neuromod's full 12-month treatment regimen claim the effect has been "permanent" (at least to date). That's still an open question, how long-term the effect will be, but it sure sounds like if you do it for the full 12 weeks it won't wear off in a few days.
 
Watch the video of the interview with Neuromod. They stated that tinnitus matching is not part of the device setup. This may have been done during the trial, but the finished product does not require it. The device is calibrated to the results of an audiogram. I would assume the only stipulation is that your hearing is good enough to hear the therapy tones.
And why would they look for the tinnitus frequency during the trial when it doesn't matter with the finished product? Doesn't make sense to me.
 
I have asymmetric hearing above 15 kHz. One of my tinnitus tones is extremely high pitched, probably well above 16 kHz. I can hear 16 kHz quite easily on the left ear, and can hear up to 18 kHz or so on the left ear at normal volumes. I have to raise the volume to hear 16 kHz more clearly on the right ear, and I seem to be out at 16.5-17 kHz on the right ear, even at a fairly high volume on my phone frequency generator.

I have read that bimodal stimulation will not work for you if you can't hear your tinnitus frequency.

I'm really worried that MuteButton may not work for me, because I can barely hear my tinnitus frequency out of one ear, if at all. I really don't want to end up with 16-17 kHz+ tinnitus for the rest of my life. :(
Can you explain what you mean it won't work if you can't hear your tinnitus frequency?? What do you mean?? Can't we all hear our tinnitus...?
 
Can you explain what you mean it won't work if you can't hear your tinnitus frequency?? What do you mean?? Can't we all hear our tinnitus...?
Some people have a difficult time matching their tinnitus frequency, regardless this doesn't matter as the treatment is not tailored to the frequency but your audiogram so you receive all the necessary acoustic stimuli.
 
Some people have a difficult time matching their tinnitus frequency, regardless this doesn't matter as the treatment is not tailored to the frequency but your audiogram so you receive all the necessary acoustic stimuli.
What I meant was that I can't physically hear a 17 kHz tone out of my right ear, but I can out of my left ear. I am worried that MuteButton won't work if you physically can't hear your tinnitus tone.
 
What I meant was that I can't physically hear a 17 kHz tone out of my right ear, but I can out of my left ear. I am worried that MuteButton won't work if you physically can't hear your tinnitus tone.
No point jumping to conclusion whether this will help or not, at this point nobody knows if it's the real deal or another false treatment.
 
And why would they look for the tinnitus frequency during the trial when it doesn't matter with the finished product? Doesn't make sense to me.
Because it's a trial. They probably figured out that matching and using individual frequencies didn't matter. If you can eliminate the challenge of frequency matching and not affect the results then that's a good move. It's easier if less customization is necessary. Even though this device will be available soon it is still a work in progress. I expect the parameters of treatment to change further in the future as they get even more data.
 
And why would they look for the tinnitus frequency during the trial when it doesn't matter with the finished product? Doesn't make sense to me.
If I remember correctly @Claire B was part of the first trial. They very well may have frequency matched the participants in that trial. It would be interesting to see if they frequency matched the participants of the second trial. I doubt they did.
 
Can you say for definite the University of Michigan device helped your tinnitus? How much volume decrease did you get? Say before treatment 7/10 and after treatment what did it decrease to?
No, I can't, because I am a severely biased person who was a direct participant. The whole reason that randomized controlled trials exist and are necessary is that we're all bad witnesses of our own subjective life experience.

I think it helped. I might even say I believe that it did. Thinking and beliefs are not definite subjective fact, so, we gotta wait for the larger studies to complete.

Do you think this Neuromod device will last beyond the therapy period if they've tweaked their device?
I have absolutely no idea. Maybe it will, maybe it won't, maybe it will give you superpowers, maybe it will give you a whole new kind of cancer that's never been discovered before. Need moar data with large-sample longitudinal followup.
 
If it got worse this already shows bimodal neuromodulation being able to modulate tinnitus; what can be turned up can be turned down. There was someone here who did a DIY bimodal and theirs increased; which isn't a bad thing because you're modulating the tinnitus.

It's all about parameters and then finding the optimum 'dosage' to get to achieve the greatest level of efficacy. They're working on that.

Yeah I agree, it's scary
Yeah but we seem to have it the worst.
I thought yours was gone?
 
When I get my hands on this device in the coming weeks, I'm going to keep using it past the recommended time of treatment of 10 weeks, Susan Shore said continued use of bimodal stimulation would most likely result in exponentially increased resetting of neuroplasticity resulting in greater and longer effect.
 
There's one thing that's getting me confused.
Let's say I haven't got hearing loss but my tinnitus frequency is above 8 kHz (I'd say mine is between 11 - 12 kHz), does this mean i'm not eligible for treatment? I know you answered me but not sure if I understood completely.
Nobody really knows who will or won't be deemed eligible for treatment once this gets into wider release. It's still in a testing phase.
 
Nobody really knows who will or won't be deemed eligible for treatment once this gets into wider release. It's still in a testing phase.
Some people in this thread state that the tinnitus frequency is not a problem. Claire, as she claims, was part of the first tests and that was one of the parameters they were looking for. Now it seems that's not needed and they only adjust the MuteButton to your hearing. Doesn't sound right...
 
Nobody really knows who will or won't be deemed eligible for treatment once this gets into wider release. It's still in a testing phase.
WTF? Are you talking about the Neuromod device?

I thought it was being released soon but you're saying it's still being tested?

I'm confused. WTF is going on with this thing?
 
WTF? Are you talking about the Neuromod device?

I thought it was being released soon but you're saying it's still being tested?

I'm confused. WTF is going on with this thing?
It is being released soon.

Also, they are in phase 3 testing and determining which parameters are best for sub group efficacy. They still have a pile of data left to analyse.

So far, high frequency desynchronization appears to be more efficacious that low frequency desynchronization. Also, those with comorbid hyperacusis have a 90% response rate and respond twice as much better than those of with only tinnitus. But a lot of those with tinnitus were deemed responders, not super responders.

It's all very new, so they are always determining what will work best for certain sub groups of tinnitus patients. Hope that clears things up.
 
It is being released soon.

Also, they are in phase 3 testing and determining which parameters are best for sub group efficacy. They still have a pile of data left to analyse.

So far, high frequency desynchronization appears to be more efficacious that low frequency desynchronization. Also, those with comorbid hyperacusis have a 90% response rate and respond twice as much better than those of with only tinnitus. But a lot of those with tinnitus were deemed responders, not super responders.

It's all very new, so they are always determining what will work best for certain sub groups of tinnitus patients. Hope that clears things up.
Do you know approx when? What do you mean by high frequency desynchronisation?
 
Do you know approx when? What do you mean by high frequency desynchronisation?
Nobody knows, not even them. They just say "soon"

The tones you hear on the device would be high frequency tones as compared to low frequency tones by the sounds of it. It helped as the higher frequency tones led to sustained improvement by the sounds of it.
 
WTF? Are you talking about the Neuromod device?

I thought it was being released soon but you're saying it's still being tested?

I'm confused. WTF is going on with this thing?
Hi Allan - have a read over the thread, I and others have done some posts on this.

Devices can be released onto the market when still in the testing phase under current EU device regulations.
 
Some people in this thread state that the tinnitus frequency is not a problem. Claire, as she claims, was part of the first tests and that was one of the parameters they were looking for. Now it seems that's not needed and they only adjust the MuteButton to your hearing. Doesn't sound right...
Watch the Q&A video with Neuromod. They go over this in detail. They set the device up to the measurements of your audiogram. Whether or not you think that is the right way to go about it is immaterial. They are testing the device in these trials and this is the solution they are using.

From the video: "It's tuned to their hearing profile, not necessarily their tinnitus."
 
Really wish they would give an update when it's being released. Checking everyday and everyday no new news. I really want Neuromod to work on the majority of those who use it.
 
Excellent question. I don't know.
You would think up to 16 kHz. Reason being is that they tailor the device to your audiogram. If you have some hearing loss over 8 kHz then the purpose of it being tailored is that all the frequency ranges in your cochlear achieve the same levels of stimulation. That's just my theory though.

A rough guess here but it could be the non responders were those who have lost all the hearing at a particular frequency thus not being able to receive the stimulation required to achieve neuroplasticity.

Take with a grain of salt though, I'm a layman guessing.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Log in or register to get the full forum benefits!

Register

Register on Tinnitus Talk for free!

Register Now