Yet again this thread derails onto something completely different.
FYI, Craig Gill, drummer for the band Inspiral Carpets killed himself at 44 years old (I think) due to debilitating tinnitus. If only he knew about Neuromod, these guys need to be careful, tinnitus can be an irritant that somebody learns to live with along to something that somebody kills themselves for. Not that this is helpful, we're all here to support each other and keep up to date with the latest evidence based treatments.
Does anyone know the difference between the old MuteButton and the new MuteButton? Both have the headphones and the electrodes on the tongue, so what has changed?
Thanks.
From what I can understand off it - nothing. The product is exactly the same HOWEVER they are testing different methods to different sub-types of tinnitus. From the Q&A they implied:
- High frequency desynchronization is more effective than low frequency desynchronization, especially towards the end. From how I understand that, the effects of tinnitus suppression or a quieter tinnitus are more effective after treatment has stopped with the higher frequency delivered through the headphones. With the lower frequency tones the effects don't last as long.
- It is more efficacious for those with tinnitus AND hyperacusis (90%) and that sub-group is achieving almost twice as much improvement as those with just tinnitus (super responders).
@hans799, you are optimistic thinking we'll get any more answers for Tinnitus Week, they seem to have been in the stage of wrapping up their latest TENT-A2 results/still gathering info and presenting their data from TENT-A1 at high profile science conferences.
I am thinking their main priority at this point is not engaging with potential customers but rather convincing the scientific community they're onto something; there has in the past been lots of hype leading to constant let downs.
Maybe this time they are right, who knows.