Member- Jul 21, 2013
- 842
- Tinnitus Since
- 01/2013
- Cause of Tinnitus
- Acoustic trauma from headphones
Captioned images are one of the oldest and most common types of internet memes tbh fam
My Posting Place
- Thread starter threefirefour
- Start date
- Jul 21, 2013
- 842
- Tinnitus Since
- 01/2013
- Cause of Tinnitus
- Acoustic trauma from headphones
Project Chanology attracted all the disgusting filthy neckbeards to 4chan and their normie bros soon followed. Before then it was pure meme power.
not these guys, I know for a fact they lurk MPP because they quoted an EXACT post of mine and mentioned tinnitustalk.
Mr Worried
Member
- Sep 9, 2017
- 199
- Tinnitus Since
- august 2017-july 2018
- Cause of Tinnitus
- Ripped the tag off a mattress
Why's the housing market so crazy in Cali?
I've heard a lot of people mention it over the past 6 months
The house market has always been really crazy. It's because our population is growing and California is just a good location.
I believe Auris Medical is right to an extent and their drug canidate will help acute tinnitus, NMDA does cause neurological changes in the brain and kill more hair cells. so blocking it obviously helps. But the whole audiotory nerve hyperexcitability peripheral model of tinnitus doesn't make any sense from what all the other research is saying and they don't explain why or how they know this?
I want Auris Medical and Otonomy to explain their fringe hypothesis that goes against all the other models and why I we should take them over everyone else that is already showing evidence of the opposite.
I want Auris Medical and Otonomy to explain their fringe hypothesis that goes against all the other models and why I we should take them over everyone else that is already showing evidence of the opposite.
Last edited:
Oh yeah I already know doctors, therapist and especially ENT's advise people with tinnitus and hearing problems to stay off the Internet about Googling there conditions. (especially because of people like me) The ATA would literally refer to me as an amateur posing as an expert. (which I never claimed and openly say I'm not) but let's move along so the point being doctors tell patients not to browse the internet about tinnitus, I get that your average simpleton loves homeopathy, religious dogma, Organic/Natural garbage, motivational conmen and other things that should be rightfully criticized. But how does that relate to actual scientist that talk about the biology of the inner ear, brain, and novel cutting edge science like signal timing, epilepsy drugs, GABA increasement, NMDA blockage, neutrophins to repair ribbon synapses, cochlear hair cell regeneration to reduce or prevent tinnitus? That's totally different using the internet to find factual information as opposed to being in the dark.
When I first got tinnitus I was confused why people were saying bent hair cells, others were saying phantom hair cells,others were saying specific audiotory nerve damage, others were saying the central gain model for any form of hearing loss. There was so much crap floating around and no direct answer. I wanted to an explanation and I knew the no one knows crap didn't add up with what I was hearing from some sources.
When I first got tinnitus I was confused why people were saying bent hair cells, others were saying phantom hair cells,others were saying specific audiotory nerve damage, others were saying the central gain model for any form of hearing loss. There was so much crap floating around and no direct answer. I wanted to an explanation and I knew the no one knows crap didn't add up with what I was hearing from some sources.
specialist throw in the disproven bent hair cell hypothesis (which this dude called a theory) with a little bit of TRT to add insult to injury.
Log in or register to get the full forum benefits!
Similar threads
