My Posting Place

Perfect description for tinnitus,
Magnum Chaos
Resized_15406773260711221630570575555801_73941048061582006.jpeg
 
Sorry not interested before they announce the results of their first trial.

Blind faith is dangerous. People who believe in God even more dangerous.
The Communists were totally atheistic and killed 100,000,000 people in the 20th century. So who is dangerous?

Also this is a support forum for people with diseases and you've now purposefully insulted many of us. Look how old you are, dont you know how to behave?
 
What?¿ when was....what was...how was... who?
20 million orthodox Christians in Russia
https://www.quora.com/How-many-people-were-martyred-by-the-USSR-for-being-Christian

10 million Ukrainians starved by the Soviets in the holodomer
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holodomor

Chinese communist policies starved 55 million
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Leap_Forward

That's 85 million and I'm tired of looking at this.

This is a support community for tinnitus sufferers not a political debate platform.

There are Muslims, Jews, Protestants, Catholics, Hindus, Atheists, Straights, Gays, whatever man. We all need refrain from the religious and political insults please. Wtff? Tinnitus doesnt give a rats ass what you believe in.
 
Ed209, the bigger picture. They already know about the efficacy, they are doing this trial because of the FDA approval, as we know it's a process to follow.

Where are the trials with this data? They are still safety testing it as far as I can see. You can't go by the results that came from the mice studies if that's what you're suggesting?

You all need to chill. You can't start a movement for a drug that has no data on its efficacy to silence tinnitus. Nobody will listen to you and they will think you are all crazy.

If there was data suggesting it will work on tinnitus I would understand. The fact of the matter is that we don't currently know what effect this will have on a person. You might be attempting to green light a potentially dangerous, or useless, drug. Wait and see what phase IIa produces first, at least.
 
If you don't believe in God, or if considered yourself an atheist, it's your own choice of living. God still loves you. God is real.

Prove it then?....i'll bet you can't.

Even if a god existed I sure wouldnt want him to love me, cause I would hate him.
 
Prove it then?....i'll bet you can't.

Even if a god existed I sure wouldnt want him to love me, cause I would hate him.
Woah, chill dude. That's super serious to talk about and confront. I know you're frustrated but don't fuck around and cross a line. I'm not saying it cause I'm a Christian. If you personally feel that way, do it privately or in a less aggressive manner. Everyone on this forum wants the exact same thing and we all have different ways of coping.

He said that shit hours ago too. If you have a problem with someone having faith in their religion and exercising it in a positive manner...then maybe you're the asshole. Doesn't matter if you believe or not.

Read the bottom of John's post.
 
Woah, chill dude. That's super serious to talk about and confront. I know you're frustrated but don't fuck around and cross a line. I'm not saying it cause I'm a Christian. If you personally feel that way, do it privately or in a less aggressive manner. Everyone on this forum wants the exact same thing and we all have different ways of coping.

First of all, I am not a dude.

Second of all....you sem to be the one in need of calming down. I only asked 1000 a serious quastion and my point is that he can't make a statement of God being real cause neither he can prove that, just as I can't prove that he does not. I respect all people's belief, but don't make a statement that "god is real and loves you" cause that is disrespectful to us who are atheists. That's being pushy with your religion and I don't care for that.

If one were to simply say they believe in god and that they gather strengh from that instead, then I fully respect that.
 
First of all, I am not a dude.

Second of all....you sem to be the one in need of calming down. I only asked 1000 a serious quastion and my point is that he can't make a statement of God being real cause neither he can prove that, just as I can't prove that he does not. I respect all people's belief, but don't make a statement that "god is real and lovee you" cause that is disrespectful to us who are atheists. That's being pushy with ypur religion and I don't care for that.
Dude is a unisex term. I fail to see the part where it's ok to flat out say you hate someone's God. Even if you want them to back it up or you feel like it's forced. Do you take offense when people say that they will pray for you?
 
Dude is a unisex term. I fail to see the part where it's ok to flat out say you hate someone's God. Even if you want them to back it up or you feel like it's forced. Do you take offense when people say that they will pray for you?

Yes I kinda do, seeing as I am not a believer. I would kindly reject people's prayers for me. if a person want to help me......donate a little some to actual tinnitus research.

Nobody should take offence that I would hate God if he existed. To each there own. Just because you are Christian does not mean that everybody has to love this god.
 
Yes, in a way I do seeing as I am not a believer.

Nobody should take offence that I would hate God if he existed. To each there own. Just because you are Christian does not mean that everybody has to love this god.
I'm not saying that either. It just seems insensitive. I always thought praying for others was like an extension of hoping or wishing something good would happen for someone. It's sweet to think someone would actively sit down and take time out of their schedule to seriously think about your plights and pray to whoever they think will help. Most people just say "I hope things work out" and they'll move on with their day.
 
Have you even read my posts?
They are giving the actual drug. Do you honestly believe that just because the official endpoint of the trial is safety that the subjects wont report IF IT WORKS?

They are going to know if it works by the end of this trial. Think about it. And if it is safe, which the first trial already showed, and they seemed to suggest that to @Deathtotinni down at the clinic.

My idea is that, if it is safe, and IF IF IF IF IF IF it works, which they will definitely know by the end of this trial then they should be allowed to hurry up and expedite the release of this drug. There is no good reason whatsoever why it should take years like you say.

I have clearly defined what we need to do so if you're still unsure the here.

1. They will know if it is safe and if it works by the end of December
2. We need a rep from the ATA to reach out to FrequencyTX to find this out
3. We need to then turn to the FDA to ask them to cut the red tape and approve it ASAP.

And your assertion that it probably wont work is based off what? The failed keyzilen trial? This drug is absolutely nothing like keyzilen, and this technology works in living mice, so you're wrong, it has a better chance of succeeding than failing.
Because it's a new type of drug and no other treatment like it exist, the FDA will expedite the drug and have it approved in 30 days I believe. This is likely because of possibly something that's been implicated because of possible epidemics. I've read this drug and drugs like it are being pushed by the goverment/dod to come out as soon as possible.
 
Because it's a new type of drug and no other treatment like it exist, the FDA will expedite the drug and have it approved in 30 days I believe. This is likely because of possibly something that's been implicated because of possible epidemics. I've read this drug and drugs like it are being pushed by the goverment/dod to come out as soon as possible.
That's an explosive level of optimism!!! I hope you're right bro.
 
Nobody should take offence that I would hate God if he existed.

I for one fully understand why you would feel this way. This world is full of ridiculous chaos and suffering and it may seem to many that if God were real, that He did not do a good job creating this world.

This is the basis of Hinduism, that Brahma, their god of creation, really screwed up badly and that the world is in fact all bad.

This is also the basis for Gnosticism, that a malformed demon made the entire material universe, and it is bad.

And even if you read 1st and 2nd Kings in the Bible, you'll see things like where God brought punishment on Israel by allowing the Assyrians to totally destroy them and during the siege of Samaria there was a famine and women were swindling each other into eating their babies.

But theres a coming reconcilliation for all of these things and it will be so good that we will totally understand why these things happened, and it certainly is not God's fault but man's. God only warned us and we havent heeded these warnings and this isnt Karma, punishments and rewards are not distributed on an individual basis, in this world.

About proof: the early church knew that people need proof of this.

"For with what reason should we believe of a crucified man that He is the first-born of the unbegotten God, and Himself will pass judgment on the whole human race, unless we had found testimonies concerning Him published before He came and was born as man, and unless we saw that things had happened accordingly"
- Justin Martyr, First Apology ch 53.

Proof comes from something called prophecy. I can show that there are impossible predictions concerning the rise and fall of all major world empires that include little finite details.

Sir Isaac Newton wrote a whole book about it called Daniel and the Apocalypse.

He knew from his studies, just as I, that there is more than sufficient evidence that the Bible is totally true.

One example, the early church fathers knew and wrote in the second century, that Rome would fall and split into 10 nations from their correct interpretation of the Book of Daniel. And this thing didn't happen until the 5th century.

Isaac Newton does an amazing job explaining this in his book.

The end of the story though is beginning of a glorious perfect existence for all eternity, a reconcilliation of all things.
 
early MPP was actually hilarious, we would photoshop pictures of jastreboff like @IAmCalifornia does.

threefirefour and i would meet in an IRC outside of tinnitustalk and discuss how to troll threads with scripted arguments. i would use macro recordings to autopost in threads and auto like post.

extremely nsfw innuendos were in MPP all the time.

now this thread is larger then ever but it's autism levels decreased.

but yeah we almost got banned and rightfully so for how we behaved from january-april 2018
 
I just want to die, curing hearing loss relating to speech in background noise is too complicated.

The tonal audiogram says i have perfect hearing.
also the tonal audiogram 250-8khz is the final authority as if one qualifies for the drug even if it is on market.

They don't know if treating the hearing loss will help noxacusis/hyperacusis, tinnitus, and tensor typani spasms.
because most hearing loss has to do with synaptic ribbon damage, regenerating hair cells may be useless for speech in background noise.

I have my own hypothesis that regenerating hair cells associated with damaged audiotory nerve fibers might just make noxacusis/hyperacusis worse. ( I HOPE IM WRONG)

I have no family, friends that would help me afford a treatment or treatments. Several fixes may be needed for my so called "clinically unconcerning hearing loss".

Different bio-companeis are making different claims that contradict one another
i'm so confused.
 
Last edited:
An actual cure for hearing damage would come down to several fixes repairng hair cells, ribbon synapse, several types of audiotory nerve fibers, and probably a way to reprogram the dorsal cochlear nucleus.
even in mild hearing loss.

it's not gonna happen, even if one treatment becomes available I won't be able to afford it.
my hearing loss is clinically unconcerning.

i want to die
 
An actual cure for hearing damage would come down to several fixes repairng hair cells, ribbon synapse, several types of audiotory nerve fibers, and probably a way to reprogram the dorsal cochlear nucleus.
even in mild hearing loss.

it's not gonna happen, even if one treatment becomes available I won't be able to afford it.
my hearing loss is clinically unconcerning.

i want to die

Doesn't frequency therapeutics drugs repair hair cells along with ribbon damage? I'm pretty sure I read @JohnAdams discussing this.

Also the stimulation devices will most likely provide a much needed treatment until the cure it found. I know a cure is optimal, but a least a treatment is better than nothing. I am sure it will give a lot of us some quality of life back.
 
Does anyone else notice how many people view this forum at once? The front page says 736 people are here. Is this normal?
 

Log in or register to get the full forum benefits!

Register

Register on Tinnitus Talk for free!

Register Now