MemberWe don't know why gravity coincidentally changes at a giga scale and why it still works a pseudo neural network!
You also seen the bigger picture (the galatic web) and disregarded it's significance.
My Posting Place
- Thread starter threefirefour
- Start date
We don't know why gravity coincidentally changes at a giga scale and why it still works a pseudo neural network!
You also seen the bigger picture (the galatic web) and disregarded it's significance.
MOND is already showing some evidence that gravity changes at a galaxy size scale. But why does it concidentially form a pseudo neural network? How do you know the system isn't working like efferent and afferent neural signals?
JulianBrumbelow
Member
- Apr 5, 2018
- 219
- Tinnitus Since
- 03/14/2017
- Cause of Tinnitus
- loud headphones audio work
JulianBrumbelow
Member
- Apr 5, 2018
- 219
- Tinnitus Since
- 03/14/2017
- Cause of Tinnitus
- loud headphones audio work
A year ago we were learning about the research on fusiform cells, central gain and cochlear neuropathy. Now we are learning about panpsychism, consciousness, quantum physics and psi/controversial phenomena surrounding the nature of reality.
JulianBrumbelow
Member
- Apr 5, 2018
- 219
- Tinnitus Since
- 03/14/2017
- Cause of Tinnitus
- loud headphones audio work
FUCK GOTTA RANT! So apparently pain management isn't taking new patients cause of the fucking coronavirus. This stupid fucking disease is gonna be the end of the economy I swear to god. I fucking hate people.
https://www.sheldrake.org/research/animal-powers
I'm trying to get the message out. Materalism has major flaws and nature shows it. There is possible psi phenomena in the natural world. How a spider knows to spin a web, how a Gophers know to dig a hole. How a beaver knows how to build a dam, how certain birds knows to use tools or migrate. How insects know to build colonies. How baby elephants find ancient watering holes their ancestors used. How fish, birds, turtles know how to migrate great distance and return to exact spots. How animals evolved bright colors in the first place to attract mates/scare predators. Materalist Science knows animals sense Earth quakes or know when their owners are coming home but has to assume dumb things like "heightened senses" or genetic memory .
There are TONS OF PHENOMENA in nature that suggest non-human animals have senses related to quantum physics such as sensing the Earths magnetic poles (which materalist believe) or a network of consciousness (which they don't). Even identical twins in humans report psi phenomena, such as feeling emotions from one another at long distances. Or how humans are getting smarter and smarter despite having brains the exact same brains as cave men. Look how butterflies travel, from Mexico to Michigan, thousands of miles over great distances and return to the EXACT LOCATION their ancestors were born. A naturalistic form of reincarnation may be used to explain this phenomena. Or at least a network of collective unconsciousness.
Materialist have to assume DNA and Genetic memory and heightened senses are responsible for all of this. They have a weak argument and they are biased as fuck acting like it's all explainable when it's not. Wildlife shows fuckery all the time that suggest psi/consciousness centrism really exist. There is so little science knows but they've made an assumption that biology cannot succeed the known laws of physics Materialist sciences arose from 19th-20th century physics. They made the assumption that Universe behaves more like a machine then an organism. During the time cells were assumed to be blobs of jello and physics was billard ball and deterministic. Fucking normies like Einstein held back science hundreds of years.
When are materalist going to show the exact genes that tell a spider to spin a web, or a turtle to migrate and recreate them in a robot/software to debunk the collective consciousness network/morphic resonance hypothesis. How does all this pseudo-purpose in nature happen by chance?
Materialism has weak arguments to explain behavior of wild life. Adding consciousness (panpsychism) as fundamental part of reality gives better answers a bunch of hard questions. If you want to go down the materalist rabbit hole you are living in a dumb Universe, with 99.999% odds saying you should not exist because the particles that make up your brain neurons could have ended up on the surface of Jupiter or anywhere in the Universe but you. You have no free will because biochemical puppets are are within a matrix of 4th dimensional space-time and consciousness is a just a random arrangement of matter with no purpose despite the illusion of free will.
Do you really believe that?
I'm trying to get the message out. Materalism has major flaws and nature shows it. There is possible psi phenomena in the natural world. How a spider knows to spin a web, how a Gophers know to dig a hole. How a beaver knows how to build a dam, how certain birds knows to use tools or migrate. How insects know to build colonies. How baby elephants find ancient watering holes their ancestors used. How fish, birds, turtles know how to migrate great distance and return to exact spots. How animals evolved bright colors in the first place to attract mates/scare predators. Materalist Science knows animals sense Earth quakes or know when their owners are coming home but has to assume dumb things like "heightened senses" or genetic memory .
There are TONS OF PHENOMENA in nature that suggest non-human animals have senses related to quantum physics such as sensing the Earths magnetic poles (which materalist believe) or a network of consciousness (which they don't). Even identical twins in humans report psi phenomena, such as feeling emotions from one another at long distances. Or how humans are getting smarter and smarter despite having brains the exact same brains as cave men. Look how butterflies travel, from Mexico to Michigan, thousands of miles over great distances and return to the EXACT LOCATION their ancestors were born. A naturalistic form of reincarnation may be used to explain this phenomena. Or at least a network of collective unconsciousness.
Materialist have to assume DNA and Genetic memory and heightened senses are responsible for all of this. They have a weak argument and they are biased as fuck acting like it's all explainable when it's not. Wildlife shows fuckery all the time that suggest psi/consciousness centrism really exist. There is so little science knows but they've made an assumption that biology cannot succeed the known laws of physics Materialist sciences arose from 19th-20th century physics. They made the assumption that Universe behaves more like a machine then an organism. During the time cells were assumed to be blobs of jello and physics was billard ball and deterministic. Fucking normies like Einstein held back science hundreds of years.
When are materalist going to show the exact genes that tell a spider to spin a web, or a turtle to migrate and recreate them in a robot/software to debunk the collective consciousness network/morphic resonance hypothesis. How does all this pseudo-purpose in nature happen by chance?
Materialism has weak arguments to explain behavior of wild life. Adding consciousness (panpsychism) as fundamental part of reality gives better answers a bunch of hard questions. If you want to go down the materalist rabbit hole you are living in a dumb Universe, with 99.999% odds saying you should not exist because the particles that make up your brain neurons could have ended up on the surface of Jupiter or anywhere in the Universe but you. You have no free will because biochemical puppets are are within a matrix of 4th dimensional space-time and consciousness is a just a random arrangement of matter with no purpose despite the illusion of free will.
Do you really believe that?
I've honestly had enough of this BS.
What is management? Why are you paying someone to teach you to manage your suffering.
I don't want anyone to tell me how to suffer. I can choose to end my suffering if I want.
Pain management is to help with the physical symptoms of pain. Stuff like nerve blocks or pain drugs. Not CBT or stuff like that, I'm fully committed to killing myself if nothing helps my pain problem.
JulianBrumbelow
Member
- Apr 5, 2018
- 219
- Tinnitus Since
- 03/14/2017
- Cause of Tinnitus
- loud headphones audio work
- Aug 5, 2019
- 1,852
- Tinnitus Since
- 05/2019
- Cause of Tinnitus
- Autoimmune hyperacusis from Sjogren's Syndrome
The question of "why do I experience my life movie and not someone else?" is different from "can I actively use my free will to change my movie?"
I believe my personality and choices are only my biology. But why am I me? Will I get to see another movie in my next life? Will I get reincarnated as some other energy? I am not dogmatic about those kinds of spiritual questions. I am open-minded to reincarnation, but I think it's random. Obviously, if I thought it wasn't random, then I would have to believe that I had the free will to impact it.
One more point. I think the reason materialists are comfortable with the unknowns is because we have historical documentation of us learning things that we used to think were unworldly until we discovered them. The first humans didn't even know they had brains. It used to be novel to think the Earth was round. I think most materialists run under the assumption that with infinite resources, a planet that was infinitely sustainable, scientific questions would keep getting answered.
I believe my personality and choices are only my biology. But why am I me? Will I get to see another movie in my next life? Will I get reincarnated as some other energy? I am not dogmatic about those kinds of spiritual questions. I am open-minded to reincarnation, but I think it's random. Obviously, if I thought it wasn't random, then I would have to believe that I had the free will to impact it.
One more point. I think the reason materialists are comfortable with the unknowns is because we have historical documentation of us learning things that we used to think were unworldly until we discovered them. The first humans didn't even know they had brains. It used to be novel to think the Earth was round. I think most materialists run under the assumption that with infinite resources, a planet that was infinitely sustainable, scientific questions would keep getting answered.
If free will doesn't exist and we are just biochemical puppets in a epiphenomenal movie. That would be strong defense for materialism. It's not a strawman argument to say free will and materalism are incompatible. They are and all the new atheist admit to that.
Consciousness AKA (animal brain matter) should not manipulate space-time in a materialist Universe. There for no free will. But if free will does exist. We are forced to admit consciousness makes materialism look flawed. Why would an animals brain matter manipulate space-time? It's suppose to be a biochemical puppet that arose without purpose by dumb chance. The inner movie "consciousness" is mysterious either way.
Why does dark matter and energy allude materalism?
Why does Consciousness allude materalism?
Why does evolutionary biology challenge materalism?
Why Does free will (appear to exist) and why does quantum Physics appear to be influenced by consciousness?
Why does Consciousness allude materalism?
Why does evolutionary biology challenge materalism?
Why Does free will (appear to exist) and why does quantum Physics appear to be influenced by consciousness?
This is Venus's orbith cycle without the yellow dot. It still looks like a flower.
- Aug 5, 2019
- 1,852
- Tinnitus Since
- 05/2019
- Cause of Tinnitus
- Autoimmune hyperacusis from Sjogren's Syndrome
I agree that free will and materialism are incompatible. I do think it's possible that you can, without contradictions, believe in some free will. But it is binary, whether that belief is there or not. Even if you believe in some free will, you are undecided on the question of materialism, which is okay. But you are certainly not a materialist.
I currently lean hard on the side of a lack of free will. There are too many stories of people on drugs and having brain injuries completely changing who they are that I think the idea of earning an afterlife is a wash. I also think that free will is just cognitive dissonance in that it gives us a license to judge people with inferior biology without feeling elitest about our own good biological fortunes. For example, serial killers have biology that is incompatible with civilization. We know they need to be treated differently. But it's easier to say they are bad people who chose to harm others than it is to say they were given a poor biological hand, and we are just judging their luck.
I consider myself a permanent agnostic; I don't know much about quantum physics other than that it's a total fucking mess. To me, the question of free will is not that important since I think humans are fundamentally incapable of understanding the true meaning of it.
I currently lean hard on the side of a lack of free will. There are too many stories of people on drugs and having brain injuries completely changing who they are that I think the idea of earning an afterlife is a wash. I also think that free will is just cognitive dissonance in that it gives us a license to judge people with inferior biology without feeling elitest about our own good biological fortunes. For example, serial killers have biology that is incompatible with civilization. We know they need to be treated differently. But it's easier to say they are bad people who chose to harm others than it is to say they were given a poor biological hand, and we are just judging their luck.
I consider myself a permanent agnostic; I don't know much about quantum physics other than that it's a total fucking mess. To me, the question of free will is not that important since I think humans are fundamentally incapable of understanding the true meaning of it.
I agree we have an very limited degree of free will because of biology. Neverless it exist. Biology is just a host, for consciousness. There are also counter cases of terminal lucidity and people with severe brain damage retaining memories.
From the start in the 1920s it appeared consciousness was collapsing the wave function. It appears the true randomness (such as radioactive decay) is a precursor to what free will is.
Quantum Physics alluded materalism about a 100 years. Einstein assumed the particle was definite and hidden. (that got debunked) Now Sean Caroll defends the infinite copy paste branch off infinite Universes hypothesis to explain it away because that is suppose to be a more intellectual approach.
The founders of quantum theory, Freeman Dyson and Roger Penrose and many scientist at NASA stated that consciousness might have something to do with it. . There are people who entertain the possibility that consciousness collapses the wave function and they just aren't ranting and raving about it, because it's simply not relevant to their discipline or they don't want to be raise controversy.
There really are five possibilities
1: Any form of measurement tool collapses the wave function (this was challenged by carbon 60 molocules and macro quantum effects.
2: Consciousnesses (sensory perception) collapses the wave function
3: The wave function never collapses and infinite universes exist and new ones branch out into existence (Sean Caroll's model)
4: The particle is hidden (Einstein believed this)
5: There are 8 other illusive dimensions that hide the truth from us (string theory)
-
It's not about dogmatically believing sensory perception collapses the wave function, it's about taking the idea seriously and not being intimidated by people who make careers out of debating young earth creationist and homeopaths.
Here are all of Sir @JohnAdams scientific publications.
https://www.tinnitustalk.com/attachments/sir-johnadams-research-zip.37397/
https://www.tinnitustalk.com/attachments/sir-johnadams-research-zip.37397/
Log in or register to get the full forum benefits!
Similar threads
