@StoneInFocus, is this still your view?Kv7.2/7.3 channel openers for the treatment of tinnitus are way, way more scientifically sound than Dr. Shore's Auricle device, which is basically glorified acupuncture
@StoneInFocus, is this still your view?Kv7.2/7.3 channel openers for the treatment of tinnitus are way, way more scientifically sound than Dr. Shore's Auricle device, which is basically glorified acupuncture
No, because I haven't investigated Susan Shore's device enough to say anything sensible about it. I'm a bit out of the loop right now. Anything happen?@StoneInFocus, is this still your view?
Thanks for the information! I wonder if hyperacusis / noxacusis sufferers would qualify for the chronic pain study.Biohaven updated their pipeline for BHV-7000 Kv7.2. They are going to run four trials at once.
- Focal Epilepsy, Phase 1
- KCNQ2-DEE, Phase 1
- Mood Disorders, Phase 1
- Pain Disorders, Phase 1
I don't see the trials yet on ClinicalTrials.gov.
I'm not based in the US so I cannot apply, unfortunately.
I definitely would not say that - their latest presentation states:So no hope for tinnitus?
So basically we are hitching a ride and hoping for a glitch in the matrix.I definitely would not say that - their latest presentation states:
"Broad Potential in Adjacent Indications: Warrants further evaluation in BPD, depression, pain, others".
So might qualify under 'mood disorders' for the upcoming trials, or one of these other indications such as depression later (and with a bit of luck, maybe tinnitus will appear in the 'others' category). They also have a compassionate use program, so I'd say there are a number of paths to gain access.
Also, interesting to see they claim to have a differentiated formulation to the competition (meaning XEN1101):
"Pursuing Differentiation: Dialing out GABArisk (somnolence, sedation, dizziness) without impacting efficacy"
See here: https://ir.biohaven.com/static-files/2dfd9a38-a99c-460e-a27b-6b6ca537f4e1
It goes into a lot more detail on the advantages over XEN1101.
I'm inclined to believe the chances of Kv7 modulators helping with tinnitus are bigger than "a glitch in the matrix", but you're right about us once again having to hitch a ride on something designed primarily for another condition. This seems to be a recurring theme with potential pharmaceutical cures. Until the mechanics behind tinnitus are better understood, it looks like too big of a risk for a pharmaceutical company to pursue treatments specifically for our issues: Otonomy's failure and dissolution is the latest example of that.So basically we are hitching a ride and hoping for a glitch in the matrix.
That's a very interesting detail you highlighted here. There's a significant difference between this drug and XEN1101/Trobalt, and that is that the latter also affect GABA receptors. As many users' testimonials have highlighted, GABA-affecting substances (benzos, alcohol...) seem to help with certain forms of tinnitus. Could it be that Trobalt's benefit for tinnitus sufferers lied not in its Kv7 modulating properties but rather in its effect on GABA? If that was the case, then that could mean that XEN1101 would be the winner for us.Also, interesting to see they claim to have a differentiated formulation to the competition (meaning XEN1101):
"Pursuing Differentiation: Dialing out GABArisk (somnolence, sedation, dizziness) without impacting efficacy"
See here: https://ir.biohaven.com/static-files/2dfd9a38-a99c-460e-a27b-6b6ca537f4e1
It goes into a lot more detail on the advantages over XEN1101.
The research seems to point to KCNQ2/3 potassium channels as the primary mechanism. I haven't personally seen much on the GABA aspect but you have a good point. If both drugs make it to market, we may have an opportunity to find out!That's a very interesting detail you highlighted here. There's a significant difference between this drug and XEN1101/Trobalt, and that is that the latter also affect GABA receptors. As many users' testimonials have highlighted, GABA-affecting substances (benzos, alcohol...) seem to help with certain forms of tinnitus. Could it be that Trobalt's benefit for tinnitus sufferers lied not in its Kv7 modulating properties but rather in its effect on GABA? If that was the case, then that could mean that XEN1101 would be the winner for us.
Great news. I hope it happens early in H2!There was a publication today about BHV-7000 on Seeking Alpha (an investor platform). They are expecting a pivotal trial (Phase 3 or Phase 2/3) to take place in H2 2023. Seems a very aggressive approach. Maybe we are lucky and their patient recruitment is also very aggressive and fast. Did anyone reach out on the compassionate use program yet? If so, I'd recommend pain with tinnitus as the reason, not tinnitus alone.
With biotechs, the odds are stacked against you. 1/10 drugs are successful across the industry as a whole, but it's even wider with more complex drugs (an example would be Alzheimer's drugs).Please let me know if any of you have high expectations for the potassium channel modulators, but had low expectations for FX-322/FX-345 and OTO-413.
It would give me more confidence in your ability to foresee...
Where does it say that BHV-7000 has completed Phase 1 successfully? The way I read the PowerPoint, Biohaven just gives an update on the study, but the results are not conclusive yet. Also, their website seems to indicate that it's still in Phase 1 as well.BHV-7000 completed its Phase 1 successfully.
Preliminary Safety:This means it is moving to the simultaneous Phase 2/3 soon, which is presented in the forward statement. In the deck there is a nice comparison with the safety profile of XEN1101. It is pointing that BHV-7000 has a better safety profile.
- Single doses up to 100 mg and multiple doses up to 40 mg daily x15 days generally well-tolerated
- Most adverse events mild and resolved spontaneously
- No serious or severe adverse events
- No dose limiting toxicities
Biohaven | TD Cowen 43rd Annual Health Care Conference (PDF)
Thanks for that information! Great to read.XEN1101 binds to Kv7.4 somewhat well actually, with a Kv7.4 IC50 of 113nm, vs. an established Kv7.2/3 IC50 of 27nm, which is somewhere around 4x less potent, but if tolerable at large doses, some effect would be observed.
It would be nice though if Acousia Therapeutics' Kv7.4 activator got approved, because then we could really know for sure.
Page 8 of this PDF.
What happened here, have Biohaven acquired the rights and bought the product from Knopp Biosciences?Before it was transformed into BHV-7000 by Biohaven, it was named KB-3061 from Knopp Biosciences:
I think so. Yesterday I stumbled upon another Kv7.2 trial in Phase 1. I forgot to bookmark it but there are more companies working on this.What happened here, have Biohaven acquired the rights and bought the product from Knopp Biosciences?
I'd say so. I wouldn't be surprised if it influenced neuropathic pain too as antiepileptics are known to calm down nerves. Antidepressants and antiepileptics are the drugs of choice for neuropatic pain.@InNeedOfHelp, do you think the Kv7.2 modulators would help treat hyperacusis?
Interesting thoughts, @InNeedOfHelp! My understanding is ear fullness and clicking (TTTS) is a middle ear disease in that the muscles that connect to the stapes do not work properly. Sometimes Cyclobenzaprine is used to treat it.What I assume it will not solve are things like ear fullness, clicking, popping etc which seem more related to physical damage compared to something happening in the brain.
GABA has nothing to do with Kv channels.Hey all. Does anyone know the differences between the GABA in XEN1101 and non-GABA in BHV-7000? Does GABA have something to do with tinnitus reduction? Or is it more the Potassium channels? Between XEN1101 and BHV-7000, which would be your best bet?
Pfizer was already a pharmaceutical giant before COVID-19.I think it's good that Pfizer bought Biohaven as it will make the market launch much easier as most countries ended up using Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine.