I also do wonder. Maybe it's because there are a variety of epilepsy drugs on the market? Just none that work on that mechanism from what I can gather.
I'm hopeful the trials will wrap up next year and they can rush to production in 2025. Happy to try it out, as based on the size of their studies, I suspect many of the scarier side effects should be determined before then. I also hope no side effects come out in the larger trial that then cancel the drug.
As a new user here, I was reading through some of the old trial threads and saw how much hope folks had (e.g., Auris Medical, Otonomy, etc.). I am praying this does not follow suit and we get a breakthrough.
That seems to be the case. I wonder what the difference is between Trobalt and other anti-epilepsy drugs out in the market. If these new reformulated drugs can get rid of or reduce the amount of seizures in an epilepsy patient, and are safer compared to these current drugs, they should at least receive FDA Fast Track status.
I was a big believer in the hearing regeneration drugs but now I've switched to Kv7 potassium channel openers and VX-548 (for pain) for the time being. Spiral Therapeutics have bought OTO-413 and right now they are investigating it to see if it can be reformulated with their new delivery method. The low dose trial was the one that passed whereas the higher dose trials failed.
FDA: Fast track
FDA said:
Any drug being developed to treat or prevent a condition with no current therapy obviously is directed at an unmet need. If there are available therapies, a fast track drug must show some advantage over available therapy, such as:
- Showing superior effectiveness, effect on serious outcomes or improved effect on serious outcomes
- Avoiding serious side effects of an available therapy
- Improving the diagnosis of a serious condition where early diagnosis results in an improved outcome
- Decreasing a clinical significant toxicity of an available therapy that is common and causes discontinuation of treatment
- Ability to address emerging or anticipated public health need
So potentially BHV-7000 and XEN1101 could receive FDA Fast Track status and possibly Breakthrough Therapy status if they can show their drugs are more potent, safer and more effective as the FDA considers epilepsy to be a serious condition.
I wonder if Xenon Pharmaceuticals and Biohaven have enough data to show that their drugs are more potent, safer and more effective compared to current anti-epilepsy drugs to apply for both FDA Fast Track status and Breakthrough Therapy status. Biohaven's BHV-7000 seems to be the one to have a better chance at getting these two statuses from the FDA due to Pfizer's acquisition and having multiple clinical trials relating to BHV-7000.
@InNeedOfHelp, do you reckon they will start the Phase 2/3 pivotal phase for BHV-7000 after they release the full EEG results from the Phase 1 trials at the end of the year? If that's the case, we might not see them start the pivotal phase until November or December.
How was Retigabine approved in the first place? I'm wondering if BHV-7000 and XEN1101 will suffer the same fate as Retigabine where the severe side effects don't show in the trials but years later after it has been approved.
It's going to be a shame if it ends up helping tinnitus and hyperacusis/noxacusis sufferers but then gets pulled due to the severe side effects.