Thanks a lot for sharing this. I feel like a new Research News thread could be started for Eliem Therapeutics. I really like how they continually state "Neuronal Excitability Disorders" on the website and as their target, which tinnitus absolutely is, but they don't mention tinnitus as a specific area to target. Maybe an email inquiring about it might give us an idea if it's on their radar at all.According to this paper, Kv7.5 is heavily expressed in the auditory brain. I hope it doesn't play a role in tinnitus maintenance...
The potassium channel KCNQ5/Kv7.5 is localized in synaptic endings of auditory brainstem nuclei of the rat
Also, there's another company, Eliem Theraputics, coming out with a Kv7.2/7.3 modulator, codenamed ETX-123, Phase 1 beginning in 1H 2024. From the figures posted in the below presentation, it binds to Kv7.2/3 and Kv7.3/5 more potently than XEN1101...
Eliem Therapeutics: Clinical Stage Neurology Company Focused on Neuronal Excitability Disorders (PDF)
Sorry if you've mentioned it before, but did Retigabine help your tinnitus?From my experience, Retigabine tablets are not divisible in themselves, but with a scalpel and a small precision scale you can do it with an acceptable margin of error.
It helped my somatic tinnitus, yes, it 90% vanished for 1 hour.Sorry if you've mentioned it before, but did Retigabine help your tinnitus?
How long had you had tinnitus prior to taking Trobalt?But I remember I was one day basically tinnitus-free for 1 hour, i.e. impossible to hear it unless being in perfectly silent room.
I got my tinnitus 3 years ago, so it seems to work for chronic cases.How long had you had tinnitus prior to taking Trobalt?
You had tinnitus 3 years BEFORE you used Trobalt?I got my tinnitus 3 years ago, so it seems to work for chronic cases.
Indeed.You had tinnitus 3 years BEFORE you used Trobalt?
1 hour of respite from what dose? It sounds impractical to take even if there were no side effects...It helped my somatic tinnitus, yes, it 90% vanished for 1 hour.
It probably did something for the non-somatic tinnitus, but far less than for my somatic tinnitus.
But I remember I was one day basically tinnitus-free for 1 hour, i.e. impossible to hear it unless being in perfectly silent room.
300 mg and 400 mg.1 hour of respite from what dose? It sounds impractical to take even if there were no side effects...
I may be joining you in this experiment next month.300 mg and 400 mg.
It's very random, sometimes 300 mg works better than 400 mg etc, but under 300 mg there are no effects at all.
Side effects are pretty heavy but manageable.
Yes, not very convenient.
My best hope with Retigabine is to get definitive effects with a cure of 3 months max.
In any case, we need a reformulation.
Both.I may be joining you in this experiment next month.
Do you take it as in like someone would take an Aspirin? Or three times a day?
Does the tinnitus suddenly return after an hour or is the increase gradual?
My concern with these potassium channel modulators is they may be too selective. In other words, it's the wide spectrum of Trobalt that makes it effective for many. Yes, I know what the literature shows but it's animal models and relates to acute tinnitus. It also doesn't directly imply causation as it is just a finding so to speak.
Thanks for your detailed reply @Kleiner. It's very interesting.Both.
In January I took it x3/day for 2 weeks; it worked only 2 times.
I adopted an Aspirin approach, x2-3 per week in the month of May; 100% of success.
In August I tried x3 per day for 1 month; most doses worked but it was pretty random.
I recommend taking it on an empty stomach.
The tinnitus slowly returns to baseline, but it tends to be weaker for a few hours, which may be the placebo effect.
You share my concerns too. You summed it up well, but we can't be sure of it yet.
Yes, this has always been the case so far, from almost nothing to heavy side effects. Most of the time it is a state comparable to alcohol psychologically, but without the effects of nausea and such. And it's very selective.Thanks for your detailed reply @Kleiner. It's very interesting.
Did you get the common side effects like dizziness and confusion for a few hours?
Hahaha, bloody hell, you're not convincing me much @Kleiner, although some people pay good money for LSD and acid. I only hope I can achieve some efficacy at lower doses, like some people did. I suppose knowing the side effects only last a short time helps. I remember, just about, how spaced I was the first time I took 300 mg of Gabapentin. I was bouncing off walls.I had 5-6x heavier effects, psychoses, hallucinations, but I was in an unstable mental state and I was taking it with Gabapentin, so it was difficult to draw conclusions.
These heavy side effects were also associated with Gabapentin and my emotional state so it's hard to be sure. I prefer to warn when in the doubt.Hahaha, bloody hell, you're not convincing me much @Kleiner, although some people pay good money for LSD and acid. I only hope I can achieve some efficacy at lower doses, like some people did. I suppose knowing the side effects only last a short time helps. I remember, just about, how spaced I was the first time I took 300 mg of Gabapentin. I was bouncing off walls.
I think neuroinflammation is hype generally. A buzzword. As for Dr. De Ridder, my respect for him has dwindled and his proposals for a 'War on Tinnitus' seem theoretical and not linked to much research.We know from the past studies that neuroinflammation may play a role in tinnitus. Dr. De Ridder also says so.
"Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFα) may promote neuroinflammation prompting tinnitus."
I've said this for years about hearing tests. As someone who's been through the rigors of medical school, there is not a single OBJECTIVE test for hearing loss, only a subjective audiogram. It would be akin to walking into your ophthalmologist's office, reading the Snellen eye chart, and calling it a day. You may be able to read a line on the charger even though it's slightly blurry, but slight damage to our auditory system can be enough to trigger permanent tinnitus.I think neuroinflammation is hype generally. A buzzword. As for Dr. De Ridder, my respect for him has dwindled and his proposals for a 'War on Tinnitus' seem theoretical and not linked to much research.
Now when I say hype, I'm talking about tinnitus. Neuroinflammation may be linked to many diseases but for the vast majority with tinnitus it's a change in hearing function, temporary or permanent. A normal audiogram does not exclude you from this. Those without a history of loud noise exposure may have age-related hearing decline. There is little evidence I've seen that anti-inflammatory products resolve tinnitus, although they may reduce it a little in a select few.
Interesting.Here's a study that show what happens to Kv7.2/7.3 channels after going through excitotoxicity. Basically at high Glutamate loads, the surrounding membrane engulfs the channels and it is said this action is IRREVERSIBLE. I don't like this. Maybe this is why Retigabine had sporadic results, because something is permanently lost inside...
Feel free to enlighten me.
Live Imaging of Kv7.2/7.3 Cell Surface Dynamics at the Axon Initial Segment: High Steady-State Stability and Calpain-Dependent Excitotoxic Downregulation Revealed
Have any studies or research been carried out into a possible link between increased Glutamate levels via sensory pathways other than sound (movement of the neck, jaw, etc.) stimulating/increasing tinnitus that is already present?Here's a study that show what happens to Kv7.2/7.3 channels after going through excitotoxicity. Basically at high Glutamate loads, the surrounding membrane engulfs the channels and it is said this action is IRREVERSIBLE. I don't like this. Maybe this is why Retigabine had sporadic results, because something is permanently lost inside...
Feel free to enlighten me.
Live Imaging of Kv7.2/7.3 Cell Surface Dynamics at the Axon Initial Segment: High Steady-State Stability and Calpain-Dependent Excitotoxic Downregulation Revealed
Thanks for sharing. I'm no researcher or scientist so I don't know if it makes a difference when it comes to this, but I think something more positive to remember is the Biohaven and Xenon Pharmaceuticals drugs are said to be much more potent at these Kv7 channel sites than Retigabine. These are the first of their kind in terms of selection channels, potency, and (so far) reportedly way less side effect risk than Retigabine. Maybe these drugs will give relief for a significantly longer period of time while in system. Just me trying to be hopeful, I guess.Here's a study that show what happens to Kv7.2/7.3 channels after going through excitotoxicity. Basically at high Glutamate loads, the surrounding membrane engulfs the channels and it is said this action is IRREVERSIBLE. I don't like this. Maybe this is why Retigabine had sporadic results, because something is permanently lost inside...
Feel free to enlighten me.
Live Imaging of Kv7.2/7.3 Cell Surface Dynamics at the Axon Initial Segment: High Steady-State Stability and Calpain-Dependent Excitotoxic Downregulation Revealed
I emailed Dr. Tzounopoulos in 2020 concerning the state of potassium channels after acoustic damage (which can be the outcome of glutamate excitotoxicity).Here's a study that show what happens to Kv7.2/7.3 channels after going through excitotoxicity. Basically at high Glutamate loads, the surrounding membrane engulfs the channels and it is said this action is IRREVERSIBLE. I don't like this. Maybe this is why Retigabine had sporadic results, because something is permanently lost inside...
Feel free to enlighten me.
Live Imaging of Kv7.2/7.3 Cell Surface Dynamics at the Axon Initial Segment: High Steady-State Stability and Calpain-Dependent Excitotoxic Downregulation Revealed
Christiaan said:Dear Dr. Tzounopoulos,
Thank you very much for partaking in the Tinnitus Talk podcast. The interview was very insightful, but foremostly hopeful. Thank you for giving people like me hope.
However, I hope you don't mind me asking a small question about the potassium channels. You've mentioned in the interview that one of the possibilities why a potassium channel is not working, is that the channel might not make it to the membrane after acoustic damage. Does this mean that the RL-81 pill might not work for those whose potassium channels are damaged? I've also an additional question: how can we know if the potassium channels are damaged?
With kind regards,
Christiaan
Link: https://www.tinnitustalk.com/posts/531197/Dr. Tzounopoulos said:We can't measure potassium channel activity in humans
If potassium channels are not in the plasma membrane, RL-81 would not work
In mice, after noise trauma, the channels are in the plasma membrane but they do not open
Best, Thanos
This is food for thought and certainly may explain the scattergun, although generally efficacious result of Retigabine.Basically at high Glutamate loads, the surrounding membrane engulfs the channels and it is said this action is IRREVERSIBLE. I don't like this. Maybe this is why Retigabine had sporadic results, because something is permanently lost inside...
Trial completion September 2025.