I don't even know what you are talking about...Wrong. Each country has the right to pursue their sovereignty and refuse.
The rule of law means nothing nowadays so you might as well insist on securing your sovereign rights.
I don't even know what you are talking about...Wrong. Each country has the right to pursue their sovereignty and refuse.
The rule of law means nothing nowadays so you might as well insist on securing your sovereign rights.
I think Austria proposed setting a minimum price for airline tickets to fight low-cost tourism, massive tourism. It was at least announced in the press. I am not totally sure if it was approved in Austria.That's an interesting story @Juan. The recycle sector seems to be a booming business and there's still hope left for many for us here that it will play an important step towards more sustainability.
You're absolutely spot on about tourism as one of the most polluting factors of the current climate situation. You've probably heard or seen the news about the lack of courage of the European Parliament to impose laws and restrictions to make ''over tourism'' less attractive (e.g. cheap short destination flight tickets), as some EU countries, that largely depend on it, are afraid of killing the goose that lays the golden eggs. Hopefully the MEPs of the EVP and right-wing factions will see that change is necessary to commit to climate neutrality by 2050.
You're wrong. Spanish people are not in favour of receiving tons of refugees and illegal immigrants.You are in the very small minority of Spaniards who do not like living next door to refugees. Spain (and the Spaniards) is one of the most welcoming countries for refugees. In fact, Europe overall, with a few exceptions such as "right-wing" Hungary, are very welcoming to refugees. So whatever few hundreds or thousands of Afghan refugees you will bring over as a result of Biden's failure pales in comparison to the millions of refugees you already have, so you can hardly blame refugee issues in Spain on the U.S.
Spain is the most welcoming EU country for refugees, survey finds
For the umpteenth time, Afghanistan, with bin Laden, started this war by attacking the United States and killing three thousand innocent people, on 9/11/2001. The country of Afghanistan refused to hand bin Laden over to us, he kept threatening to launch more, even deadlier, attacks, and we had to stop him - which we did.You're wrong. Spanish people are not in favour of receiving tons of refugees and illegal immigrants.
It was Angela Merkel who said Germany would welcome 1 million refugees from the Syrian war (another US absurdity) in 2016.
So it is about time the US is held accountable and takes responsibility for its actions. I think the refugees from the Afghan war should go to the US, which is the country that started the conflict and created the whole mess.
You don't understand this was a reaction to the Gulf War the US started in the 90s, and to the war in Irak which was started by the US on fake evidence, pretending Irak possessed weapons of mass destruction, which was not true. Actually the US even forced an UN resolution on those "weapons of mass destructions" they had invented.. it was all made up by the US.For the umpteenth time, Afghanistan, with bin Laden, started this war by attacking the United States and killing three thousand innocent people, on 9/11/2001. The country of Afghanistan refused to hand bin Laden over to us, he kept threatening to launch more, even deadlier, attacks, and we had to stop him - which we did.
What is it about this that you do not understand?
Why doesn't Spanish citizens demand that their government say NO?You're wrong. Spanish people are not in favour of receiving tons of refugees and illegal immigrants.
It was Angela Merkel who said Germany would welcome 1 million refugees from the Syrian war (another US absurdity) in 2016.
So it is about time the US is held accountable and takes responsibility for its actions. I think the refugees from the Afghan war should go to the US, which is the country that started the conflict and created the whole mess.
You don't know a lot of things.I don't even know what you are talking about...
Afghanistan was totally uncooperative, they didn't say that they could not find bin Laden, they said that they would not hand him over to the United States. If they had said that they could not locate him, but would cooperate with the United States in trying to find him, that would have been a different situation, entirely.You don't understand this was a reaction to the Gulf War the US started in the 90s, and to the war in Irak which was started by the US on fake evidence, pretending Irak possessed weapons of mass destruction, which was not true. Actually the US even forced an UN resolution on those "weapons of mass destructions" they had invented.. it was all made up by the US.
The Republicans who started those wars on fake evidence should have taken the responsibility for it and legal action should have been taken against them.
And again, a COUNTRY does NOT know where terrorists hide, and this is no exception in Afghanistan either. I wish we had known in Spain; we would have saved ourselves from decades of terrorism.
This is like Spain saying to France "hey, hand over those ETA terrorist". And of course the French want to find those terrorists too, but they just don't know where they are hiding.
You're lucky to have such a landlord. Not all landlords are willing to open their wallets for something like maintenance costs and there are a lot of people who just have to suck it up because they have nowhere else to go. If it's government owned, well, that's not always perfect (certainly not in the Netherlands), but there are often a clear set of rules to which a public house cooperation is obligated, such as covering security of tenure, rent, rent increases and maintenance.My reasons for not owning a home, have nothing to do with being priced out of it I simply do not want to take on the responsibilities of homeownership, so I rent and leave the repairs, heating, upkeep, property taxes, etc. to the landlord who is performing services that I reimburse him for. Many people feel this way. I would never want all housing to be government-owned, I support the free markets even though I have no real estate and never have.
I've never heard of this case and I don't know why he would be glorified for what he had done. There's not a lot of people here who are anti-police, for instance.The first political activity that I saw while visiting Amsterdam, in the 1990's, was a demonstration in support of the American prisoner Mumia Abu-Jamal, born 1954, who was convicted of and sentenced to death for the murder of a police officer in Philadelphia in 1981. His death sentence was overturned in 2001, and he is serving a life sentence. I can not understand why this man, a convicted cop killer, has been glorified not only in the Netherlands but other European countries including France, where a street in Paris has been named after him.
Recently, in April 2021, the United Nations has been concerned about the killer's comfort, during a stay in the prison hospital for heart failure.
The article below fails to mention that Mumia Abu Jamal was tried in court and convicted by a jury of his peers, not simply "charged". Get out the handkerchiefs, and bring on the violins.
USA: Shackling of aged inmate, Mumia Abu-Jamal, is deplorable - UN experts
It has nothing to do with "luck", it is the law that landlords must provide the basic services that you pay for, otherwise, you can take them to housing court. If the landlord does not comply, he can be fined in addition to paying for whatever it is he has neglected.You're lucky to have such a landlord. Not all landlords are willing to open their wallets for something like maintenance costs and there are a lot of people who just have to suck it up because they have nowhere else to go. If it's government owned, well, that's not always perfect (certainly not in the Netherlands), but there are often a clear set of rules to which a public house cooperation is obligated, such as covering security of tenure, rent, rent increases and maintenance.
Over 20 years later, since I was there, they are still at it. It's a fringe group, I guess, in the Netherlands. It is not surprising then, that you have not heard of it. But the French did name a street after this man, in Paris. Other countries have support networks for the killer, as well.I've never heard of this case and I don't know why he would be glorified for what he had done. There's not a lot of people here who are anti-police, for instance.
So you think this was necessary:After 9/11, Osama Bin Laden had promised more attacks against the citizens of the United States, I am very glad that this was not permitted to happen. I'm sorry about the collateral damage and the loss of American and other allied countries' service members' lives, but invading Afghanistan was something that had to be done, unless of course we simply bombed them relentlessly, and killed a few hundred thousand of them, which is perhaps the better choice if we must fight them again.
Hahaha you have to be kidding. For a start Spanish people demonstrated against the Irak war!Why doesn't Spanish citizens demand that their government say NO?
Of course, you have no answer.
That is terrible, but so was 9/11. If Afghanistan had not declared war on us by allowing bin Laden to operate, it would not have happened. War is never nice.So you think this was necessary:
US airstrikes killed at least 22,000 civilians since 9/11, analysis finds | Global development | The Guardian
Well, so for you it seems to be ok that the US just killed 22.000 innocent civilians...That is terrible, but so was 9/11. If Afghanistan had not declared war on us by allowing bin Laden to operate, it would not have happened. War is never nice.
I agree that twenty years was way too long to be there. We could have nuked the hills where bin Laden and Al Qaeda were hiding, in 2001, and the conflict would have been over in one day.Well, so for you it seems to be ok that the US just killed 22.000 innocent civilians...
And no, Afghanistan did NOT declare war on the US. You can think whatever you want, that's one thing... but you cannot alter the truth.
That's not very nice, you know.Hahaha you have to be kidding. For a start Spanish people demonstrated against the Irak war!
Go learn some history
And do you have any comments on the 22,000 innocent civilians killed by the US?I agree that twenty years was way too long to be there. We could have nuked the hills where bin Laden and Al Qaeda were hiding, in 2001, and the conflict would have been over in one day.
We should have nuked the hills and mountains where Al Qaeda and Bin Laden were hiding, but that would have been considered unacceptable by the rest of the world, thus 22,000 casualties.And do you have any comments on the 22,000 innocent civilians killed by the US?
Innocent civilians killed is the unfortunate by-product of war, as a result of back and forth attacks, since the beginning of time. Just most recently, under Biden's epic failed withdrawal, a drone strike killed 10 members of a single family in Kabul. Had the terrorists not attacked first and killed/injured dozens (including non-military) at the airport (which could have been easily avoided), this particular strike would not have happened.And do you have any comments on the 22,000 innocent civilians killed by the US?
I think he is saying the 3000 Americans were killed in response to us killing civilians? I don't know. It's like the same stuff between you guys daily lol.We should have nuked the hills and mountains where Al Qaeda and Bin Laden were hiding, but that would have been considered unacceptable by the rest of the world, thus 22,000 casualties.
I have thus far held off from asking this, but what should we have done when Osama bin Laden hed a terrorist attack from Afghanistan, killing 3,000 Americans and proclaimed that more such attacks were forthcoming? What should our response have been?
I am not saying that there could have been 22.000 civilians killed by the US.We should have nuked the hills and mountains where Al Qaeda and Bin Laden were hiding, but that would have been considered unacceptable by the rest of the world, thus 22,000 casualties.
Oh yeah... we saw that in Japan when the US dropped atomic bombs on civil population. We also saw it in Vietnam.Innocent civilians killed is the unfortunate by-product of war
But we are against it, Spanish people are against it. Democracy is just hijacked here completely. Illegal immigration and the successive waves of refugees are a business ruled and run by bureaucrats and fake NGOs. Do you know how much those EU officials specialised in immigration and refugees make? They earn a ton of money out of creating problems for others.I was just saying that Spaniards should say, "no, we are not accepting any more refugees/migrants, whatever. "
In war, from the perspective of the "good" side, you have to pick the lesser of two evils. Name a major war where innocent civilians did not die.Oh yeah... we saw that in Japan when the US dropped atomic bombs on civil population. We also saw it in Vietnam.
More recently we saw that in Irak and Afghanistan.
You have not answered the question as to what we should have done in response to the attacks of 9/11, to stop bin Laden from carrying out further attacks.I am not saying that there could have been 22.000 civilians killed by the US.
I am saying there were 22.000 innocent civilians killed by the US.
It seems you can only see your angle, but you do not understand the whole situation and how absurd Republican wars produced it.
Yes, the war started in the Middle East was a mistake. I don't know how anyone could disagree with that (?)I am not saying that there could have been 22.000 civilians killed by the US.
I am saying there were 22.000 innocent civilians killed by the US.
It seems you can only see your angle, but you do not understand the whole situation and how absurd Republican wars produced it.
Again, nefarious characters in top positions with a lot to gain, wanted to test out their new toy, developed for them (innocently I might add) by the genius mind of Robert Oppenheimer, who expressed deep regret at it's use.Oh yeah... we saw that in Japan when the US dropped atomic bombs on civil population. We also saw it in Vietnam.
More recently we saw that in Irak and Afghanistan.
No offense, I like you @Juan, but I think you need a little perspective here:I think Biden will have to do all the work the previous president neglected. This will include tapering and raising interest rates. So Biden will take all the blame just for doing his job, the job that the previous president did not dare to do.
The difference being that neither Irak nor Afghanistan ever declared war on the US: it was a conflict started unilaterally by US Republicans on fake evidence, like the non-existent weapons of mass destruction.In war, from the perspective of the "good" side, you have to pick the lesser of two evils. Name a major war where innocent civilians did not die.