2020 US Presidential Election

I did respond. I just didn't agree with you that the majority of the protesters were violent or that confederate statues needed to stay up to remember history (guess everyone forgot about the Berlin Wall since it got taken down...).

To you, it's not a "response" if it's not a unilateral agreement of your point of view. You are so utterly, unequivocally convinced that you have the absolute correct perspective on everything that anything not met with "wow you are right! Liberals are violent Marxist scumbags!" Counts as "ignoring the issues" to you.

You absolutely will not accept any point of view but your own and then blame anyone who responds to you for not framing the issues the way you do.

Edit: I hate my tone in this post. I'm super irritated and I don't want to be and this is exactly why I don't want to respond. I should have just let it be.
There's violence EVERYDAY there! Want me to spam this thread with it? You're irritated and frustrated? Lol. Get in line.

All of you liberals just shrug it off or you're in denial. I don't need to be convinced that I have the "right" view because you are so immersed in Clown World.
 
Oh, I also don't support vandalism. That's another complaint by me. Despite thinking tearing down statues is stupid, I think they could try to negotiate with both public and private parties to remove them. But, no, they don't. They unilaterally decide they have the authority to remove them. That's another topic though. I just thought I would mention another example but no one cares about that.

I guess I don't care how F*** up your country gets but I am afraid it will eventually influence my pos country. So, consider this, just observations.
 
There's violence EVERYDAY there! Want me to spam this thread with it? You're irritated and frustrated? Lol. Get in line.

All of you liberals just shrug it off or you're in denial. I don't need to be convinced that I have the "right" view because you are so immersed in Clown World.
If I spammed this thread with countless police brutality cases, would you agree it's a problem? Or would you say it's a "few bad apples"? Or, worse, that the victims must have deserved it?

Re: BLM. This video might offer a different perspective on BLM (this is less directed at @PeteJ who has his mind made up and more for any one else reading this thread):

 
If I spammed this thread with countless police brutality cases, would you agree it's a problem? Or would you say it's a "few bad apples"? Or, worse, that the victims must have deserved it?

Re: BLM. This video might offer a different perspective on BLM (this is less directed at @PeteJ who has his mind made up and more for any one else reading this thread):
I thought I addressed police brutality on here? No? I don't want to beat a dead horse but statistics already proved that whites are killed more often and black cops kill more blacks than white cops do etc. etc. BLM didn't just make it about police brutality. They have made their position clear. Their politics are clear. I don't think you want to go down that road. For some reason, you wanted to grasp at straws. There's violence and vandalism everyday by these protesters. Nice video you presented but that is an exception but lo and behold, it's another "blame whitey" again. Do you think stupid white activists associated with antifa represent most whites? Was that your point? Brainwashed idiots who are the product of the liberal education system is *your* invention. Your problem.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-myth-of-systemic-police-racism-11591119883
 
Oh, I also don't support vandalism. That's another complaint by me. Despite thinking tearing down statues is stupid, I think they could try to negotiate with both public and private parties to remove them. But, no, they don't. They unilaterally decide they have the authority to remove them. That's another topic though. I just thought I would mention another example but no one cares about that.

I guess I don't care how F*** up your country gets but I am afraid it will eventually influence my pos country. So, consider this, just observations.
I am a sculptor and artist. Why is tearing down sculptures stupid? Most public sculptures in the west until modern abstract sculpture came about often depicted generals, leaders, kings the ruling elite. Some were murderers and tyrants whose image were put in bronze to reinforce their power and ideologies. Be it Stalin, Idi Amin, or Saddam Hussein or king Leopold I Belgium. His troops would put dynamite sticks into Africans asses when celebrating Bastille day. I understand the anger and compulsion to bring specific symbols down just like the confederate flag and generals who fought for maintaining the slave system. I find these symbols hurtful and threatening and I am not a descendant of slaves. Can you imagine being black and have to see those symbols on government buildings or other places in your everyday life especially in the south where they are popular?Check out Tulsa Oklahoma in 1921 if you get a chance, enlightening.

I fully support the movement for social justice for African Americans. Until their liberties and sanctity of life are recognized and respected and the terror that has been perpetuated against these people is stopped my country's soul and potential to heal will not happen.

Tried to stay out of this but hey... it's one of those days.

Nearly forgot...

You can bet your life savings that the fathers and mothers of the hearing regeneration movement are card carrying liberals. These nerdy scientists are not in your clown world, whatever that is. They are often typical "liberals " like Stephen Heller at Stanford or Liberman at Mass Eye and Ear. They defer to science, not to scripture. The scientists who will save us are very far from the likes of the Orange haired leader of the "free world" who rejects science and embraces race hate.

Get on your knees and suck the nut of the liberal scientific community that's going to usher in hearing regeneration and save your ass.

Having said all that, I sincerely hope your tinnitus and audiological issues improve, I know you are hurting.
 
You can bet your life savings that the fathers and mothers of the hearing regeneration movement are card carrying liberals. These nerdy scientists are not in your clown world, whatever that is. They are often typical "liberals " like Stephen Heller at Stanford or Liberman at Mass Eye and Ear. They defer to science, not to scripture. The scientists who will save us are very far from the likes of the Orange haired leader of the "free world" who rejects science and embraces race hate.
If you check out Twitter, and the personal accounts of a lot of the hearing and tinnitus researchers, you can tell you are totally correct and they are heavily skewed liberal.

It's not just the researchers, either. Check out a lot of the CEOs, CMOs etc of the associated biotechs personal Twitter accounts.
 
Oh shit I thought Kanye West running for President 2020 was a joke but he's actually serious.

What are your opinions on this? To be honest I think this is a way for Donald Trump to be reelected again by taking away the Biden supporters. A vote for West is a vote for Trump.
He hasnt filed any of the papers to run yet. People dont take him nearly as seriously as they used to, i dont think if he ran he would get substantial votes.
 
He hasnt filed any of the papers to run yet. People dont take him nearly as seriously as they used to, i dont think if he ran he would get substantial votes.
There is a conspiracy theory that he is running at the request of the Trump campaign to siphon votes based on the fact that Ivanka was in Wyoming (where he recently bought a ranch) when he announced his run and Kanye has financially benefited from the Trump family.

That's too circumstantial to be hard evidence but I can't figure out why else he suddenly wants to run this late in the cycle. Unless it's just a manic episode...
 
I am a sculptor and artist. Why is tearing down sculptures stupid? Most public sculptures in the west until modern abstract sculpture came about often depicted generals, leaders, kings the ruling elite. Some were murderers and tyrants whose image were put in bronze to reinforce their power and ideologies. Be it Stalin, Idi Amin, or Saddam Hussein or king Leopold I Belgium. His troops would put dynamite sticks into Africans asses when celebrating Bastille day. I understand the anger and compulsion to bring specific symbols down just like the confederate flag and generals who fought for maintaining the slave system. I find these symbols hurtful and threatening and I am not a descendant of slaves. Can you imagine being black and have to see those symbols on government buildings or other places in your everyday life especially in the south where they are popular?Check out Tulsa Oklahoma in 1921 if you get a chance, enlightening.

I fully support the movement for social justice for African Americans. Until their liberties and sanctity of life are recognized and respected and the terror that has been perpetuated against these people is stopped my country's soul and potential to heal will not happen.

Tried to stay out of this but hey... it's one of those days.

Nearly forgot...

You can bet your life savings that the fathers and mothers of the hearing regeneration movement are card carrying liberals. These nerdy scientists are not in your clown world, whatever that is. They are often typical "liberals " like Stephen Heller at Stanford or Liberman at Mass Eye and Ear. They defer to science, not to scripture. The scientists who will save us are very far from the likes of the Orange haired leader of the "free world" who rejects science and embraces race hate.

Get on your knees and suck the nut of the liberal scientific community that's going to usher in hearing regeneration and save your ass.

Having said all that, I sincerely hope your tinnitus and audiological issues improve, I know you are hurting.
Beautifully said. And I don't think any of this is to say liberals are perfect, but they do offer major strengths. The lefty nutjob is a bit of a straw man.
 
You can bet your life savings that the fathers and mothers of the hearing regeneration movement are card carrying liberals. These nerdy scientists are not in your clown world, whatever that is. They are often typical "liberals " like Stephen Heller at Stanford or Liberman at Mass Eye and Ear. They defer to science, not to scripture. The scientists who will save us are very far from the likes of the Orange haired leader of the "free world" who rejects science and embraces race hate.

Get on your knees and suck the nut of the liberal scientific community that's going to usher in hearing regeneration and save your ass.
And with whose money are they going to accomplish this with? Liberal artists and scientists thrive and often literally survive off the production and wealth generated by free-market, capitalistic proponents (often right-wingers). They can work for years in studios and labs and not accomplish much as long as they have an idea or a vision and a patron to fund them (modern day Government). Countries with far-left economic policies do not produce the wealth that is often needed to fund these types of endeavors over the long-term.
 
And with whose money are they going to accomplish this with? Liberal artists and scientists thrive and often literally survive off the production and wealth generated by free-market, capitalistic proponents (often right-wingers). They can work for years in studios and labs and not accomplish much as long as they have an idea or a vision and a patron to fund them (modern day Government). Countries with far-left economic policies do not produce the wealth that is often needed to fund these types of endeavors over the long-term.
I understand the point you are trying to make but the human genome project is a good counter example to this. There were two groups competing to sequence first: government funded/university groups and private industry (Celera). The university group actually sequenced first.

The way it was told to me (I briefly dated one of the computer scientists on the UC Santa Cruz bioinformatics team--still friends with him so I can find out more if anyone is interested) was they (publically funded researchers) were *highly* driven to be first because they knew if it was patented, it would be a huge financial road block to addressing genetic disease in the future.

Of course, scientists need funding, but government funding is where a *lot* of basic research comes from and is an important step before a drug is ready to develop. Biotech isn't going to spend 30 years learning about the inner ear to then start preclinical trials. They work off the backs of publically funded basic research first.

The truth is both groups are needed. Most liberals acknowledge this (hence the overwhelming preference for Scandinavian type socialist policies and not China).
 
Liberal artists and scientists thrive and often literally survive off the production and wealth generated by free-market, capitalistic proponents (often right-wingers).
Are you really making an argument that scientists -- a group laughably underpaid -- should be grateful that anyone funds them at all? According to https://www.payscale.com/research/US/Job=Chemist/Salary , the average chemist salary is $56,281. Think about how important that job is.

Here's the actual truth. Religious zealots talk ad nauseam about prayer, but when push comes to shove, they are the first ones to steal all of the hard work of scientists.

If anything, scientists are economically oppressed and provide all of the actual value. But thank the good lord that some C level asshat knows how to market the scientist's cure for cancer.

If anything, the businessman should get on their knees and worship the scientist who got them rich.
 
To be clear about my post above, there's a real argument to be made about removing some of the red tape and regulations (so that, for example, FX-322 can arrive sooner). But to say that scientists should be thankful to right wingers wreaks of decades of privilege. Scientists should be thankful for themselves and left and right wingers should be thankful for them.
 
To be clear about my post above, there's a real argument to be made about removing some of the red tape and regulations (so that, for example, FX-322 can arrive sooner). But to say that scientists should be thankful to right wingers wreaks of decades of privilege. Scientists should be thankful for themselves and left and right wingers should be thankful for them.
Perhaps you didn't understand me, or the concept of how things work in a society with voluntary exchange. Being thankful has nothing to do with it. One party exchanges their goods and services for someone else's goods and services. Liberal scientists are no more righteous than a theoretical conservative industrialist. One side does not need to pleasure the other because I would argue the relationship is symbiotic and equal. Also, Donald Trump has helped to remove some of that red tape. It is of an absolute fact, capitalism has allowed for wealth to be produced at rates not seen throughout human history. This has allowed the resources to be moved from basic needs to the advanced sciences. No one owes anyone anything. I am extremely grateful for the advances of scientific research, they should be thankful for the opportunity. Political affiliation matters not.
 
I understand the point you are trying to make but the human genome project is a good counter example to this. There were two groups competing to sequence first: government funded/university groups and private industry (Celera). The university group actually sequenced first.

The way it was told to me (I briefly dated one of the computer scientists on the UC Santa Cruz bioinformatics team--still friends with him so I can find out more if anyone is interested) was they (publically funded researchers) were *highly* driven to be first because they knew if it was patented, it would be a huge financial road block to addressing genetic disease in the future.

Of course, scientists need funding, but government funding is where a *lot* of basic research comes from and is an important step before a drug is ready to develop. Biotech isn't going to spend 30 years learning about the inner ear to then start preclinical trials. They work off the backs of publically funded basic research first.

The truth is both groups are needed. Most liberals acknowledge this (hence the overwhelming preference for Scandinavian type socialist policies and not China).
There are always counter examples. Capitalism and free-societies have accelerated wealth production at rates never seen in the history of man-kind. When resources can be moved from basic needs to advanced science, we all benefit.
 
Some media outlets are slowly but surely releasing some spicy details from Mary Trump's book. It depicts D. Trump as a troubled soul (no news there) brought about by a repressive upbringing. Is this the bombshell book that would ruin Trump's chances?

Trump's worldview forged by neglect and trauma at home, niece Mary Trump says in new book

A tell-all book by President Donald Trump's niece describes a family riven by a series of traumas, exacerbated by a daunting patriarch who "destroyed" Donald Trump by short-circuiting his "ability to develop and experience the entire spectrum of human emotion," according to a copy of the forthcoming memoir obtained by The Washington Post.

President Trump's view of the world was shaped by his desire during childhood to avoid his father's disapproval, according to the niece, Mary Trump, whose book is by turns a family history and a psychological analysis of her uncle.

Donald escaped his father's scorn and ridicule, Mary Trump wrote, because "his personality served his father's purpose. That's what sociopaths do: they co-opt others and use them toward their own ends — ruthlessly and efficiently, with no tolerance for dissent or resistance."

The president, Mary Trump wrote, is a product of his domineering father and was acutely aware of avoiding the scorn that he heaped on his older brother, called Freddy, Trump writes.

"By limiting Donald's access to his own feelings and rendering many of them unacceptable, Fred perverted his son's perception of the world and damaged his ability to live in it."

Mary Trump wrote that her grandfather's children routinely lied to him but for different reasons. For her father, "lying was defensive — not simply a way to circumvent his father's disapproval or to avoid punishment, as it was for the others, but a way to survive."

For her uncle Donald, however, "lying was primarily a mode of self-aggrandizement meant to convince other people he was better than he actually was," Trump writes.

"Fred [Sr.] hated it when his oldest son screwed up or failed to intuit what was required of him, but he hated it even more then, after being taken to task, Freddy [Fred Jr.] apologized. 'Sorry, Dad,'" Mary wrote of the way her grandfather treated her father, known as Freddy. Fred Sr. "would mock him. Fred wanted his oldest son to be a 'killer.'"

Donald, seven-and-a-half years younger than his brother, "had plenty of time to learn from watching Fred humiliate" his eldest son, Mary Trump wrote.

"The lesson he learned, at its simplest, was that it was wrong to be like Freddy: Fred didn't respect his oldest son, so neither would Donald."

Link: https://www.seattletimes.com/nation...ma-at-home-niece-mary-trump-says-in-new-book/

 
I am a sculptor and artist. Why is tearing down sculptures stupid? Most public sculptures in the west until modern abstract sculpture came about often depicted generals, leaders, kings the ruling elite. Some were murderers and tyrants whose image were put in bronze to reinforce their power and ideologies. Be it Stalin, Idi Amin, or Saddam Hussein or king Leopold I Belgium. His troops would put dynamite sticks into Africans asses when celebrating Bastille day. I understand the anger and compulsion to bring specific symbols down just like the confederate flag and generals who fought for maintaining the slave system. I find these symbols hurtful and threatening and I am not a descendant of slaves. Can you imagine being black and have to see those symbols on government buildings or other places in your everyday life especially in the south where they are popular?Check out Tulsa Oklahoma in 1921 if you get a chance, enlightening.

I fully support the movement for social justice for African Americans. Until their liberties and sanctity of life are recognized and respected and the terror that has been perpetuated against these people is stopped my country's soul and potential to heal will not happen.

Tried to stay out of this but hey... it's one of those days.

Nearly forgot...

You can bet your life savings that the fathers and mothers of the hearing regeneration movement are card carrying liberals. These nerdy scientists are not in your clown world, whatever that is. They are often typical "liberals " like Stephen Heller at Stanford or Liberman at Mass Eye and Ear. They defer to science, not to scripture. The scientists who will save us are very far from the likes of the Orange haired leader of the "free world" who rejects science and embraces race hate.

Get on your knees and suck the nut of the liberal scientific community that's going to usher in hearing regeneration and save your ass.

Having said all that, I sincerely hope your tinnitus and audiological issues improve, I know you are hurting.
You typed a lot so I am going to reply to all of it but I want to make one point for now.

I bet Jasterboff and others like him were liberals. I hope you find my point blatant and obvious. If you think doctors care about/for us, I have a bridge for sale, cheap.
 
There are always counter examples. Capitalism and free-societies have accelerated wealth production at rates never seen in the history of man-kind. When resources can be moved from basic needs to advanced science, we all benefit.
Far left societies eventually become bankrupt and deteriorate. Many urban cities in the USA have become slums or are dumps because of liberalism.
 
There is a conspiracy theory that he is running at the request of the Trump campaign to siphon votes based on the fact that Ivanka was in Wyoming (where he recently bought a ranch) when he announced his run and Kanye has financially benefited from the Trump family.

That's too circumstantial to be hard evidence but I can't figure out why else he suddenly wants to run this late in the cycle. Unless it's just a manic episode...
I get the rationale behind the theory. But at the end of the day Kayne West wants eyes on him.
Wait it out and at the end of this road if there isnt a new song/video/album/clothing to promote after all this I would be shocked. Thats all there is to him.
 
I get the rationale behind the theory. But at the end of the day Kayne West wants eyes on him.
Wait it out and at the end of this road if there isnt a new song/video/album/clothing to promote after all this I would be shocked. Thats all there is to him.
God, to think running for president could be the new trend in wealthy people vanity projects...
 
Far left societies eventually become bankrupt and deteriorate. Many urban cities in the USA have become slums or are dumps because of liberalism.
Have you been to rural America? "Dumps" could very much describe whole swaths of Appalachia. Try looking at the meth map of the US sometime, too.

To expound on this, the entire country is becoming more third world thanks to our third world type income structure where all the resources go to the top 1%. Yes our cities are becoming dumps but so are our small towns.

us-wealth-inequality-chart.jpg


Why are Scandinavian cities very much not slums or dumps? They are way more liberal than the US.
 
I get the rationale behind the theory. But at the end of the day Kayne West wants eyes on him.
Wait it out and at the end of this road if there isnt a new song/video/album/clothing to promote after all this I would be shocked. Thats all there is to him.

Both interesting theories. But what gets me is the fact that Kim K has co-signed it.

Love her or hate her, she's a smart woman, with none of Kanye's mental health issues -- would she really allow him to do something like this just for the drama/publicity/money? If he turns out to be a laughing stock (big possibility), it would really damage their 'brand' -- esp as she is currently positioning herself as a serious human rights lawyer. That family are all about image, and I feel like a crazy Trump-esque husband talking nonsense about how slavery is a choice is only going to damage that. The only narrative that makes sense is if she really believes he could become President -- not in 2020, but in 2024.
 
Both interesting theories. But what gets me is the fact that Kim K has co-signed it.

Love her or hate her, she's a smart woman, with none of Kanye's mental health issues -- would she really allow him to do something like this just for the drama/publicity/money? If he turns out to be a laughing stock (big possibility), it would really damage their 'brand' -- esp as she is currently positioning herself as a serious human rights lawyer. That family are all about image, and I feel like a crazy Trump-esque husband talking nonsense about how slavery is a choice is only going to damage that. The only narrative that makes sense is if she really believes he could become President -- not in 2020, but in 2024.
Could she at least help him fill out the paperwork then?

https://thehill.com/blogs/in-the-kn...te-false-or-fictitious-filings-for-kanye-west

The whole thing is so strange.
 
People are going to vote for Kayne just to "own the libs."

Not saying he's going to win, but he'd get some votes.
 
If you check out Twitter, and the personal accounts of a lot of the hearing and tinnitus researchers, you can tell you are totally correct and they are heavily skewed liberal.

It's not just the researchers, either. Check out a lot of the CEOs, CMOs etc of the associated biotechs personal Twitter accounts.
I grew up with epidemiologists and biostatisticians. Super smart, nerdy, good at maths and left wing politics (social politics).
It was the same for the founders of the Manhattan project and the folks who won World War 2. They were then pursued as marxists and communists for decades because of McCarthy and uninformed and uneducated far right in the US.
Is what it is.

Many of the scientists on the Manhattan project were Jews and were hounded and persecuted wrongly, to be Bolsheviks and Communist sympathizers. That's how we thanked our scientists. A lot of the folks involved from hearing regeneration are Jews, Indians and Asians. I do hope the government doesn't turn on these folks too. I know they are sending foreign students in mass home now. Is that not xenophobia. Many of these folks are from India and China pursuing PhDs and involved in medical research. How does exiling them benefit America financially or intellectually?
 

Log in or register to get the full forum benefits!

Register

Register on Tinnitus Talk for free!

Register Now