Pregnancy shouldn't be an exclusion criteria.Well I'm worried about not being suitable. I imagine people who are pregnant won't be eligible or people who wear pacemakers. But there might be more.
Pregnancy shouldn't be an exclusion criteria.Well I'm worried about not being suitable. I imagine people who are pregnant won't be eligible or people who wear pacemakers. But there might be more.
I'm sure after you've had the baby you'll be eligible Allan . Sorry, couldn't resist...Well I'm worried about not being suitable. I imagine people who are pregnant won't be eligible or people who wear pacemakers. But there might be more.
Yes, it did. I was wondering what habituation means for you. Even though I'm very well habituated, I get a lot of anxiety about tinnitus worsening, which causes a lot of suffering even though my volume doesn't change much and spikes always tend to fade. It seems it's similar for you as well, which confirms that I'm not uniquely weak or something. Thanks man.Cheers Hans. Hope that answers your questions.
The day when new tinnitus patients will be feeling mildly annoyed when they learn that it can take up to 12 weeks for their condition to be silenced and will come to this forum to whine about tolerating tinnitus for that long.Imagine if one day we can have a spike, roll our eyes and blow the dust off our tongue zappers like we're popping an aspirin
They've given a spread of patient responses which probably reflects the spectrum of results they got. @Clare B got total silence but she wasn't featured in a testimonial so there must be others who had good results too?I still can't get past those testimonials. Out of all of the "successful" results those are the best they could find?
Fair enough.It's not going to be that simple and it's certainly not going to be an instant relief. It takes months for neuroplastic changes to occur. Also, Neuromod isn't going to protect us from further damaging our synapses between our supporting cells and auditory nerves.
I wonder if heart conditions or migraine might be a problem I have bothPregnancy shouldn't be an exclusion criteria.
Do you actually read any of the threads? He's posted loads, on various threads about being on a trial for A DIFFERENT DEVICE.@kelpiemsp
Hi - so are you saying Lenire really helped you? Sorry for asking but I haven't seen many of your posts.
Also - do you know what the exclusion criteria will be for the released device?
When you tamper with nerve cells together with acoustic input - who knows what can happen?Didn't some people on the Neuromod trial have their tinnitus get worse as a result of using the device, and leave the trial?
I don't think that'll exclude you. Loud music along with ETD both contribute to hearing loss. As Ross O'Neill (The CEO) said they are in the train of thought that hearing loss is the cause of tinnitus - like choking a hose pipe and the water tries to get through as he puts it - that's what the brain is doing by trying to pick up the lost frequencies. Also, if you don't have a measurable hearing loss on an audiogram doesn't mean you don't have damaged hearing. I think you'd pass the criteria given the information in your posts XOh man that's a shame if that's the case. I have hearing loss and ETD, however, I attribute my tinnitus to loud music, but can't rule out that the hearing and ETD is also contributing to the tinnitus. I'd try anything at this rate, so I'm cautiously optimistic about it all x
It's a good point of concern that we all have. However it could be that Neuromod picked a variety as not to overpromise. If they picked all the ones that sure complete elimination of it - that would be misleading to the consumer and a overpromise. Ross O'Neill stated that there was people who said "it went away" but notice how he was careful not to use the word "some people were cured". They have to be responsible if they are going to be taken seriously by the tinnitus community.I still can't get past those testimonials. Out of all of the "successful" results those are the best they could find?
The results were seen within the first 6 weeks of treatment - that's the thing with this product. You don't have to wear it for ridiculous amount of hours a day over months and months for it to be effective (like Desyncra claimed of the ACRN product).It's not going to be that simple and it's certainly not going to be an instant relief. It takes months for neuroplastic changes to occur. Also, Neuromod isn't going to protect us from further damaging our synapses between our supporting cells and auditory nerves.
I can think of absolutely no reason why being pregnant or wearing a pacemaker would stop this product working for you. I think you have as much chance of this working for you Allan as everyone else - relax my friend, you are suffering but hold onto hope.Well I'm worried about not being suitable. I imagine people who are pregnant won't be eligible or people who wear pacemakers. But there might be more.
I second that about not having hope with tinnitus. I lost hope once and was in a mental hospital. Very dangerous but slowly the hope came back and I got better - even though the tinnitus stayed the same.I don't think it's a pipe dream to expect a cure for tinnitus at some point in human existence, unless the world is coming to an end imminently (which in fairness it might)!
And even if that day doesn't come - as Bill said once, hope is the last part of a human to die. I would hate to have this condition without it!
Like Allan, you are reading far too much into the negative aspects. If anything, bimodal stimulation increasing tinnitus should help prove that tinnitus can in fact be modulated. The majority improved - focus on that!Most?! Not all??
Now, I am seriously getting worried.
If you have comorbid hyperacusis with your tinnitus - the results are showing you have a better chance of responding. Sure, hyperacusis sucks but that is a reason to be hopeful that you are more likely to be a super responder. It won't help your hyperacusis, but you have a much better chance of it helping your tinnitus!Now I am once again worried if those of us with worse than mild hyperacusis cannot use Leniere
I find it completely bizarre that they used testimonials from people with extremely limited responses and yet didn't bother to use someone like Claire that appeared to have an extremely positive response to the treatment.They've given a spread of patient responses which probably reflects the spectrum of results they got. @Clare B got total silence but she wasn't featured in a testimonial so there must be others who had good results too?
Thank you for writing that. I'm back to being a little more hopeful than I was earlier! I need to do a bit more research on it xI don't think that'll exclude you. Loud music along with ETD both contribute to hearing loss. As Ross O'Neill (The CEO) said they are in the train of thought that hearing loss is the cause of tinnitus - like choking a hose pipe and the water tries to get through as he puts it - that's what the brain is doing by trying to pick up the lost frequencies. Also, if you don't have a measurable hearing loss on an audiogram doesn't mean you don't have damaged hearing. I think you'd pass the criteria given the information in your posts X
Yes, I agree.I find it completely bizarre that they used testimonials from people with extremely limited responses and yet didn't bother to use someone like Claire that appeared to have an extremely positive response to the treatment.
A few members I have spoken to suffer this way. They are habituated to their tinnitus, but scared it will get worse with time. I do, and I contribute it to an anxiety issue rather than a tinnitus issue. I think some anxiety is healthy. There was a member not long ago, who was adamant he wasn't going to stop going to raves and let the tinnitus stop him. There was a flood of messages how loud music can make it worse, but the anxious person would do the sensible thing and knock the raves on the head. You've caught the tinnitus early and recognised what it is and know how bad it can get - that anxiety has helped you protect and be careful going forward.Yes, it did. I was wondering what habituation means for you. Even though I'm very well habituated, I get a lot of anxiety about tinnitus worsening, which causes a lot of suffering even though my volume doesn't change much and spikes always tend to fade. It seems it's similar for you as well, which confirms that I'm not uniquely weak or something. Thanks man.
Here's to hoping for an excellent TENT-A1 paper.
If you look at the inclusion criteria, I think it was no more than >80 dB loss in the 2-8 kHz range and no more than >40 dB loss in the 0-1 kHz range.Does anyone know how much hearing you have to have to use the device?
:O THAT'S A LOT OF EXCLUSIONS.Hey, so quick question... is this the same thing (link below)? If so then the exclusion criteria is there... and I would have been rejected from the trial because of a few reasons...
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03530306
Neuromod and Susan Shore are different. I thought Susan Shore - if that's where you went - wanted people who had a somatic element to their tinnitus.Exclusions are for study design and really mean nothing to real world treatment. FWIW I had pretty severe TMJ.
So was the lightbulb and look how that turned out.To me it smacks of trial and error.
He was in the Minnesota trial.Neuromod and Susan Shore are different. I thought Susan Shore - if that's where you went - wanted people who had a somatic element to their tinnitus.
Unless you went to Minnesota.
They did have someone like Claire. The lady who said she didn't want to give back the device at the end and kept it a bit longer. I've forgotten her name. Ginger haired lady. She said her tinnitus went away. That's basically the same thing Claire said.I find it completely bizarre that they used testimonials from people with extremely limited responses and yet didn't bother to use someone like Claire that appeared to have an extremely positive response to the treatment.
'Thalidomide' - to counteract nausea during pregnancy...?So was the lightbulb and look how that turned out.
That's good then. So it means it may still work for me (potentially) even if I have a few points listed in the exclusion criteria? xExclusions are for study design and really mean nothing to real world treatment. FWIW I had pretty severe TMJ.
Good advice for all, but sorry to say that for the most part, it will be likely be ignored.Should that not read "If the day comes...?"
At this point in time there is no certainty, is there?
Not wishing to upset anybody here, by the way.
Just promoting caution.
This isn't going to work for 100% of people and it doesn't create "silence".The day when new tinnitus patients will be feeling mildly annoyed when they learn that it can take up to 12 weeks for their condition to be silenced and will come to this forum to whine about tolerating tinnitus for that long.