- Apr 15, 2017
- 1,419
- Tinnitus Since
- 2008
- Cause of Tinnitus
- Noise
So frequency doesn't matter? Getting me confused.
Not according to what he said my man.
So frequency doesn't matter? Getting me confused.
Yeah, they said that the frequency of your tinnitus doesn't matter. Which is nice for those of us with tinnitus outside the "normal" hearing range.So frequency doesn't matter? Getting me confused.
The only thing they measure is your hearing, so you get the clearest, best sound from the device. The tinnitus frequency, and tone, and all that doesn't matter. They are pinpointing the excessive neural activity. All the sound does is force your brain to activate the auditory cortex in a specific way, and the tongue stimulation helps drive the plasticity of that activity.So frequency doesn't matter? Getting me confused.
You have to factor in the context of what they're saying. That's where the confusion is because there's a disconnect between who they think this device can help (marketing-speak) and the filter criteria they've been using on test-subjects.Yeah, they said that the frequency of your tinnitus doesn't matter. Which is nice for those of us with tinnitus outside the "normal" hearing range.
That's certainly a reason to be optimistic. Hubert Lim's getting a pair of my knickers in the post if it works. Worn ones.Also, another thing that makes this device promising is who has joined Neuromod. Hubert Lim, Richard S. Tyler (big deal), Berthold Langguth, and Deborah Hall are all major players in this field (at least from what I gathered). ACRN, Neuromonics, and all of these other companies from before couldn't get any attention from the big tinnitus leaders. So this has to be good news right? What do you think @hans799?
From what I understand there is no established averages for frequencies above 8 kHz, so for example to know if you have hearing loss above 8 kHz you would need to test against yourself, simply having say 5 dB @16 kHz does not mean much if you don't have a baseline to compare it to from a previous audiogram you have taken.Yes, ok, but what about the sufferers whose tinnitus frequency is higher than 8 kHz? It's not suitable? I guess you're knocking a lot of patients out just because of this 'little' detail. That would be a bummer for me and for a lot of people! But I also seem to remember that on the interview they stated that it isn't an issue?! Am I wrong?
........Hubert Lim just quit and moved far far away where no postal service can ever find him.That's certainly a reason to be optimistic. Hubert Lim's getting a pair of my knickers in the post if it works. Worn ones.
Deborah Hall was part of ACRN (https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01893/full) but generally I think and hope you're right...Also, another thing that makes this device promising is who has joined Neuromod. Hubert Lim, Richard S. Tyler (big deal), Berthold Langguth, and Deborah Hall are all major players in this field (at least from what I gathered). ACRN, Neuromonics, and all of these other companies from before couldn't get any attention from the big tinnitus leaders. So this has to be good news right? What do you think @hans799?
Maybe. I suppose we'll just have to wait and see.You have to factor in the context of what they're saying. That's where the confusion is because there's a disconnect between who they think this device can help (marketing-speak) and the filter criteria they've been using on test-subjects.
IMHO, because of the MuteButton debacle, I think they went overboard on the filter criteria on the last trial. I also seriously doubt they even enforced it that strictly on that last trial as the vast majority of tinnitus sufferers have high frequency ringing above their cutoff whether they're able to identify those tones or not.
Sounds like he meant 12 weeks since that's how long the treatment lasts.Regarding the TENT-A2 study, how far is that along? When asked in the interview he said the results won't be with us for another 12 months??
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03530306Regarding the TENT-A2 study, how far is that along? When asked in the interview he said the results won't be with us for another 12 months??
I believe TENT-A is in peer review currently, and TENT-A2 is currently in the 12 month follow up (finishing probably in the fall I assume). Either way, it won't affect the launch date from my understanding.Didn't they tweet that they had submitted it for peer review? It's discussed further back in this thread or in the Q and A one.
Yeah that's how I understand it too. I'm hoping they're launching early 2019 because they have trust in their product, not for less... charitable reasons.I believe TENT-A is in peer review currently, and TENT-A2 is currently in the 12 month follow up (finishing probably in the fall I assume). Either way, it won't affect the launch date from my understanding.
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03530306Regarding the TENT-A2 study, how far is that along? When asked in the interview he said the results won't be with us for another 12 months??
I edited my post a few minutes after posting because I mixed it up with TENT-A1. TENT-A2 seems ongoing yes and it's the TENT-A1 that is in peer review.I believe TENT-A is in peer review currently, and TENT-A2 is currently in the 12 month follow up (finishing probably in the fall I assume). Either way, it won't affect the launch date from my understanding.
That is correct.https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03530306
I edited my post a few minutes after posting because I mixed it up with TENT-A1. TENT-A2 seems ongoing yes and it's the TENT-A1 that is in peer review.
I believe that's pretty normal for medical devices. In the EU you don't need to do a big nice clinical trial before using it on people. It's far too lax and many have campaigned for the rules to be tightened. However this is more relevant for medical devices that are implanted within the body because the potential for irreversible severe complications is higher. For a device like this in theory one might imagine the risks are not so high.That is correct.
If the release date comes before the peer review is published, who's going to buy it before then? Risky.
I believe @Paulmanlike referred to the financial risk. The device won't come cheap and we have already been ripped off enough times.For a device like this in theory one might imagine the risks are not so high.
Because a standard audiogram does not go beyond 8 kHz, possibly, if you have tinnitus you may probably have hearing loss not detectable in the standard audiogram test.There's one thing that's getting me confused.
Let's say I haven't got hearing loss but my tinnitus frequency is above 8 kHz (I'd say mine is between 11 - 12 kHz), does this mean i'm not eligible for treatment? I know you answered me but not sure if I understood completely.
It's a small company founded by Dr. Ross O'Neill that is commercialising work from Universities.So is Neuromod its own small startup company trying to treat tinnitus or is it part of a larger conglomeration of pharmaceutical products companies?
The former, but heavily VC backed from the sound of it.So is Neuromod its own small startup company trying to treat tinnitus or is it part of a larger conglomeration of pharmaceutical products companies?
Lol, you sure about that?The former, but heavily VC backed from the sound of it.
In the video they did with Steve they mentioned that their early funding came from a few rich benefactors with tinnitus, but that the funding required for their larger trials was much more extensive, and so some VC firm or other is involved.Lol, you sure about that?
Lol, what? I'll give you one more chance.In the video they did with Steve they mentioned that their early funding came from a few rich benefactors with tinnitus, but that the funding required for their larger trials was much more extensive, and so some VC firm or other is involved.
I wouldn't read much into that besides "VC firm thinks Neuromod has 1 in 20 chance of doing well", since the VC model is to lose money on 95% of things, but make so much money on the other 5% that it doesn't matter.
source: worked in VC backed company for 4 years before we got acquired by giant multinational.
I'm not sure what you're asking?Lol, what? I'll give you one more chance.