I've refrained from posting in this thread as it always causes unnecessary controversy, but my communications with Dr Shim a couple of months back just further convinced me that he hasn't got a clue and should most certainly be avoided.
This is all old news now, but I shared the work of Dr Shim with two consultants, one of whom is the clinical lead of his department (these guys present at medical conferences around the world) and they said that there's no doubt in their minds that Shim is full of shit based on the available evidence. One of them said that he sees stuff like this all the time and that it is not as uncommon as one would think. He said he sees "Dr Shims" all over the place, including the UK. He went on to tell me how many of his patients when desperate, would bring up a clinic they had found - somewhere in the world - run by Dr X. He said they all have the same telltale characteristics, namely, a semi-plausible and believable principle to a layman, that can be researched and believed based on some studies that are out there. However, he said that all this confirms is the persons susceptibility to the confirmation bias which these charlatans prey upon, because if you showed the same studies in the context they are proposed (for treating tinnitus and hearing loss) to a research scientist or Dr who specialises in that field, then that person would immediately be educated as to why they are wrong. Not to mention Dr Shim's total reluctance to publish a single paper, which is absurd. The fact he hides behind a patent as proof of a medical discovery is all one needs to know as this moment in time.
His price doubled after John went and when I pointed this out I was hounded and excuses were made on Dr Shim's behalf.
I attempted two conversations with Dr Shim. One where I was completely ignored for asking this very reasonable and sensible question:
View attachment 29578
Some weeks after this I started another conversation:
View attachment 29579
View attachment 29580
View attachment 29581
He is wrong about it being on the right side and that's quite a bold statement to make. Reversible he says, really? Why hasn't the rest of the world caught up then? (You know what they say, if it's too good to be true then it probably is).
View attachment 29585
View attachment 29586
View attachment 29587
View attachment 29588
As expected, some study that has nothing to do with him and gives absolutely no indication into whether his method works. Great!
View attachment 29589
View attachment 29590
View attachment 29591
Already done it? (Claims it was done in 2014) Then where the hell is it? If he had really completed a successful study that showed good results then why would any sane person refrain from publishing it? Ask yourselves this. He is so misleading that I don't even know where to begin. It's a total embarrassment and he wants $18,000!! (I love how the price just magically doubles when he can smell more cash coming his way).
View attachment 29592
View attachment 29593
View attachment 29594
Yea, thanks for being so helpful, Dr Shim! And off he went waiting for his next victim who may be a bit more gullible and desperate.