Thank you so much. I really appreciate that Artemis2k.
I think he is a genuine ENT as well, and perhaps like you said unorthodox.
Tnx very much.
I think he is a genuine ENT as well, and perhaps like you said unorthodox.
Tnx very much.
pretty sure the prp is from blood.Whether growth factor comes from stem cells or is separate I am not sure about, and I don't think matters.
Artemis, John Adams, Humptyy, anyone... please put the treatment in layman's terms, I have no scientific background. I am an artist, a builder, sculptor... first time coming across this info and it would benefit me and many others who lack the knowledge you have. Tnx.
have emailed with sthe clinic, and the told me about treatment more or less:
It depends on your age, the degree of hearing loss.
If your ages are under 50, you can feel improvement with 2weeks after our treatment.
There could be individual differences.
We use adult stem cells and growth factors.
The cost of treatment will be 6,000US dollars.
We offer 2 shots of treatment with that price.
Each shots should be done at least 1week apart.
So, its better to stay in Korea for that period.
What do you think? Is it a good idea to visit Korea or better to wait some time nd see how this technic improve?
I don't think that I have much factual information to contribute to the previous posts. As far as the quantity or derivation of the stem cells he uses, it is unknown. I just grazed through the patent to confirm, I don't believe he ever said that he uses Mesenchymal Stem Cells, I believe that was our assumption; and I think it is an accurate one. Perhaps he said so in a Skype call? Regardless, the below quote is the record I found of Shim stating he uses stem cells.
Yes, the PRP is extracted via blood, the patient's blood is put in a centrifuge and separated, then prepared for viscosity. As far as the stem cells, there are many sources for these. He could be extracting from the blood in a similar fashion to the PRP; but when stem cells are extracted from the blood, it is one of the least potent forms of SC. He could have donor stem cells, or he could be farming and harvesting population doublings in his own lab. Besides the physical source of the stem cells, as of right now I believe we can only speculate on the anatomical source as well. Like I wrote previously, it could be blood, could be umbilical cord, placenta, very doubtful it is embryonic, etcetera. This is something that we should inquire about unless someone knows this information and it has eluded me.
The following patent excerpt states how Shim determines quantity of treatment:
"The effective amount may be properly selected depending on a subject, and determined depending on the severity of disease, a patient's age, body weight, health conditions, gender, and drug sensitivity, administration time, administration route, excretion rate, treatment period, and drugs blended with or co-administered with the composition of the present invention, and other factors well known in the medical field."
In this thread there has been plenty mention of efficacy in the recent past. I think that it is important to realize that these treatments do work for some, it is more a question of if it will work for your specific and individual injury. ATEOS had a great experience with Mesenchymal Stem Cells, it seems that @EddieA has had a good one with PRP. Lyme unfortunately had an adipose SC procedure that amounted to absolutely nothing; no detriment, no progress. There are others I have spoken to throughout the forum who have undergone the same procedures as success stories', and have had no improvement. I think it is interesting that ATEOS had benefit with laser as well as SC, and it makes me consider that maybe those of us who have had some success with alternative treatment could have some more success with alternative treatment of a greater severity; however those of us who respond to nearly nothing, I think it is safe to wager that they would have no benefit from much of anything that isn't a cure produced by the mainstream industry. Regardless, we will continue to explore the possibilities of this; and if anyone hasn't seen, @EddieA's PRP treatment was only 900 USD; I'm sure that in the foreseeable future we will be in contact with someone who intends to undergo if not Shim, at least a practically positioned PRP clinic for intra-tympanic injections.
Oh yeah... Happy New Year. -_-
Your bone marrow, extracted using local anesthetics.derivation of the stem cells
Your bone marrow, extracted using local anesthetics.
@Aaron thatąs what Dr Shim claims he uses:
"We uses your own growth factors and stem cell extracted from your blood , bone marrow , or fat tissue"
I'm not sure where Mentos got this info; @Artemis2K, you are good at digging. Regardless, assuming it is accurate, I have no desire to have a needle in my bone, or a vaccuum in my belly to extract stem cells unless I am positive of efficacy. Blood I would definitely undergo, except for the fact that its potency is so poor.
I'm not sure why Shim isn't using donor cells; from what I understand, there are remarkably low chances of high potency allogenic umbillical MSCs being rejected and recognized as antigenic; and this hypothetical reaction should be nearly innocuous. I believe ATEOS had this happen while undergoing his IV in China, and his reaction resolved in a few days. This subject is definitely something to approach Shim about in the future. Perhaps he knows something that we don't, and he has found that it is necessary to utilize autologous cells? Perhaps utilizing umbilicals would increase the cost for patients so that his clinic would be less accessible? Perhaps he is trying to eliminate the minuscule possibilites of rejection by only utilizing autologous cells?
I'm not trying to be a downer or debate stem cell efficacy; my knowledge on the subject only comes from a couple of books which were intentionaly made accessible to the layman. I think that weaker blood derived stem cells combined with viscous PRP still has plenty of potential. Regardless, Shim seems to be very versatile. An ENT who extracts stem cells; if I'm not mistaken, an adipose extraction is called a "mini-surgery".
Good question. But this ain't a joke to laugh at. We have been discussing the treatment of what we know. I'm sure someone will go sooner than later.Soooo is anyone gonna go haha
I got this info from mail from Minbo Shim.I'm not sure where Mentos got this info; @Artemis2K, you are good at digging. Regardless, assuming it is accurate, I have no desire to have a needle in my bone, or a vaccuum in my belly to extract stem cells unless I am positive of efficacy. Blood I would definitely undergo, except for the fact that its potency is so poor.
Then don't.I'm not trying to be a downer or debate stem cell efficacy
I'm not sure what your intention is by quoting me in this post. Of course bone marrow is an adequate option in regard to stem cell, and has been known to have positive outcomes. You could quote any practitioner who advocates whatever cell of choice for different reasons.Then don't.
"Bone marrow MSCs have greater advantages for clinical use in human patients than other multipotential stem cells, such as embryonic stem cells because MSCs can be collected from the patient's own bone marrow for an autologous transplantation with little physical risk, no rejection risk, and few ethical problems. In the present transplantation, many MSCs were confirmed to have invaded the lateral wall and to have contributed to recovery of hearing loss despite transplantation between different rat strains. Therefore, we expect that autologous transplantation of bone marrow MSCs would be even more effective in treating hearing loss caused by injuries to the cochlear fibrocytes."
SOURCE:
Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation Accelerates Hearing Recovery through the Repair of Injured Cochlear Fibrocytes
View attachment 25377
American Journal of Pathology, The, 2007-07-01, Volume 171, Issue 1, Pages 214-226, Copyright © 2007 American Society for Investigative Pathology
Am I the only user on this site that has access to subscription based medical journals?
that's not just "any practitioner". that is peer reviewed article from the American Journal of Pathology.You could quote any practitioner who advocates whatever cell of choice for different reasons.
sorry I wasn't laughing. My only concern is my freq. of 10+khz, that's where my issues are and I'm not sure if this potentially helps with that. Otherwise I'd go.. Maybe i should speak with himGood question. But this ain't a joke to laugh at. We have been discussing the treatment of what we know. I'm sure someone will go sooner than later.
You can take the step to go if you have the funds and the passport.
You're one of the good guys and you get my good guy endorsement. @1000 is certainly a good guy as well. Trust me we are all on the same teeeeeeeeeeeeeam.sorry I wasn't laughing. My only concern is my freq. of 10+khz, that's where my issues are.
Thanks! I apreeeeeeeeciate itYou're one of the good guys and you get my good guy endorsement. @1000 is certainly a good guy as well. Trust me we are all on the same teeeeeeeeeeeeeam.
Could you explain Mentor, elaborate please. You had a discusssion with Shim?I got this info from mail from Minbo Shim.
Am I the only user on this site that has access to subscription based medical journals?