I've now posted multiple peer reviewed science papers stating that the use of growth factors and bone marrow stem cells can recover hearing loss. What is going on in this community? People are still posting sad stories of despair and declaring that there is no cure when there is. This should be big news, yet mostly silence. There is something really wrong here. What is the deal?
You are making some definitive statements about something that is only potential. The evidence that you have posted, while it is very intriguing, is mostly regarding animals, and possibly things done in vitro; not to mention the last study you posted was from 2007, which is barely even relevant to current stem cell research. You are diminishing the justification of people's suffering because you believe that you have found a "cure", while you haven't even yet utilized that "cure" for yourself.
As I have said in the past, there have been a handful of others who underwent ATEOS' umbilical regiments, (and those are only the ones that I have been made aware of, many people here only observe rather than post), and they had no improvement while ATEOS realized a 50 percent improvement of his tinnitus' condition. We have already seen that Shim's audiograms barely even change, and still you say "cure". You have said recently that there is very little risk involved with a bone marrow procedure, and you write off all possibilities of infection, the fact that elderly presbycusis sufferers are at some risk of malignancy when utilizing autologous cells via localized injections, or the possibility that an ENT could well be performing a bone marrow extraction himself, something very potentially out of his field.
I would like to restate that I am nearly an advocator for these treatment concepts, and they could be something that I would like to try myself; though I have received messages on Ttalk, regarding how some of my posts have influenced people's decisions, and I absolutely empathize with this because a handful of others here have influenced my own decisions, and therefore impacted my life. Like I have parenthetically mentioned earlier, there are many people who do not post, and only observe; and I think that JohnAdams is being highly irresponsible in writing such definitive statements which have potential to effect people's lives with at least some possibility of detriment.
I think it is best to stay grounded in reality, and it is my conjecture that if we were to hypothetically see improvement with this treatment, it would be incremental, and not be a "cure" unless the patient's ailment is mild.