Right.Basically, the principal still stands though, NT-3 restores the auditory nerve fibers, not the inner hair cells.
Right.Basically, the principal still stands though, NT-3 restores the auditory nerve fibers, not the inner hair cells.
Those don't seem to have the adequate applications with inner ear regeneration, but this is all speculative anyhow!I believe this to be relevant. Sounds like this could be what he is using. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3213779/
I'm going to try to email him occasionally, yes. However, I do not want to bother him too much. It could help if other people emailed him asking what exactly he used, where to find more information about him and his experience, proof authenticity of his clinic and doctorate (government or otherwise), and maybe more to go by.Those don't seem to have the adequate applications with inner ear regeneration, but this is all speculative anyhow!
Are you going to keep probing Dr. Shim, @Artemis2K?
Just thinking off the cuff...even if there is hair regeneration, will these hairs do the job, IE will they either stop the tinnitus or restore sound properly? We are born with the proper hairs and perhaps these new hairs will do nothing.
This is just a total random guess on my part based on no fact, only written to beware of new treatment or possible scammers. As bad as my tinnitus is, my hearing is actually fine, and I would hate to shell out 6K with the possibility of this treatment damaging my hearing or possibly making the tinnitus work.
Sorry to be very skeptical.
Based off his website, he has had posted results. I am looking at his Korean site now and he posts results just about every other day. Some of them are like 20+ decibel regain. http://m.blog.naver.com/medsem77?currentPage=3 You might have to use a Google Translate add-on to view this, the website viewer from Google Translate site seems to not work at the moment. I forget if Chrome does automatic translate option. I'm using my tablet.
As I said earlier, he has visited Stanford in Heller's lab for a week and has a lot of digital footprints dating back to like 2009. His clinic's location seems to be legitimate, and he seems to be an actual ENT. His YouTube channel has him in 2009 talking about medical stuff, I think mostly related to ENT. He's exposing himself a lot to where if he is a scammer he is putting himself in thin ice. South Korea does not tolerate scam artists.Also beware of those on internet forums and elsewhere who seem to "overly promote" a certain untested procedure.
Scammers love to go on website forums, with different IP addresses, different user names, etc, and pretend that they had this procedure done and it works great, etc, etc, etc.
This is your hearing and your life we're talking about here, and your money...so be skeptical at first, nothing wrong with that, and do some good investigation before risking your money and your health.
I'm not accusing anyone here of being a scammer. All I'm saying is beware that there are scammers out there. In my view, I'd rather be skeptical first, and thoroughly check things out, thoroughly investigate in every way possible, rather than be overly optimistic, and it winds up making things worse, possibly a lot worse.
Where did you see that he visited for a week?he has visited Stanford in Heller's lab for a week
Oh, sorry. I must have forgot to mention.Where did you see that he visited for a week?
I emailed Heller about it, and he did reply. He said that Shim did visit Stanford for about a week.
I also emailed Megan Ealy, and she replied that he was there due to interest of using stem cells as hearing loss treatment.
Sorry for forgetting to mention that, I should have sooner.
A little odd that you didn't mention any of that since you were so focused on someone at Stanford "validating" this clinic. You still seem to be searching for information about his background, credentials, etc. Did they "validate" him and his clinic or not?
According to this earlier post https://www.tinnitustalk.com/threads/inner-ear-hair-cell-regeneration-—-maybe-we-can-know-more.3131/page-70#post-217077 the "growth factors" are derived from blood or bone marrow. Assuming this information is correct, he is not using NT-3 or BDNF.
I just mailed dr Shim asking him about details what kind of groty factors he uses an some scientific background behind. His reply was very blunt, he says he does not discuss his methods so deeply with his patients and if I want to be his patient I need to trust him. Otherwise I should find help somehere else not at his clinic... On one hand I didn't like his blunt reply, on other hand it looks like he is not desperate to convince patients to his methods, if someone does not trust him should give it up
It seems this guy has been getting a lot of email requests these last couple of days. His replies to my emails were also very blunt. He didn't seem desperate at all and wouldn't even respond to my questions. Very similar to what you wrote.
I just mailed dr Shim asking him about details what kind of groty factors he uses an some scientific background behind. His reply was very blunt, he says he does not discuss his methods so deeply with his patients and if I want to be his patient I need to trust him. Otherwise I should find help somehere else not at his clinic... On one hand I didn't like his blunt reply, on other hand it looks like he is not desperate to convince patients to his methods, if someone does not trust him should give it up
It's good to hold some reservation. But the fact we're even talking about these stem cell clinics is amazing. 8 years ago when I got this horrible condition, potential treatment was just a pipe dream. The best part is that stem cell clinics are trying to heal other ailments as well and the knowledge is applicable to what we're trying to accomplish.
I agree. I'd like to hear more about this stem cell research. If it works then fantastic, if it doesn't work then try something else. But we can never quit trying.
In any event, in my opinion, I am 100% convinced the solution for us, is not with this Dr Shim.
I just wonder if there is a possibility to "close the door" for future treatments. There is not yet enough knowledge about the inner ear to predict what happens if (an) unknown growth factor(s) is(are) injected in the middle ear. (Or stem cells) .How many growth factors are available at the moment that could have an effect on inner ear regeneration? Growth factors can be so many things. And the gerbils? There won't be any long term data. Not yet anyway.If stem cells will do the trick then why not.
I am starting to think it is a very high risk treatment. Especially long term.
Agreed this is high risk which is why I don't think anyone should try this unless they have nothing left to lose. Even with my little hearing, I manage to get by between that and reading lips. I am in pretty bad shape and I don't see this as an option for me right now, but when they tell me that cochlear implants are the only option left, then yes this does seem like an alternative.
Really long term, your hearing probably starts degrading again as you continue to age. Even if it buys you 5 years of better hearing, they could have something better by then.
I asked Minbo Shim about the injection. I was skeptical that I would be able to leave by flight for a while due to the eardrum puncture, but he said I could leave very next day. I don't know about the science of this, so I cannot say. I have also read that perforations heal at most within a few months, and this would be an injection so I would assume the needle would be small enough to where healing process was swift in that regard.Hearing does not deteriorate as we age, we just damage it on daily basis.
Before all this hearing restoration research stuff really kicked in, all thought that you could lose hearing only because of disease or "just getting older". Now it has been determined that because of constant noise exposure over
normal" levels (i.e. driving car with open window (closest to your ear), working at factory, etc) is what kills hearing.
All i know is that if this injection is PRP-like, then risk is minimal (except incision itself). Never hear of complications from PRP injections ever. It either works as intended or "not as good", that is it.
I have also read that perforations heal at most within a few months, and this would be an injection so I would assume the needle would be small enough to where healing process was swift in that regard.
That is wicked cool.For the injection, they put a camera in my ear and projected it on a large TV screen, so I was able to see the needle going into the eardrum in large projection full color. Quite a show.