This thread and its predecessor were always emotional rollercoasters. The mood has been alternating between euphoria, skepticism and doom every few days for at least a year. @kelpiemsp posted that his tinnitus went away? We're saved! Study result release delayed? Neuromod is a scam! Someone read a negative Facebook comment on MuteButton from 2014? This crap will never work! And so on.Or... It could be less about them and more about the trough of disillusionment stage of the hype cycle, which I knew was gonna come.
View attachment 31495
There are 2 options here:
Either it is the lack of confidence in their product, or horrible public relations skills.
I hope it is the latter of the two.
Impatient is not the right word here.Option 3 - we are all just REALLY impatient.
Maybe we need to wait until the early adopters are 4 weeks+ in to their treatment?Sufferers just need a "I started the treatment four weeks ago and my tinnitus is getting a lot better!" post.
Agreed. I think the 6 week mark for the users will be very interesting news.Sufferers just need a "I started the treatment four weeks ago and my tinnitus is getting a lot better!" post.
I understand, but reading about worsenings is discouragingMaybe we need to wait until the early adopters are 4 weeks+ in to their treatment?
Or what if their target demographic is people that will react the best to the placebo effect as well as people that will spontaneously recover?Coming at this from a different perspective, consider the possibility that Neuromod may have launched this before they were ready to, in response to consumer demand. They don't have any additional clinics on-stream yet, haven't managed to get the latest trial report through the peer-review yet and haven't ironed out the initial UAT issues yet. Weighed against those negatives, they had a potential customer base - effectively this website - throughout the first half of 2019 screaming for the device to be released NOW!!!!!
They're damned if they do and damned if they don't.
If they don't release the device and put off the launch date until they're ready, everyone's screaming at them 'I can't wait that long!!!!' - so they launch from a sub optimal position and now people are screaming at them 'you're amateurs!!!'
All of this could be easily avoided by providing some updates instead of radio silence. Don't get me wrong, I got what you meant and I think I agree with it, but those changes in mood, pessimism and every emotional change that can be seen in this thread are closely related to lack of communication from their side.Coming at this from a different perspective, consider the possibility that Neuromod may have launched this before they were ready to, in response to consumer demand. They don't have any additional clinics on-stream yet, haven't managed to get the latest trial report through the peer-review yet and haven't ironed out the initial UAT issues yet. Weighed against those negatives, they had a potential customer base - effectively this website - throughout the first half of 2019 screaming for the device to be released NOW!!!!!
They're damned if they do and damned if they don't.
If they don't release the device and put off the launch date until they're ready, everyone's screaming at them 'I can't wait that long!!!!' - so they launch from a sub optimal position and now people are screaming at them 'you're amateurs!!!'
Which in itself, I feel, should be reason enough for proper treatments to be developed ASAP.We are difficult patients. We have been cheated (and, more broadly, mistreated) so often that we no longer trust anyone.
There will be data when it gets past peer review and it's published in a scientific journal.I believe in science, and right now there is data from them showing reductions in the THI scale.
Bottom line, I believe this is a small company that can't handle so much stuff, but they have invested time in a device which is likely to be effective as shown in their studies.
In fairness they aren't going to give you the full technical explanation in their marketing / on their website as that would just confuse the average patient.
Well no it doesn't, but then, it's not a piece of scientific literature being submitted for peer review.Does this read like science to you.......?
It is very vague. There are many biochemical processes involved that they don't explain. It's like saying,
I'd love to know your theory of how to identify this nefarious 'target demographic'.Or what if their target demographic is people that will react the best to the placebo effect as well as people that will spontaneously recover?
Which is honestly a fine explanation. IF you're explaining how a car works to someone who's never seen or heard of a car.It is very vague. There are many biochemical processes involved that they don't explain. It's like saying,
"Here is how a car works:
1. You put gas in it.
2. You step on the accelerator.
3. Car go vroom vroom."
Which is why there's a difference between marketing-speak and technical jargon.There are many biochemical processes involved that they don't explain.
There have been multiple users by now reporting first positive effects (one on this very page), but their comments tend to get ignored or met with, "but you haven't had tinnitus long enough!", or, "that's coincidence!"I understand, but reading about worsenings is discouraging
Yeah explanations are too complex for us stupid sheep.Sorry are we expecting them to add biochemical processes onto their website?
And are we expecting them to assume people will even understand that if they did?