No I'm definitely not saying that cancer and tinnitus are the same thing. I'm just asking, imploring you to imagine how much further behind in cancer research we'd be if scientists focused solely on cognitive behavioral therapy and not chemotherapy, etc. Can't you use the least bit of deductive reasoning to understand this is what I mean when I compare the two in terms of research? It's frustrating for any condition to fall victim to the endless CBT research money making machine, like chronic fatigue syndrome, tinnitus, VSS, etc. It's time for organizations like the ATA to start giving grants to better research into the mechanisms and cures for tinnitus.Cancer and tinnitus are not the same thing. I have previously told you I have nothing against tinnitus research. Those that want to embrace it they are welcome to do so. I am to referring to noise induced tinnitus with or without the presence of hyperacusis, which is different from tinnitus caused by an underlying medical condition. Tinnitus caused by an underlying medical condition within the auditory system or elsewhere in the body, needs to be researched, and can be treated my a physician. Noise induced tinnitus is a completely different kettle of fish. Doctors do not treat It.
This comes under Audiology and the patient should see either an Audiologist/Hearing Therapist that specialise in tinnitus and hyperacusis treatment.
Michael
We rely on the forward thinkers to advance society and technology. Imagine if in the 1400s we said, "bloodletting is good enough, I don't get why people want more." Or if we hadn't sailed the seven seas and realized the Earth wasn't flat... right? :^)