No. One reported muscle tremors at 600 mg.Anything interesting on that forum re: long term side effects?
Some people are trying to take legal action for being given this against there will.
Thanks the lord for that. I have 3 doctor friends two of which are GPs and one is a consultant anaesthetist (he knows a bit about drugs) that has read this and said it is just down right stupid.I'm not endorsing anything. Indeed, I said I myself would not sign the petition.
Moreover I do not believe a retigabine study will ever be done regardless of how many names appear on the petition. Given the side-effect profile of the drug at the doses needed to possibly mitigate tinnitus, there's not an IRB (Institutional Review Board) in the country that would approve.
Dr. Stephen Nagler
As yes @locoyeti I do but I would not tell you how I know on a open forum.
Oh well it is your own health you are messing about with. 9 years in medical School and 15 years in practice and has put 10s of thousands of people to sleep and had not lost one yet I know who I will trust. I am not commenting on this again.i call bullshit. i don't think you really have a solid understanding of this drug or its effect on a molecular level, and i doubt your doctor friends do either. who on earth has to take any drug against their will. ridiculous. really, the scaremongering of late has been disappointing, mostly because it is ill-informed.
i read about 40 related science papers (some of them multiple times). i read Kandel's graduate level neuroscience textbook to get a solid understanding of the underlying science. i didn't take my decision to take retigabine lightly, i wanted to know as much about Kv7 channels and retigabine as possible. i was prescribed lorazepam (a benzo), a month or so into my tinnitus by my GP, who said it would help with my sleep and anxiety. i looked into it and decided that it was not a good idea in the long term to take it, and instead relied heavily on the emotional support of my family, and other creature comforts. i don't want to go blind from retigabine, and i don't want to become a zombie, but the risks seem rather minimal on a short course of this drug (3 - 4 months). i think taking retigabine for over a year would be a different story.
i've said my peace... let the scaremongering freak-out fest continue.
I have make 3 attempt with retigabine and i'm sure that in my case, the sudden kidney and bladder problems, are related to this promising drug. I had to stop it. I hope that soon we may have a drug that is not so dangerous to health. I am deeply sorry for my failure but I could not continue.
I have make 3 attempt with retigabine and i'm sure that in my case, the sudden kidney and bladder problems, are related to this promising drug. I had to stop it. I hope that soon we may have a drug that is not so dangerous to health. I am deeply sorry for my failure but I could not continue.
A clarification. My kidney stones are not due to the use of Trobalt but they were already there! The doctor has advised me not to continue treatment because the drug can exacerbate this situation. Thanks to all
Yes I will clear. During the first attempt i have a pre existing problem of little kidney stones. The hypothesis was that the trobalt could give it in evidence. Solved the problem to the kidneys with alfalitic drug and drinking lots of water ,I was subjected to a second ultrasound control and the problem was solved. Then restart the trobalt and after 10 days i have painful urination 8and frequent urination). During the clinical visit, there was an evidence of enlarged prostate benigne with slight inflammation. I had stop the trobalt to verify if the condition return to his normal function. After only 2 days without trobalt the condition disappeared. Then after other 7 days i restart for the third time with trobalt.... the same results after dosage increasing, then i (and doctors) was sure that the condition was related to the retigabine treatment. Unfortunally...@Viking back in august you said this:
Retigabine (Trobalt, Potiga) — General Discussion
can you clarify this? it seems to me that you had kidney issues well before the drug. did trobalt exacerbate what kidney problems you already had, or did it create new symptoms?
any effects on T yet ?
I want a cure as much as the rest of you, and have taken some very silly things in the past. I could if I wish get a prescription for this today. But I wont. This is a VERY dangerous drug the long term danger to your health and the side effects can be dreadful. I have 3 Dr friends who have told me this. Some people are trying to take legal action for being given this against there will. My advice is DO NOT TRY IT. T is bad enough,but this can really screw you up BIG time.
Thank you for giving us the full picture, Viking. Can we say that in your experience, once you stopped the drug, the side effects went away? I see you say the normal function returned. Do you have any reason to believe there was lasting damage?Yes I will clear. During the first attempt i have a pre existing problem of little kidney stones. The hypothesis was that the trobalt could give it in evidence. Solved the problem to the kidneys with alfalitic drug and drinking lots of water ,I was subjected to a second ultrasound control and the problem was solved. Then restart the trobalt and after 10 days i have painful urination 8and frequent urination). During the clinical visit, there was an evidence of enlarged prostate benigne with slight inflammation. I had stop the trobalt to verify if the condition return to his normal function. After only 2 days without trobalt the condition disappeared. Then after other 7 days i restart for the third time with trobalt.... the same results after dosage increasing, then i (and doctors) was sure that the condition was related to the retigabine treatment. Unfortunally...
Hope to be clear and useful
Best wishes
NGC891 said:I feel better concentration.
Dear Friend;Thank you for giving us the full picture, Viking. Can we say that in your experience, once you stopped the drug, the side effects went away? I see you say the normal function returned. Do you have any reason to believe there was lasting damage?
My plan right now is to propose a urine albumen test to my doctor who I am going to ask for Potiga on Tuesday. Any idea how often one would have to repeat the test to catch a kidney problem before it became severe, like in Ricardo's case?
And on another topic entirely, from the User Experience thread.
@Danny Boy
So happy for you, it's so encouraging that it had such an effect on you even on a relatively small dose.
Maybe it's got to do with chronicity of tinnitus, the earlier the better!
Thanks again for that thorough explanation. Ricardo suffered renal failure, with subsequent recovery of kidney function after stopping Retigabine. He is hoping for a full recovery but it's too early to say if that will happen. I agree on the retinal pigmentation changes. This seems to be confined to long-term users, though GSK said in their warning that they can't be sure when it sets in. On the other hand, they are also not sure it causes vision problems.What happened to ricardo?
one last thing: about retinal pigmentation, I have been told that this happened only after years and years of therapy with high doses (1200mg / day) and in patients with other problems such as diabetes or liver problems synthesis compromise by the concomitant use of others anti-epileptic drugs.
keep me updated!
I will follow this plan if I get a prescription. Thank you again, Ivan! Anyone on the drug, please consider doing the same.according with my urologist to check the kidney every 20 or 30 days to monitoring the correct functions
Dear Friend;
the kidney and bladder problems was solved with stopping the medication. It was not permanent. Disappear in 2 days or max 1 week. performing a urine test, the only value "altered" was their high acidity and dark color.
Before the second attempt i was according with my urologist to check the kidney every 20 or 30 days to monitoring the correct functions.
Others minimal side effects were: Dry mouth, want to water (thirst), slight anxiety, slight confusion. 100mg/die
I later found that these effects tended to disappear with increasing dosage 100x2
At 100x3 I began to feel the positive effects on the calm of tinnitus and disappeared headaches (probably related to the tinnitus stress).
At 100 + 200 +100 i have the most important (in my little experience) clinical effect on tinnitus. Right side full free. Left side was moderated. But on this dosage i have an important side effect (negative) the duration of a couple of hours: i was in a state of stupor. Example: i was driving in my city I had the impression of not being fully attentive. I was too relaxed. Drive slow , reflexes were slowed but i was not in "panic". Totally anxiety free. A strange condition. This happened after the dose of 200mg to lunch with a full stomach. With the 3rd dosage of 100 at dinner there wasn't those effect but only more more drowsiness and slight blurried vision on long distances during the night.
I would like to say more but I could not continue the therapy. In any case, most doctors I consulted on the topic, and the problems related to the eye, kidneys, bladder are not irreversible, considering the low dosage.
What happened to ricardo?
one last thing: about retinal pigmentation, I have been told that this happened only after years and years of therapy with high doses (1200mg / day) and in patients with other problems such as diabetes or liver problems synthesis compromise by the concomitant use of others anti-epileptic drugs.
keep me updated!
Ivan