Xenon Pharmaceuticals' XEN1101 — Kv7 Potassium Channel Modulator

[BB23]

I'm not going to dispute anything you've said, except for your last sentence.

I'm not convinced that the effects of excitotoxicity are always irreversible.

It might be true for the inner ear, spinal cord, and other organs, but I believe our most precious organ, the brain, has the ability to heal and regenerate from such damage. This resilience is essential for survival.

Take benzodiazepine withdrawal, for instance. I think you'll agree that it's one of the ultimate ways to expose the brain to excitotoxicity. During withdrawal, the brain is flooded with glutamate, and many people become convinced they've sustained brain damage. Even doctors often misdiagnose these individuals with conditions like Parkinson's, MS, ALS, Alzheimer's disease, or other neurodegenerative disorders. And, of course, let's not forget tinnitus.

But guess what? Most people heal completely. Was it merely neuronal excitability and not toxicity? Or did the brain recover from the toxicity?

Additionally, the fact that many symptoms stemming from excitotoxicity can be alleviated with medications that reduce glutamate activity or antagonize NMDA and AMPA receptors supports my belief.

It's not a black-and-white matter. Perhaps describing excitotoxicity as a dysfunction isn't entirely inaccurate.

I made a small mistake earlier when I said Henry Abraham studied visual snow. In reality, he studied HPPD (Hallucinogen Persisting Perception Disorder). However, these conditions are fundamentally similar. In some of his interviews, he even refers to HPPD as visual snow, so I do not think it is a big deal. I have HPPD and have read enough to realize they are mostly the same thing. The key difference is that HPPD involves hallucinations and the warping of objects, but the rest of the pathologies seen in visual snow syndrome also apply to it, especially if it is Type 2.

Now, back to what you said:

You do not heal from this in the way you heal from a physical cut. Instead, your central nervous system essentially rearranges itself and forms new connections. It is almost like growing a new brain, so to speak.

Even if you regain functionality, your brain will be structurally different than it was before the injury, and you will not return to the exact same state as before. In terms of recovery, you might heal 85 to 90 percent, but the remaining 10 percent of damage typically does not affect your daily life and you do not even notice it. This process is called neuroplasticity.

A similar process happens with people who sustain traumatic brain injuries and lose functionality, like the ability to walk. With enough practice, they may "heal" and regain their ability to walk, but their brain remains structurally changed forever.

Experts say brain rewiring takes about two years and slows down significantly after that. However, based on what I have read, it does not stop entirely. It just continues at a slower pace throughout your life. This is somewhat similar to the recovery timeframe for tinnitus, where the first two years are critical for improvement.

One other thing:

I think too much trust is placed in certain drugs. Tolerance is essentially a form of brain damage. Receptors are destroyed, and even if they grow back, they may not regrow in the same positions or at the same density.

Any drug that crosses the blood-brain barrier has the potential to become neurotoxic over time. I have read thousands of accounts from people who were initially helped by these drugs, only to be harmed by them later. I am one of them. I developed tolerance to mirtazapine very quickly, and it turned on me fast.

For example, let us say a drug like XEN1101 works but needs to be taken for life. After a few years, we might see many people experiencing serious, life-threatening side effects from long-term use.

From what I recall, if someone experiences an excitotoxic event, there is a limited timeframe to act and mitigate the damage. The drugs you mentioned might be helpful during that window. But once the cell destruction has occurred, I assume those drugs would need to be taken for life. This suggests that the brain can no longer function properly without them, as the damage is already done.

Anyways...

 

[AnthonyMcDonald]

Oh, really?

I do not mean any ill will, but I will be straightforward in my response. We all need a wake up call. Many of us are living in denial because of claims that tinnitus can be cured with a simple drug.

Do you even know what excitotoxicity means?

I used to spend a lot of time on TinnitusTalk over the past two years. I realized that the vast number of research papers shared here amount to very little in practical terms. How many of us have actually been cured of this condition? Maybe one or two people out of millions?

That realization pushed me to broaden my research and explore other avenues. I will share more about this in a separate post on the suicidal thread soon.

For now, here is a simple definition from a quick Google search:

I also looked up what excitotoxicity does to the brain on YouTube, and I suggest you do the same.

The reality is that there are dead cells in your brain. Some areas are damaged, and the brain does not heal from this kind of damage. Instead, surrounding areas compensate for the lost function. Brain plasticity plays a role in this.

Of course, this might not apply to everyone with tinnitus. But since you mentioned excitotoxicity yourself, it cannot simply be reduced to KCNQ2/3 dysfunction. The research you are referring to only indicated that these channels were involved in the induction of tinnitus, not its chronic form.

Additionally, I need to point out that visual snow and tinnitus appear to share a similar pathology. Henry Abraham, who researched visual snow for 50 years, theorized that dead GABAergic inhibitory interneurons were responsible for the condition.

This highlights another issue: we still do not know the exact mechanisms causing tinnitus, and the cause may vary from person to person.

Stopping tinnitus will not be as simple as some people think—at least not for some of us. Until these drugs are released and proven to cure tinnitus for everyone, the research being discussed amounts to very little.

This board is living in denial.

I do not disagree with you that dead neurons do not come back to life.

What I don't understand is why you are saying dead neurons are the cause of tinnitus and related conditions. Explain to me how a phantom percept of sound is supposed to processed by any neuron in the brain if they're dead? They can't, they're dead. Lol.

 

[BB23]

I do not disagree with you that dead neurons do not come back to life.

What I don't understand is why you are saying dead neurons are the cause of tinnitus and related conditions. Explain to me how a phantom percept of sound is supposed to processed by any neuron in the brain if they're dead? They can't, they're dead. Lol.

Not if the loss involves GABAergic inhibitory interneurons or other types of inhibitory neurons.

With just a simple Google search, I found that other scientists suspect this as well:

Discovery of a New Type of Neuron Holds Clues About Tinnitus — Hearing Health Foundation

Recent studies implicated hyperactivity in the ventral cochlear nucleus (VCN) as a possible source of tinnitus generation. The VCN is one of the first brain structures to receive auditory information from the ears, and electrical activity in the VCN leads to activity in higher auditory centers.

hearinghealthfoundation.org

The disruption of inhibitory neurons could underlie the hyperexcitability of neurons.

Something inside is either dead or damaged for most of us. This could include hair cells, synapses, auditory nerve cells, or inhibitory neurons, all of which may be either dead or damaged.

It's clear that you prefer not to refer to this as brain damage, but it is still a form of damage.

Drugs will only suppress the symptoms because the original wiring is either gone or broken, leading to maladaptive plasticity.

 

[AnthonyMcDonald]

Not if the loss involves GABAergic inhibitory interneurons or other types of inhibitory neurons.

With just a simple Google search, I found that other scientists suspect this as well:

Discovery of a New Type of Neuron Holds Clues About Tinnitus — Hearing Health Foundation

Recent studies implicated hyperactivity in the ventral cochlear nucleus (VCN) as a possible source of tinnitus generation. The VCN is one of the first brain structures to receive auditory information from the ears, and electrical activity in the VCN leads to activity in higher auditory centers.

hearinghealthfoundation.org

Something inside is either dead or damaged for most of us. This could include hair cells, synapses, auditory nerve cells, or inhibitory neurons, all of which may be either dead or damaged.

It's clear that you prefer not to refer to this as brain damage, but it is still a form of damage.

Drugs will only suppress the symptoms because the original wiring is either gone or broken, leading to maladaptive plasticity.

Screw all people who got full suppression from bimodal stimulation. I guess they're all lying because they had brain damage lol.

 

[BB23]

Screw all people who got full suppression from bimodal stimulation. I guess they're all lying because they had brain damage lol.

Screw all these people who healed on their own as well! They are the real liars!

 

[Cmspgran]

Isn't this the whole premise of bimodal stimulation? The neurons in the DCN have become hyperactive, possibly for one of the reasons you mentioned, @BB23, or for other reasons. Regardless, the treatment works by bringing those neurons back to a non-excitable state through hessian spike timing. This shows that, regardless of the initial damage, there is a way to reverse the resulting symptoms.

 

[UKBloke]

I still strongly believe that the root cause of tinnitus lies in a defective (for the most part, congenital) neural-noise gating mechanism. It's the only conclusion I've ever been able to reach, other than "bad-luck", which is not very scientific, that explains why some people get tinnitus whilst others don't.

With that said, I still think there's an interesting discussion to be had about the role "brain damage" might play because there's no reason at all that dysfunction at the neural-gating level couldn't involve some kind of physical damage.

In and of itself, we know brain damage can happen on many different levels with vastly different outcomes, from life-threatening to literally carrying on as normal without ever knowing. A couple of years ago, someone close to me underwent an MRI on the brain, and unrelated to the reason for the original scan, I was informed there was evidence of some historical damage nothing to worry about; probably related to a viral infection many years ago.

There's a relatively new member here who hit his head doing some DIY and has suffered tinnitus ever since. If memory serves me right, @Steve, also from this forum, had his tinnitus begin after a blow to the side of the head from an RSJ. There's also the curious case (I can't find the original clinical report) of a chap who'd suffered tinnitus for decades, only to have it fully resolve after suffering a stroke. All three of these cases would suggest that some type of damage has a role.

The cause, congenital or "damage," still adds up to the same thing in my book: the neural-noise gating system is dysfunctional. If science can fix that gate, it will permanently shut out tinnitus, in my view.