@SoulStation... and anyone, regarding this kidney function thing. Let's just step back a minute here and think about this.
There are some very good points being made above, about effects of any number of drugs on kidney function. The list is huge, (just Google it and you will see some "household names" in there - antibiotics, blood pressure meds, NSAIDs, etc.) so the desired thing has always been IMHO to have as few other drugs/meds as possible while "trialing" Retigabine. It just helps to keep the confusion level down.
Also, if something as "vital" as kidney function were going to get hammered big time by Trobalt, then it is surprising that it did not have such a big bang in the GSK acceptance trials. Plus, after the fact, it's the "Halloween Highlights" of blue lips and retinal changes that really came out of the bag. Not renal failure.
For sure, it is essential to know that one has good liver function and kidney function
before trying Retigabine, as they are specifically addressed in the standard warning label...like a lot of drugs do. I have had so many standard blood panels and so forth over the 'mystery years' that I know quite well that my liver and kidneys are in fine shape, so did not bother. Anyone else though, who has been lucky enough to avoid lots of 'needle jabbing' blood draws over the years should probably do a standard automated blood chemistry panel, liver panel, kidney function, etc. just for the hell of it anyhow. They are pretty cheap even without insurance.
SoulStation. It would be good for you to ask your doc for your past results as a 'history' of BUN and Creatinine would be useful to compare to. Maybe you have been skirting on the edge of "high" for years an never knew it. (I keep all my test results just for this reason).
Anyway, as I was in the Emergency Room a few weeks back it only took a few moments for the usual "WTF???? on the part of the doc trying to figure out what was going on, so of course he ordered the default full Kahuna blood workup. I decided to get copies of my results from medical records yesterday and see what my BUN, Creatinine, and B/C Ratio were, then compared the current levels to prior tests from previous years...Interesting.
My Creatinine levels have been about the same 'for ever' hardly ever varying from around 1.0...My BUN levels have been all over the place: 10, 20, 14, 9, 13, etc. and thus most of my "ratios" hitting the
L = Low level marker.
The other thing to note, if your lab uses the same reference ranges, (
and they have changed on some tests over time so good to check that too!), the 'normal range' on mine is 15 - 24 for the Bun/Creatinine Ratio.
Thus if your levels are just 1.7 points above that and giving the
H reading...to me that is not as panic inducing as something way higher. I am NOT saying just kiss it off, but to me good reason to see what the past has showed and figure out if there has been a trend here, or a 'spike' c/o the Potiga.
Seeing as the BUN and Creatinine are measuring different things re liver and well, blood metabolism loosely speaking, I would consider a GFR to probably be a better test of function. Urine Albumin too.
But I'm not a doctor! If you want some peace of mind those are just suggestions.
Lastly....and this is "loose talk" OK, but is truly my experience. Over the years of all these darn blood panels I have had, for all kinds of stuff trying to find some clues to 'the mystery', I can't tell you how many times I have seen those little
L and
H readings next to some of the items in the lists of results. I of course point this out to the doc whoever, and the answer almost invariably is: "Oh it's nothing"...or: "These tests don't always say that much really"...or: "There are minor variations in lab error all the time"...etc.
Uummmmmmmmmm???...My best friend who is an ER doc kinda summed it up when he implied that he only starts jumping up and lighting matches when there are
really abnormal readings, or there are
patterns of supportive readings implying 'problems'. Otherwise he kind of shines them off.
After years of tests and indeed no 'answers' anyway,
in my case, I pretty much quit doing tests. Just like when I was in agriculture for decades I gave up doing soil tests. They never showed me a darn thing really that I couldn't see better by just digging a hole in the ground and asking about the land's history.
SS, I would suggest looking at you 'results history' before jumping to too many conclusions. Though not in any way saying dropping Potiga is
not a good idea for you. I think it is due to your concerns.
All the best... Zimichael