nothing has been proven
@nills. sorry it didn't help you but it has helped other people on this forum (including me).
what i don't get is why people want to generalize their own experience with (and limited knowledge of) the drug, in an effort to dissuade others from trying something which may help them. this is going to be a problem for us, because the people who have been helped by interventions will gradually stop coming to this forum, but there seems to be a constant supply of would-be Cassandras.
The more I'm reading this thread, the more I feel like what Locoyeti said in the quote above, especially when he talks about the "constant supply of would-be Cassandras"
you can add me to that list as #1, anyway.
I don't know you but with all due respect, I think Mithrandir is right when he says this thread is becoming about "how to discredit a drug" (at least it tends to turn like that) ... I mean, if I remember well you had to quickly stop your trial with Trobalt and didn't take it for so long (even if you started to feel some improvements), so maybe your opinion is a bit biased, don't you think ? ... or you should elaborate a bit more on which basis you are criticizing the use of Trobalt. I saw your last posts about the comparisons between Trobalt and Benzo/GABA-drugs (this one for example :
https://www.tinnitustalk.com/threads/retigabine-trobalt-potiga-—-general-discussion.5074/page-242#post-163682) but reading it, it was still unclear to me why researchers are still targeting kv7 channels and not benzos anymore (not denying that GABA plays a role though), and why there's so many people trying trobalt and coming back saying it deeply affected their tinnitus (see this post for example, for a summary :
https://www.tinnitustalk.com/threads/retigabine-trobalt-potiga-—-general-discussion.5074/page-239#post-162538) while it's definitely not the case for benzo/GABA-drugs ?? (and there's a lot of people taking benzos on this board and a lot of dedicated threads, such that there is enough room for such kind of testimonies, but still I don't see anything like this)
Depends on where you live. I haven't tried trobalt myself, but I see you're in a very early stage to tinnitus, so I would strongly suggest you to not try trobalt because the side effects are not worth it at this point. Many people here may disagree with me, but I believe in our bodys ability to recover. Give it time before you do anything drastically. Again, this is only my opinion.
The same goes for this comment : on which basis can you state that trobalt's side effects are not worth it ??
"would-be Cassandras" ?? Look, I have read all the thread, and all I can say is that all the fear about the side-effects for a short-term use (say 2 or 3 months) have been way, way overestimated ...while in the same time
the possibility of relief have generally remained underevaluated on this thread (again, look at those figures, for what they are worth of course :
https://www.tinnitustalk.com/threads/retigabine-trobalt-potiga-—-general-discussion.5074/page-239#post-162538)
As for my personal experience, you can read here for a summary :
https://www.tinnitustalk.com/threads/retigabine-trobalt-potiga-—-general-discussion.5074/page-219#post-147579
I would add 2 things : first, the only side effect I experienced was to be a bit high for something like one hour after 300 or 400mg; second; if one doubt about my "results", let me just add the following : before starting Trobalt, my tinnitus was "measured" at 11khz and 44dB, 2 weeks ago I've just done the same test and my tinnitus has been measured at 6khz and 28dB ('it's a long-lasting results, in the beginning with Trobalt, my tinnitus was even better than that)
I just let you think about that ...
As
@locoyeti
once said, I think we need more digging, not "would-be Cassandras", but I'm afraid that, after "Danny Boy's case", this thread will be populated by people who will just share their fear or fantasies about this drug, rather than their true experience ...